Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
Rainfall Prediction Using Machine Le...
~
Obaidalla, Ibrahim Abdulla,
Linked to FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Rainfall Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods /
Record Type:
Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
Rainfall Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods // Ibrahim Abdulla Obaidalla.
Author:
Obaidalla, Ibrahim Abdulla,
Description:
1 electronic resource (76 pages)
Notes:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07.
Contained By:
Masters Abstracts International86-07.
Subject:
Computer science. -
Online resource:
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31769609
ISBN:
9798302172426
Rainfall Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods /
Obaidalla, Ibrahim Abdulla,
Rainfall Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods /
Ibrahim Abdulla Obaidalla. - 1 electronic resource (76 pages)
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07.
The capability to predict rainfall effectively is crucial for both economic planning and safety measures. This project examined the performance of three well-known forecasting models: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), and Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving-Average (SARIMA) to determine their accuracy in predicting rainfall patterns. Extensive analysis of data was conducted to identify which model was the most reliable and accurate, considering varying climatic conditions and time scales. The LSTM model, a type of network designed for sequential data, was expected to excel due to its ability to understand long-term dependencies in data series. This is vital for decoding meteorological data influenced by complex physical and time-based dynamics. The architecture of LSTM enabled it to leverage vast amounts of historical rainfall data, allowing it to grasp the subtleties and complexities of weather patterns more effectively than its competitors. Conversely, the ARIMA model, which predicts future points based on past values and error corrections, fails to naturally incorporate seasonality-an essential factor in rainfall forecasting. This gap could result in poorer performance, especially in regions experiencing clear seasonal weather variations. Although robust for various forecasting tasks, ARIMA was predicted to fall short in the rainfall context because of its limitations in modeling seasonal trends.Meanwhile, SARIMA, which builds on the ARIMA model by adding seasonality, was more suited for this task. It was anticipated to achieve moderate success by adjusting for seasonal fluctuations in rainfall data. SARIMA's capacity to handle both seasonal and non-seasonal elements might render it more effective than ARIMA, yet it might still lag behind LSTM, which can manage complex non-linear relationships due to its advanced deep learning capabilities.This investigation employed an exhaustive dataset of daily rainfall records over several decades to train and evaluate each model. The effectiveness of the models was measured using various metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), which shed light on their precision and dependability. Initial results showed that LSTM surpassed both ARIMA and SARIMA in performance, demonstrating superior accuracy and affirming its strength as a robust deep learning tool for capturing intricate patterns. ARIMA's performance was notably weaker, highlighting its difficulties with data featuring inherent seasonal tendencies. Although SARIMA made improvements over ARIMA's flaws by integrating seasonality, it still did not reach the accuracy levels of LSTM.In conclusion, the findings from this project supported the use of LSTM models for weather forecasting, especially in predicting rainfall. The outcomes emphasized the necessity of selecting suitable modeling techniques based on the specific characteristics of the data and the requirements of the forecasting task. Looking ahead, future research might investigate hybrid models that merge the strengths of LSTM with traditional models like SARIMA, potentially creating even more powerful forecasting tools. This work contributes to the ongoing efforts in the meteorological field to enhance prediction accuracy through sophisticated computational methods, helping to better prepare for and respond to weather-related events.
English
ISBN: 9798302172426Subjects--Topical Terms:
523869
Computer science.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Deep learning
Rainfall Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods /
LDR
:04885nmm a22004453i 4500
001
2438758
005
20260727134418.5
006
m o d
007
cr|nu||||||||
008
261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020
$a
9798302172426
035
$a
(MiAaPQD)AAI31769609
035
$a
AAI31769609
040
$a
MiAaPQD
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQD
$e
rda
100
1
$a
Obaidalla, Ibrahim Abdulla,
$e
author.
$3
3830151
245
1 0
$a
Rainfall Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods /
$c
Ibrahim Abdulla Obaidalla.
264
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2024
300
$a
1 electronic resource (76 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07.
500
$a
Advisors: Modak, Sanjay; Karamitsos, Ioannis.
502
$b
M.S.
$c
Rochester Institute of Technology
$d
2024.
520
$a
The capability to predict rainfall effectively is crucial for both economic planning and safety measures. This project examined the performance of three well-known forecasting models: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), and Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving-Average (SARIMA) to determine their accuracy in predicting rainfall patterns. Extensive analysis of data was conducted to identify which model was the most reliable and accurate, considering varying climatic conditions and time scales. The LSTM model, a type of network designed for sequential data, was expected to excel due to its ability to understand long-term dependencies in data series. This is vital for decoding meteorological data influenced by complex physical and time-based dynamics. The architecture of LSTM enabled it to leverage vast amounts of historical rainfall data, allowing it to grasp the subtleties and complexities of weather patterns more effectively than its competitors. Conversely, the ARIMA model, which predicts future points based on past values and error corrections, fails to naturally incorporate seasonality-an essential factor in rainfall forecasting. This gap could result in poorer performance, especially in regions experiencing clear seasonal weather variations. Although robust for various forecasting tasks, ARIMA was predicted to fall short in the rainfall context because of its limitations in modeling seasonal trends.Meanwhile, SARIMA, which builds on the ARIMA model by adding seasonality, was more suited for this task. It was anticipated to achieve moderate success by adjusting for seasonal fluctuations in rainfall data. SARIMA's capacity to handle both seasonal and non-seasonal elements might render it more effective than ARIMA, yet it might still lag behind LSTM, which can manage complex non-linear relationships due to its advanced deep learning capabilities.This investigation employed an exhaustive dataset of daily rainfall records over several decades to train and evaluate each model. The effectiveness of the models was measured using various metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), which shed light on their precision and dependability. Initial results showed that LSTM surpassed both ARIMA and SARIMA in performance, demonstrating superior accuracy and affirming its strength as a robust deep learning tool for capturing intricate patterns. ARIMA's performance was notably weaker, highlighting its difficulties with data featuring inherent seasonal tendencies. Although SARIMA made improvements over ARIMA's flaws by integrating seasonality, it still did not reach the accuracy levels of LSTM.In conclusion, the findings from this project supported the use of LSTM models for weather forecasting, especially in predicting rainfall. The outcomes emphasized the necessity of selecting suitable modeling techniques based on the specific characteristics of the data and the requirements of the forecasting task. Looking ahead, future research might investigate hybrid models that merge the strengths of LSTM with traditional models like SARIMA, potentially creating even more powerful forecasting tools. This work contributes to the ongoing efforts in the meteorological field to enhance prediction accuracy through sophisticated computational methods, helping to better prepare for and respond to weather-related events.
546
$a
English
590
$a
School code: 0465
650
4
$a
Computer science.
$3
523869
650
4
$a
Climate change.
$2
bicssc
$3
2079509
650
4
$a
Meteorology.
$3
542822
653
$a
Deep learning
653
$a
Long Short-Term Memory
653
$a
Rainfall prediction
653
$a
Mean Absolute Error
690
$a
0984
690
$a
0800
690
$a
0404
690
$a
0557
710
2
$a
Rochester Institute of Technology.
$b
Data Science.
$e
degree granting institution.
$3
3817159
720
1
$a
Modak, Sanjay
$e
degree supervisor.
720
1
$a
Karamitsos, Ioannis
$e
degree supervisor.
773
0
$t
Masters Abstracts International
$g
86-07.
790
$a
0465
791
$a
M.S.
792
$a
2024
856
4 0
$u
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31769609
based on 0 review(s)
Location:
ALL
電子資源
Year:
Volume Number:
Items
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Inventory Number
Location Name
Item Class
Material type
Call number
Usage Class
Loan Status
No. of reservations
Opac note
Attachments
W9534453
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
On shelf
0
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login