東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

A Critical Examination of Obstacles ...

Hauptfeld, Kathrin Rina Simone,

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Critical Examination of Obstacles and Opportunities to Building Capacity for Community Engaged Social-Ecological Research and Management /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	A Critical Examination of Obstacles and Opportunities to Building Capacity for Community Engaged Social-Ecological Research and Management // Kathrin Rina Simone Hauptfeld.
Author:	Hauptfeld, Kathrin Rina Simone,
Description:	1 electronic resource (174 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-06, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-06B.
Subject:	Natural resource management. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31144381
ISBN:	9798346871248

A Critical Examination of Obstacles and Opportunities to Building Capacity for Community Engaged Social-Ecological Research and Management /
Hauptfeld, Kathrin Rina Simone,

A Critical Examination of Obstacles and Opportunities to Building Capacity for Community Engaged Social-Ecological Research and Management /Kathrin Rina Simone Hauptfeld. - 1 electronic resource (174 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-06, Section: B.

This dissertation seeks to contribute to more equitable and effective local governance and research of social-ecological systems. Specifically, I investigated efforts to enhance the distribution of influence and capacity, particularly to historically marginalized actors. This required critical evaluation of factors that influence whether and how interventions to build influence and capacity do so. Chapter one introduces the theoretical framing to this research, my positionality, and an overview of chapter organization. In my first two manuscripts (Chapters 2 and 3), I research underexamined elements of public participation in scientific research (i.e., delegated local ecological monitoring) as a proposed tool for building community capacity for resource management, particularly in developing economies. I seek to understand local ecological monitoring from multiple levels of influence - both the perspectives of resource-dependent participants, as well as from the perspectives of the program implementers. Specifically, Chapter 2 seeks to understand the experience of participants (i.e., small-scale fisherfolk with a role in the management of marine protected areas in the Philippines) to investigate the narrative that local ecological monitoring empowers communities to manage their social-ecological systems. I find that monitoring programs largely failed to be adopted by local communities, and rather than empowering participants, were perceived as burdens and a reaffirmation of local hierarchies. My findings highlight the risks of uncritically applying 'participatory' approaches, and stress the need to recognize and design for the psycho-political contexts (e.g., agency) to achieve desired outcomes. In considering context, this study makes a novel contribution to the characterization of citizen science approaches, by distinguishing externally initiated programs in which monitoring is intended to become autonomous. In consideration of the failed outcomes in Chapter 2, Chapter 3 investigates the potential for win-win outcomes in citizen science by examining an understudied area - organizer rationales for engaging local participants in contributory programs in the Philippines. I find that organizer rationales for and perceptions of engaging participants were multiple, overlapping, and sometimes antagonistic, particularly regarding who is served, and who determines the objectives, suggesting that outcomes often framed as benefits in the literature may sometimes not benefit participants. To foster clarity and encourage reflexivity in citizen science programs, I map these findings onto the normative - substantive - instrumental typology of rationales to propose an adapted typology rooted in the realities of citizen science. Chapter 4 addresses the flip side of the participation equation by investigating how high- 'cost' community-oriented collaborative conservation practices are built and sustained among U.S. academics and practitioners. This retrospective program evaluation found that immersion into a community of practice, and obligations and opportunities to experiment with collaborative approaches fostered capacity - notably conviction for, awareness of, and comfort with collaborative conservation - resulting in long-term adoption of practice. The findings in these studies shed light on important obstacles and opportunities for enhancing efficacy and equity in community-engaged research and management endeavors increasingly sought in social-ecological systems. Notably, a pervasive thread to emerge from these chapters is the important role of intentional design using a systems-thinking approach, regarding linked social-ecological systems, multiple levels of influence, and temporal scales.

English

ISBN: 9798346871248Subjects--Topical Terms:

589570
Natural resource management.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Capacity building

A Critical Examination of Obstacles and Opportunities to Building Capacity for Community Engaged Social-Ecological Research and Management /
LDR:05388nmm a22004693i 4500 001 2437340
005 20251119142757.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798346871248
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31144381
035 $a AAI31144381
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Hauptfeld, Kathrin Rina Simone, $e author. $3 3828282
245 1 2 $a A Critical Examination of Obstacles and Opportunities to Building Capacity for Community Engaged Social-Ecological Research and Management / $c Kathrin Rina Simone Hauptfeld.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (174 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-06, Section: B.
500 $a Advisors: Newman, Gregory Committee members: Bruyere, Brett; Pejchar, Liba; Zarestky, Jill.
502 $b Ph.D. $c Colorado State University $d 2024.
520 $a This dissertation seeks to contribute to more equitable and effective local governance and research of social-ecological systems. Specifically, I investigated efforts to enhance the distribution of influence and capacity, particularly to historically marginalized actors. This required critical evaluation of factors that influence whether and how interventions to build influence and capacity do so. Chapter one introduces the theoretical framing to this research, my positionality, and an overview of chapter organization. In my first two manuscripts (Chapters 2 and 3), I research underexamined elements of public participation in scientific research (i.e., delegated local ecological monitoring) as a proposed tool for building community capacity for resource management, particularly in developing economies. I seek to understand local ecological monitoring from multiple levels of influence - both the perspectives of resource-dependent participants, as well as from the perspectives of the program implementers. Specifically, Chapter 2 seeks to understand the experience of participants (i.e., small-scale fisherfolk with a role in the management of marine protected areas in the Philippines) to investigate the narrative that local ecological monitoring empowers communities to manage their social-ecological systems. I find that monitoring programs largely failed to be adopted by local communities, and rather than empowering participants, were perceived as burdens and a reaffirmation of local hierarchies. My findings highlight the risks of uncritically applying 'participatory' approaches, and stress the need to recognize and design for the psycho-political contexts (e.g., agency) to achieve desired outcomes. In considering context, this study makes a novel contribution to the characterization of citizen science approaches, by distinguishing externally initiated programs in which monitoring is intended to become autonomous. In consideration of the failed outcomes in Chapter 2, Chapter 3 investigates the potential for win-win outcomes in citizen science by examining an understudied area - organizer rationales for engaging local participants in contributory programs in the Philippines. I find that organizer rationales for and perceptions of engaging participants were multiple, overlapping, and sometimes antagonistic, particularly regarding who is served, and who determines the objectives, suggesting that outcomes often framed as benefits in the literature may sometimes not benefit participants. To foster clarity and encourage reflexivity in citizen science programs, I map these findings onto the normative - substantive - instrumental typology of rationales to propose an adapted typology rooted in the realities of citizen science. Chapter 4 addresses the flip side of the participation equation by investigating how high- 'cost' community-oriented collaborative conservation practices are built and sustained among U.S. academics and practitioners. This retrospective program evaluation found that immersion into a community of practice, and obligations and opportunities to experiment with collaborative approaches fostered capacity - notably conviction for, awareness of, and comfort with collaborative conservation - resulting in long-term adoption of practice. The findings in these studies shed light on important obstacles and opportunities for enhancing efficacy and equity in community-engaged research and management endeavors increasingly sought in social-ecological systems. Notably, a pervasive thread to emerge from these chapters is the important role of intentional design using a systems-thinking approach, regarding linked social-ecological systems, multiple levels of influence, and temporal scales.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0053
650 4 $a Natural resource management. $3 589570
650 4 $a Sustainability. $3 1029978
650 4 $a Social research. $3 2122687
650 4 $a Ecology. $3 516476
650 4 $a Marine geology. $3 3173821
653 $a Capacity building
653 $a Co-management
653 $a Collaborative conservation
653 $a Delegated local ecological monitoring
653 $a Marine protected areas
653 $a Public participation
690 $a 0528
690 $a 0640
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0556
690 $a 0329
710 2 $a Colorado State University. $b Ecology (Graduate Degree Program). $e degree granting institution. $3 3815965
720 1 $a Newman, Gregory $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-06B.
790 $a 0053
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31144381