東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Evaluation of Classical Piston Theor...

Wu, Eugene I,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Evaluation of Classical Piston Theory as an Aerodynamic Design Analysis Method /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Evaluation of Classical Piston Theory as an Aerodynamic Design Analysis Method // Eugene I Wu.
作者:	Wu, Eugene I,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (51 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-06.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International86-06.
標題:	Aerospace engineering. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31637665
ISBN:	9798346807032

Evaluation of Classical Piston Theory as an Aerodynamic Design Analysis Method /
Wu, Eugene I,

Evaluation of Classical Piston Theory as an Aerodynamic Design Analysis Method /Eugene I Wu. - 1 electronic resource (51 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-06.

With plans for commercial hypersonic flight becoming more prevalent, designers have greater needs for a tool that allows quick analysis of various potential designs and filters out unviable designs. Among these available tools, piston theory is a prominent tool for aircraft stability and flutter analysis. Classical piston theory's viability as a design tool was assessed by comparing its output on a flat plate delta wing with VORLAX, a vortex lattice solver, and ANSYS FLUENT. The outputs that all 3 methods were required to calculate were the coefficients of lift and moment, and their derivatives due to pitch rate. The analysis concluded that when applying the 2-dimensional flow assumption to classical piston theory, it had good steady-state accuracy whenever the angle of attack was less than five degrees. However, due to numerical method disagreement, unsteady flight prediction remained uncertain. For future work, confirmation of various assumptions is needed, and an expansion to include more geometries, flight conditions, and flight parameters would be beneficial.

English

ISBN: 9798346807032Subjects--Topical Terms:

1002622
Aerospace engineering.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Piston theory

Evaluation of Classical Piston Theory as an Aerodynamic Design Analysis Method /
LDR:02427nmm a22004093i 4500 001 2438717
005 20260727134413.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798346807032
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31637665
035 $a AAI31637665
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Wu, Eugene I, $e author. $3 3830096
245 1 0 $a Evaluation of Classical Piston Theory as an Aerodynamic Design Analysis Method / $c Eugene I Wu.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (51 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-06.
500 $a Advisors: Kim, Jeonglae Committee members: Mignolet, Marc; Takahashi, Timothy.
502 $b M.S. $c Arizona State University $d 2024.
520 $a With plans for commercial hypersonic flight becoming more prevalent, designers have greater needs for a tool that allows quick analysis of various potential designs and filters out unviable designs. Among these available tools, piston theory is a prominent tool for aircraft stability and flutter analysis. Classical piston theory's viability as a design tool was assessed by comparing its output on a flat plate delta wing with VORLAX, a vortex lattice solver, and ANSYS FLUENT. The outputs that all 3 methods were required to calculate were the coefficients of lift and moment, and their derivatives due to pitch rate. The analysis concluded that when applying the 2-dimensional flow assumption to classical piston theory, it had good steady-state accuracy whenever the angle of attack was less than five degrees. However, due to numerical method disagreement, unsteady flight prediction remained uncertain. For future work, confirmation of various assumptions is needed, and an expansion to include more geometries, flight conditions, and flight parameters would be beneficial.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0010
650 4 $a Aerospace engineering. $3 1002622
650 4 $a Fluid mechanics. $3 528155
653 $a Piston theory
653 $a Aerodynamic design
653 $a Aircraft stability
653 $a Flutter analysis
690 $a 0538
690 $a 0204
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Aerospace Engineering. $e degree granting institution. $3 3830097
720 1 $a Kim, Jeonglae $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 86-06.
790 $a 0010
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31637665