東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Comparison of Outcomes in Adolescent...

Oki, Dayton Shinta,

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Comparison of Outcomes in Adolescents Treated With Aligners Versus Fixed Appliances in an Academic Setting /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Comparison of Outcomes in Adolescents Treated With Aligners Versus Fixed Appliances in an Academic Setting // Dayton Shinta Oki.
Author:	Oki, Dayton Shinta,
Description:	1 electronic resource (34 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-10.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International86-10.
Subject:	Dentistry. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31846955
ISBN:	9798310397101

Comparison of Outcomes in Adolescents Treated With Aligners Versus Fixed Appliances in an Academic Setting /
Oki, Dayton Shinta,

Comparison of Outcomes in Adolescents Treated With Aligners Versus Fixed Appliances in an Academic Setting /Dayton Shinta Oki. - 1 electronic resource (34 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-10.

Background: Adolescents are increasingly requesting and being treated with aligners, and there is a need for better information regarding treatment indications and outcomes in this population. Purpose: The aims of this study were to compare treatment efficacy and efficiency, presence and extent of new or larger white spot lesions (WSL), and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL) in adolescent patients treated with aligners versus fixed appliances (FA) in an academic dental clinic. Study Design: This cohort study was carried out in the University of Washington (UW) Graduate Orthodontics clinic. 29 adolescent subjects (18 male and 11 female, mean age = 14) treated with aligners and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were recruited and matched 1:1 with adolescent subjects treated with FA. Pre-treatment characteristics were collected, and subjects were contacted to complete a modified OHIP-14 questionnaire to evaluate their OHRQOL. Treatment efficacy was assessed by comparing the peer assessment rating (PAR) scores and treatment efficiency was assessed by comparing the number of emergency visits, de-bonded appliances, appointment visits, and treatment time. Presence and extent of new or larger WSLs were assessed evaluating the incisors from the digital photos using the ImageJ software. Results: The two groups had similar demographic and pre-treatment parameters, as well as post-treatment PAR scores. There was a trend for less de-bonded appliances in the aligner group (mean A = 1.0 vs. FA = 3.0 appliances; p = 0.07), but no significant difference in the treatment time. However, participants in the aligner group had significantly less treatment visits (mean A = 15.7 vs. FA = 21.3 visits; p < 0.001) and emergency visits (mean A = 0.4 vs. FA = 1.0 visits; p = 0.01). Participants in the aligner group had significantly fewer maxillary incisors with new or larger WSLs (p = 0.02), and oral hygiene counselling was provided three times less frequently (p = 0.01) compared to participants in the FA group. Lastly, the groups had similar total OHIP-14 scores, but only 26% of participants in the aligner group reported occasional interruption of meals versus 70% of participants in the FA group (p = 0.02). Conclusions: This study found both groups had similar PAR outcomes and treatment times. However, participants in the aligner group had fewer emergency visits, treatment visits, de-bonded appliances, new or larger WSLs, and interruption of meals compared to participants in the FA group.

English

ISBN: 9798310397101Subjects--Topical Terms:

828971
Dentistry.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Adolescents

Comparison of Outcomes in Adolescents Treated With Aligners Versus Fixed Appliances in an Academic Setting /
LDR:03948nmm a22004333i 4500 001 2438284
005 20251210114000.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2025 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798310397101
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31846955
035 $a AAI31846955
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Oki, Dayton Shinta, $e author. $3 3829536
245 1 0 $a Comparison of Outcomes in Adolescents Treated With Aligners Versus Fixed Appliances in an Academic Setting / $c Dayton Shinta Oki.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2025
300 $a 1 electronic resource (34 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-10.
500 $a Advisors: Huang, Greg Committee members: Randall, Cameron; Bayirli, Burcu; Mancl, Lloyd .
502 $b M.S.D.R. $c University of Washington $d 2025.
520 $a Background: Adolescents are increasingly requesting and being treated with aligners, and there is a need for better information regarding treatment indications and outcomes in this population. Purpose: The aims of this study were to compare treatment efficacy and efficiency, presence and extent of new or larger white spot lesions (WSL), and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL) in adolescent patients treated with aligners versus fixed appliances (FA) in an academic dental clinic. Study Design: This cohort study was carried out in the University of Washington (UW) Graduate Orthodontics clinic. 29 adolescent subjects (18 male and 11 female, mean age = 14) treated with aligners and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were recruited and matched 1:1 with adolescent subjects treated with FA. Pre-treatment characteristics were collected, and subjects were contacted to complete a modified OHIP-14 questionnaire to evaluate their OHRQOL. Treatment efficacy was assessed by comparing the peer assessment rating (PAR) scores and treatment efficiency was assessed by comparing the number of emergency visits, de-bonded appliances, appointment visits, and treatment time. Presence and extent of new or larger WSLs were assessed evaluating the incisors from the digital photos using the ImageJ software. Results: The two groups had similar demographic and pre-treatment parameters, as well as post-treatment PAR scores. There was a trend for less de-bonded appliances in the aligner group (mean A = 1.0 vs. FA = 3.0 appliances; p = 0.07), but no significant difference in the treatment time. However, participants in the aligner group had significantly less treatment visits (mean A = 15.7 vs. FA = 21.3 visits; p < 0.001) and emergency visits (mean A = 0.4 vs. FA = 1.0 visits; p = 0.01). Participants in the aligner group had significantly fewer maxillary incisors with new or larger WSLs (p = 0.02), and oral hygiene counselling was provided three times less frequently (p = 0.01) compared to participants in the FA group. Lastly, the groups had similar total OHIP-14 scores, but only 26% of participants in the aligner group reported occasional interruption of meals versus 70% of participants in the FA group (p = 0.02). Conclusions: This study found both groups had similar PAR outcomes and treatment times. However, participants in the aligner group had fewer emergency visits, treatment visits, de-bonded appliances, new or larger WSLs, and interruption of meals compared to participants in the FA group.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0250
650 4 $a Dentistry. $3 828971
650 4 $a Medicine. $3 641104
650 4 $a Health sciences. $3 3168359
653 $a Adolescents
653 $a Aligners
653 $a Fixed appliances
653 $a Outcomes
653 $a White spot lesions
690 $a 0567
690 $a 0566
690 $a 0564
710 2 $a University of Washington. $b Orthodontics. $e degree granting institution. $3 3829537
720 1 $a Huang, Greg $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 86-10.
790 $a 0250
791 $a M.S.D.R.
792 $a 2025
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31846955