東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Tailoring Reports for Patient-Report...

Cole, Amy C.,

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Tailoring Reports for Patient-Reported Health Information Within Digital Health Tools: Impacts on the Quality of Values Elicitation and Clarification for Complex Treatment Decision-Making in Older Adults with Advanced Cancers /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Tailoring Reports for Patient-Reported Health Information Within Digital Health Tools: Impacts on the Quality of Values Elicitation and Clarification for Complex Treatment Decision-Making in Older Adults with Advanced Cancers // Amy C Cole.
Author:	Cole, Amy C.,
Description:	1 electronic resource (254 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-11, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-11B.
Subject:	Oncology. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31768562
ISBN:	9798315714804

Tailoring Reports for Patient-Reported Health Information Within Digital Health Tools: Impacts on the Quality of Values Elicitation and Clarification for Complex Treatment Decision-Making in Older Adults with Advanced Cancers /
Cole, Amy C.,

Tailoring Reports for Patient-Reported Health Information Within Digital Health Tools: Impacts on the Quality of Values Elicitation and Clarification for Complex Treatment Decision-Making in Older Adults with Advanced Cancers /Amy C Cole. - 1 electronic resource (254 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-11, Section: B.

For older adults (≥60) with advanced cancer, treatment decisions may vary substantially from those diagnosed at an earlier stage. Often these patients feel their values and concerns are not incorporated in treatment decisions. Effective methods are needed to elicit, discuss and incorporate patient values into treatment decisions. Best-worst scaling (BWS) is a theory driven approach used in healthcare to elicit values. Tailoring health information, including question prompt lists, can encourage patients to actively participate in consultations. This dissertation addresses a research gap in understanding how tailoring summary reports based on patients' values elicited from a BWS instrument can prepare and encourage patients to discuss their values and engage in shared decision-making (SDM). This dissertation was conducted in four stages; engagement, development, pretesting, and pilot testing of a values-clarification tool called VOICE. During engagement and development, key stakeholders engaged in concept mapping activities, resulting in consensus on 7 treatment values and 2-3 question prompts per value that are important to older adults with advanced cancer. This aim emphasized participatory engagement among diverse stakeholders and incorporation of tailoring techniques to ensure VOICE was relevant to the intended patient population. During pretesting, participants perceived VOICE to be effective, acceptable, and useful for preparing older adults with advanced cancer to engage in values-based discussions with their clinicians. Patients' desire to assess, reassess and discuss their values must be incorporated into consultations, and patients want to work with their clinician to align their care with what matters most to them as an individual. During pilot testing, VOICE was found to be more useful in preparing patients to discuss their values than an American Cancer Society flyer, and patients had a clear preference for values-based discussions. This dissertation provided evidence that VOICE resulted in higher quality values-based discussions while highlighting the need for values-clarification training for medical students and oncologists. This dissertation advances knowledge regarding values-clarification, yet further research is still needed to better understand the influencers and contextual factors that provide facilitation or barriers to improving engagement between patients and clinicians and ensures patients values are discussed, understood, and incorporated into treatment decisions.

English

ISBN: 9798315714804Subjects--Topical Terms:

751006
Oncology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Decision support tools

Tailoring Reports for Patient-Reported Health Information Within Digital Health Tools: Impacts on the Quality of Values Elicitation and Clarification for Complex Treatment Decision-Making in Older Adults with Advanced Cancers /
LDR:04270nmm a22004573i 4500 001 2437142
005 20251118105034.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2025 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798315714804
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31768562
035 $a AAI31768562
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Cole, Amy C., $e author. $3 3828034
245 1 0 $a Tailoring Reports for Patient-Reported Health Information Within Digital Health Tools: Impacts on the Quality of Values Elicitation and Clarification for Complex Treatment Decision-Making in Older Adults with Advanced Cancers / $c Amy C Cole.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2025
300 $a 1 electronic resource (254 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-11, Section: B.
500 $a Advisors: Mazur, Lukasz Committee members: Stover, Angela M.; Yu, Fei; Vizer, Lisa; King, Andy J.; Richardson, Daniel R.
502 $b Ph.D. $c The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill $d 2025.
520 $a For older adults (≥60) with advanced cancer, treatment decisions may vary substantially from those diagnosed at an earlier stage. Often these patients feel their values and concerns are not incorporated in treatment decisions. Effective methods are needed to elicit, discuss and incorporate patient values into treatment decisions. Best-worst scaling (BWS) is a theory driven approach used in healthcare to elicit values. Tailoring health information, including question prompt lists, can encourage patients to actively participate in consultations. This dissertation addresses a research gap in understanding how tailoring summary reports based on patients' values elicited from a BWS instrument can prepare and encourage patients to discuss their values and engage in shared decision-making (SDM). This dissertation was conducted in four stages; engagement, development, pretesting, and pilot testing of a values-clarification tool called VOICE. During engagement and development, key stakeholders engaged in concept mapping activities, resulting in consensus on 7 treatment values and 2-3 question prompts per value that are important to older adults with advanced cancer. This aim emphasized participatory engagement among diverse stakeholders and incorporation of tailoring techniques to ensure VOICE was relevant to the intended patient population. During pretesting, participants perceived VOICE to be effective, acceptable, and useful for preparing older adults with advanced cancer to engage in values-based discussions with their clinicians. Patients' desire to assess, reassess and discuss their values must be incorporated into consultations, and patients want to work with their clinician to align their care with what matters most to them as an individual. During pilot testing, VOICE was found to be more useful in preparing patients to discuss their values than an American Cancer Society flyer, and patients had a clear preference for values-based discussions. This dissertation provided evidence that VOICE resulted in higher quality values-based discussions while highlighting the need for values-clarification training for medical students and oncologists. This dissertation advances knowledge regarding values-clarification, yet further research is still needed to better understand the influencers and contextual factors that provide facilitation or barriers to improving engagement between patients and clinicians and ensures patients values are discussed, understood, and incorporated into treatment decisions.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0153
650 4 $a Oncology. $3 751006
650 4 $a Gerontology. $3 533633
650 4 $a Biostatistics. $3 1002712
650 4 $a Aging. $3 543123
653 $a Decision support tools
653 $a Human factors
653 $a Patient-clinician communication
653 $a Shared decision-making
653 $a Tailoring health information
653 $a Values-clarification
690 $a 0992
690 $a 0351
690 $a 0308
690 $a 0493
710 2 $a The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. $b Health Informatics. $e degree granting institution. $3 3828035
720 1 $a Mazur, Lukasz $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-11B.
790 $a 0153
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2025
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31768562