東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

How Does Writing Instruction Impact ...

Chiu, Chiachyi,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

How Does Writing Instruction Impact Chinese as a Foreign Language Learners' Literacy /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	How Does Writing Instruction Impact Chinese as a Foreign Language Learners' Literacy // Chiachyi Chiu.
作者:	Chiu, Chiachyi,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (265 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-04, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-04A.
標題:	Reading instruction. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31482730
ISBN:	9798384480662

How Does Writing Instruction Impact Chinese as a Foreign Language Learners' Literacy /
Chiu, Chiachyi,

How Does Writing Instruction Impact Chinese as a Foreign Language Learners' Literacy /Chiachyi Chiu. - 1 electronic resource (265 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-04, Section: A.

This Educational Leadership Portfolio (ELP) sought to address the challenge of optimizing handwriting instructional practices and assessment methods for teaching Chinese as a foreign language (CFL) at St. Andrew's School (SAS). SAS is an Episcopal, co-educational boarding school in Middletown, Delaware. With 18 years of experience as the primary Chinese teacher at SAS, my goal was to improve literacy development by identifying the most efficient method for teaching Chinese characters to beginner and intermediate-level CFL students.The aim of this ELP was to assess whether traditional handwriting instruction or typing instruction is more effective in facilitating learning for CFL learners. Three key research questions guided this ELP: 1) Does traditional handwriting instruction and/or typing instruction lead to learning for CFL learners' vocabulary, character knowledge, or sentence composition?2) Does the order of traditional handwriting instruction and typing instruction lead to changes in CFL learners' vocabulary, character knowledge, or sentence composition? 3) Does prior language exposure or motivation influence changes in CFL learners' vocabulary, character knowledge, or sentence composition? By addressing these questions, this study sought to provide valuable insights into instructional methods that optimize CFL learning outcomes.Through a structured study involving Chinese 2, 3, 4, and 5 classes over a 5-week duration, 23 participants were divided into groups to receive handwriting-then-typing or typing-then-handwriting instruction to evaluate the efficacy of stroke order and radical instruction versus stroke order animation video clips for character acquisition. Evidence indicated that both handwriting and typing instruction supported learning across measures of vocabulary, character knowledge, and sentence composition. However, the Handwriting-Typing Group outperformed the Typing-Handwriting Group in vocabulary, character knowledge, and sentence composition. Further, participants exhibited more unprompted self-referential comments during handwriting tasks, indicating a perceived social value or utility of handwriting over typing. Additionally, students demonstrated slightly higher levels of intrinsic motivation toward handwriting instruction, suggesting a preference for handwriting in social contexts. These findings highlight the nuanced relationship between instructional methods and learner perceptions in CFL education.

English

ISBN: 9798384480662Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122756
Reading instruction.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Chinese as a foreign language

How Does Writing Instruction Impact Chinese as a Foreign Language Learners' Literacy /
LDR:03973nmm a22004453i 4500 001 2438453
005 20260727132411.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798384480662
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31482730
035 $a AAI31482730
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Chiu, Chiachyi, $e author. $3 3829770
245 1 0 $a How Does Writing Instruction Impact Chinese as a Foreign Language Learners' Literacy / $c Chiachyi Chiu.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (265 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-04, Section: A.
500 $a Advisors: Del Tufo, Stephanie Committee members: Amendum, Steve; Budde, Christina; Dong, Renee.
502 $b D.Ed. $c University of Delaware $d 2024.
520 $a This Educational Leadership Portfolio (ELP) sought to address the challenge of optimizing handwriting instructional practices and assessment methods for teaching Chinese as a foreign language (CFL) at St. Andrew's School (SAS). SAS is an Episcopal, co-educational boarding school in Middletown, Delaware. With 18 years of experience as the primary Chinese teacher at SAS, my goal was to improve literacy development by identifying the most efficient method for teaching Chinese characters to beginner and intermediate-level CFL students.The aim of this ELP was to assess whether traditional handwriting instruction or typing instruction is more effective in facilitating learning for CFL learners. Three key research questions guided this ELP: 1) Does traditional handwriting instruction and/or typing instruction lead to learning for CFL learners' vocabulary, character knowledge, or sentence composition?2) Does the order of traditional handwriting instruction and typing instruction lead to changes in CFL learners' vocabulary, character knowledge, or sentence composition? 3) Does prior language exposure or motivation influence changes in CFL learners' vocabulary, character knowledge, or sentence composition? By addressing these questions, this study sought to provide valuable insights into instructional methods that optimize CFL learning outcomes.Through a structured study involving Chinese 2, 3, 4, and 5 classes over a 5-week duration, 23 participants were divided into groups to receive handwriting-then-typing or typing-then-handwriting instruction to evaluate the efficacy of stroke order and radical instruction versus stroke order animation video clips for character acquisition. Evidence indicated that both handwriting and typing instruction supported learning across measures of vocabulary, character knowledge, and sentence composition. However, the Handwriting-Typing Group outperformed the Typing-Handwriting Group in vocabulary, character knowledge, and sentence composition. Further, participants exhibited more unprompted self-referential comments during handwriting tasks, indicating a perceived social value or utility of handwriting over typing. Additionally, students demonstrated slightly higher levels of intrinsic motivation toward handwriting instruction, suggesting a preference for handwriting in social contexts. These findings highlight the nuanced relationship between instructional methods and learner perceptions in CFL education.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0060
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
650 4 $a Foreign language instruction. $3 3541319
650 4 $a Educational leadership. $3 529436
653 $a Chinese as a foreign language
653 $a Handwriting instruction
653 $a Literacy development
653 $a Motivation
653 $a Reading
653 $a Typing instruction
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0444
690 $a 0535
710 2 $a University of Delaware. $b Education and Social Policy. $e degree granting institution. $3 3829771
720 1 $a Del Tufo, Stephanie $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-04A.
790 $a 0060
791 $a D.Ed.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31482730