東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Applying UAS LiDAR for Developing Sm...

Siddiqui, Ashraf,

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Applying UAS LiDAR for Developing Small Project Terrain Models /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Applying UAS LiDAR for Developing Small Project Terrain Models // Ashraf Siddiqui.
Author:	Siddiqui, Ashraf,
Description:	1 electronic resource (105 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International86-03.
Subject:	Geographic information science. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31487367
ISBN:	9798384063247

Applying UAS LiDAR for Developing Small Project Terrain Models /
Siddiqui, Ashraf,

Applying UAS LiDAR for Developing Small Project Terrain Models /Ashraf Siddiqui. - 1 electronic resource (105 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03.

Unmanned aerial systems (UAS) LiDAR was used to collect survey data for small-area projects, particularly bridge replacement projects. The project aimed to compare UAS LiDAR data with conventional surveying methods. For the project, five bridge sites were selected for UAS LiDAR and conventional survey data collection, which include Lincoln Bridge 1 (East), Lincoln Bridge 2 (West), Humnoke, Frenchman's Bayou, and Mountain Home. Data for each site was collected during the 2021-2022 winter. A DJI M600 Pro and Phoenix LiDAR Systems AL3-16 LiDAR unit were used for the UAS LiDAR measurements. The conventional survey equipment used included a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) real time kinematics (RTK) system and a robotic total station. LiDAR missions were planned using a combination of Google Earth®, Phoenix LiDAR Systems' Flightplanner, and Litchi Mission Hub. Flights were conducted at an altitude of 45 meters above ground level (AGL), with 50 percent side lap, ensuring comprehensive coverage. Weather and environmental conditions were carefully considered for optimal data collection. The LiDAR data were processed using Phoenix LiDAR System's LiDARMill online software service. The processing involved GNSS data correction, trajectory optimization, and LiDAR data alignment and classification. Additionally, LAS tools were employed to enhance ground classification, reduce noise, and generate accurate digital elevation models. The accuracy of UAS LiDAR was assessed by comparing the UARK and ARDOT LiDAR datasets and ground survey data collected using GNSS and total station checkpoints for hard and soft surfaces. Errors between the UAS LiDAR and checkpoints were compared using aerial photos, bar graphs, and box and whisker plots, and direct raster comparisons were made whenever multiple LiDAR datasets were available. Overall, errors of up to approximately 1.0 inch can be expected for hard surfaces, with potential for both over- and under-predictions. An overprediction error of 1.0 inch to 3.5 inches can be expected for grass surfaces, depending on grass height. Larger overprediction errors of 2.0 inches to 5.0 inches can be expected for tall grass areas, while errors ranging between 2.0 inches and 7.0 inches can be expected for tree areas. The cost savings analysis showed that UAS LiDAR demonstrated an average cost reduction of $1,195.41 per project compared to helicopter LiDAR, resulting in a 20 percent reduction in the cost of collecting data for small-area bridge projects. In addition, UAS LiDAR exhibited an average cost reduction of $10,539.18 per bridge project compared to conventional survey methods, resulting in a 25 percent reduction in the cost of surveys for small-area bridge projects. Overall, UAS LiDAR proves to be a valuable tool for obtaining elevation data, with good accuracy for hard surfaces and expected variations for soft surfaces. Despite the limitations, the cost savings analysis puts UAS LiDAR surveying a clear advantage over both helicopter LiDAR and conventional surveying methods for small-area bridge projects.

English

ISBN: 9798384063247Subjects--Topical Terms:

3432445
Geographic information science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Drone

Applying UAS LiDAR for Developing Small Project Terrain Models /
LDR:04458nmm a22004333i 4500 001 2438460
005 20260727132412.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798384063247
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31487367
035 $a AAI31487367
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Siddiqui, Ashraf, $e author. $3 3829782
245 1 0 $a Applying UAS LiDAR for Developing Small Project Terrain Models / $c Ashraf Siddiqui.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (105 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03.
500 $a Advisors: Wood, Clinton Committee members: Hernandez, Sarah; Barry, Michelle.
502 $b M.S.C.E. $c University of Arkansas $d 2024.
520 $a Unmanned aerial systems (UAS) LiDAR was used to collect survey data for small-area projects, particularly bridge replacement projects. The project aimed to compare UAS LiDAR data with conventional surveying methods. For the project, five bridge sites were selected for UAS LiDAR and conventional survey data collection, which include Lincoln Bridge 1 (East), Lincoln Bridge 2 (West), Humnoke, Frenchman's Bayou, and Mountain Home. Data for each site was collected during the 2021-2022 winter. A DJI M600 Pro and Phoenix LiDAR Systems AL3-16 LiDAR unit were used for the UAS LiDAR measurements. The conventional survey equipment used included a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) real time kinematics (RTK) system and a robotic total station. LiDAR missions were planned using a combination of Google Earth®, Phoenix LiDAR Systems' Flightplanner, and Litchi Mission Hub. Flights were conducted at an altitude of 45 meters above ground level (AGL), with 50 percent side lap, ensuring comprehensive coverage. Weather and environmental conditions were carefully considered for optimal data collection. The LiDAR data were processed using Phoenix LiDAR System's LiDARMill online software service. The processing involved GNSS data correction, trajectory optimization, and LiDAR data alignment and classification. Additionally, LAS tools were employed to enhance ground classification, reduce noise, and generate accurate digital elevation models. The accuracy of UAS LiDAR was assessed by comparing the UARK and ARDOT LiDAR datasets and ground survey data collected using GNSS and total station checkpoints for hard and soft surfaces. Errors between the UAS LiDAR and checkpoints were compared using aerial photos, bar graphs, and box and whisker plots, and direct raster comparisons were made whenever multiple LiDAR datasets were available. Overall, errors of up to approximately 1.0 inch can be expected for hard surfaces, with potential for both over- and under-predictions. An overprediction error of 1.0 inch to 3.5 inches can be expected for grass surfaces, depending on grass height. Larger overprediction errors of 2.0 inches to 5.0 inches can be expected for tall grass areas, while errors ranging between 2.0 inches and 7.0 inches can be expected for tree areas. The cost savings analysis showed that UAS LiDAR demonstrated an average cost reduction of $1,195.41 per project compared to helicopter LiDAR, resulting in a 20 percent reduction in the cost of collecting data for small-area bridge projects. In addition, UAS LiDAR exhibited an average cost reduction of $10,539.18 per bridge project compared to conventional survey methods, resulting in a 25 percent reduction in the cost of surveys for small-area bridge projects. Overall, UAS LiDAR proves to be a valuable tool for obtaining elevation data, with good accuracy for hard surfaces and expected variations for soft surfaces. Despite the limitations, the cost savings analysis puts UAS LiDAR surveying a clear advantage over both helicopter LiDAR and conventional surveying methods for small-area bridge projects.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0011
650 4 $a Geographic information science. $3 3432445
650 4 $a Transportation. $3 555912
653 $a Drone
653 $a Geospatial data
653 $a LiDAR
653 $a Survey
653 $a Unmanned aerial systems
690 $a 0543
690 $a 0370
690 $a 0709
710 2 $a University of Arkansas. $b Civil Engineering. $e degree granting institution. $3 3824438
720 1 $a Wood, Clinton $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 86-03.
790 $a 0011
791 $a M.S.C.E.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31487367