東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Supporting the Professional Developm...

Tuffnell, Christopher,

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Supporting the Professional Development of Educators for Blended Learning Design Using Tpack: A Design-Based Research Study /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Supporting the Professional Development of Educators for Blended Learning Design Using Tpack: A Design-Based Research Study // Christopher Tuffnell.
Author:	Tuffnell, Christopher,
Description:	1 electronic resource (402 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-07B.
Subject:	Pedagogy. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31824996
ISBN:	9798302375001

Supporting the Professional Development of Educators for Blended Learning Design Using Tpack: A Design-Based Research Study /
Tuffnell, Christopher,

Supporting the Professional Development of Educators for Blended Learning Design Using Tpack: A Design-Based Research Study /Christopher Tuffnell. - 1 electronic resource (402 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: B.

A growing body of literature on blended learning in higher education suggests that the phenomenon is strategically important on the grounds of flexibility, increased learner engagement, and critical skill development, along with a positive impact on the achievement of learning outcomes. However, the success of blended learning presents a burden on educators to be adept at distinct learning design skills. The current literature does not adequately cover professional development, which addresses how educators should design blended learning or articulate specific pedagogical design approaches for blended learning.Therefore, this study used a Design-Based Research approach to explore how educators can support the development of their own blended learning designs. Multiple iterations of a professional development course to guide educators' blended learning design approaches have been implemented at a university research site in Dubai. The university endeavoured to become the first accredited institute in the UAE to redesign its programmes for blended learning delivery. The research cycles included an analysis of the literature to inform the development of design conjectures, which in turn underpinned the design of the professional development course. Subsequently, data, including participants' design artefacts and post-course interviews, were analysed for each cycle through the lens of TPACK to evaluate participants' experience in the course, substantiate design conjectures, and inform iterative improvement of the design intervention course.Cycle-A's findings showed that the inclusion of reflective practices deepened comprehension and encouraged thoughtful design approaches, while the inclusion of a flipped learning model was deemed to support participants' blended learning design decisions. Findings from cycle-B identified that the inclusion of active blended learning strategies and intentional collaborative opportunities significantly enhanced the learning experience. In addition, a learner-centred approach was deemed beneficial in further guiding participants' blended learning design decisions. Finally, cycle-C's findings identified that a cohort-based flipped learning course design could effectively engage participants. In addition, the participants' technological confidence and competence increased through coaching and support.This study makes several contributions to the literature, including highlighting the centrality of learning design in supporting educators' transition to designers of blended learning. A new iterative blended learning design (IBLD) model is proposed that synthesises the findings and integrates the design conjectures developed across the three DBR cycles, which can serve as the basis for future research in the field of professional development for blended learning design.

English

ISBN: 9798302375001Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122828
Pedagogy.

Supporting the Professional Development of Educators for Blended Learning Design Using Tpack: A Design-Based Research Study /
LDR:04264nmm a22004573i 4500 001 2436914
005 20251117053652.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798302375001
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31824996
035 $a AAI31824996
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Tuffnell, Christopher, $e author. $3 3827744
245 1 0 $a Supporting the Professional Development of Educators for Blended Learning Design Using Tpack: A Design-Based Research Study / $c Christopher Tuffnell.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (402 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: B.
500 $a Advisors: Bligh, Brett.
502 $b Ph.D. $c Lancaster University (United Kingdom) $d 2024.
520 $a A growing body of literature on blended learning in higher education suggests that the phenomenon is strategically important on the grounds of flexibility, increased learner engagement, and critical skill development, along with a positive impact on the achievement of learning outcomes. However, the success of blended learning presents a burden on educators to be adept at distinct learning design skills. The current literature does not adequately cover professional development, which addresses how educators should design blended learning or articulate specific pedagogical design approaches for blended learning.Therefore, this study used a Design-Based Research approach to explore how educators can support the development of their own blended learning designs. Multiple iterations of a professional development course to guide educators' blended learning design approaches have been implemented at a university research site in Dubai. The university endeavoured to become the first accredited institute in the UAE to redesign its programmes for blended learning delivery. The research cycles included an analysis of the literature to inform the development of design conjectures, which in turn underpinned the design of the professional development course. Subsequently, data, including participants' design artefacts and post-course interviews, were analysed for each cycle through the lens of TPACK to evaluate participants' experience in the course, substantiate design conjectures, and inform iterative improvement of the design intervention course.Cycle-A's findings showed that the inclusion of reflective practices deepened comprehension and encouraged thoughtful design approaches, while the inclusion of a flipped learning model was deemed to support participants' blended learning design decisions. Findings from cycle-B identified that the inclusion of active blended learning strategies and intentional collaborative opportunities significantly enhanced the learning experience. In addition, a learner-centred approach was deemed beneficial in further guiding participants' blended learning design decisions. Finally, cycle-C's findings identified that a cohort-based flipped learning course design could effectively engage participants. In addition, the participants' technological confidence and competence increased through coaching and support.This study makes several contributions to the literature, including highlighting the centrality of learning design in supporting educators' transition to designers of blended learning. A new iterative blended learning design (IBLD) model is proposed that synthesises the findings and integrates the design conjectures developed across the three DBR cycles, which can serve as the basis for future research in the field of professional development for blended learning design.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0416
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 2122828
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Peer review. $3 624199
650 4 $a Instructional design. $3 3172279
650 4 $a School environment. $3 541935
650 4 $a Adaptation. $3 3562958
650 4 $a Blended learning. $3 615697
650 4 $a Distance learning. $3 3557921
650 4 $a Teachers. $3 529573
650 4 $a Technology. $3 531676
650 4 $a Skills. $3 3221615
650 4 $a Flipped classroom. $3 3686635
650 4 $a Educational objectives. $3 3566291
650 4 $a Pandemics. $3 3464080
650 4 $a Flexibility. $3 3560705
650 4 $a Online instruction. $3 3562296
650 4 $a Empathy. $3 532108
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 2191387
650 4 $a Collaborative learning. $3 3543645
650 4 $a Continuing education. $3 527504
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
650 4 $a Design. $3 518875
650 4 $a Educational administration. $3 2122799
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Epidemiology. $3 568544
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0447
690 $a 0456
690 $a 0458
690 $a 0651
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0514
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0766
710 2 $a Lancaster University (United Kingdom). $e degree granting institution. $3 3815477
720 1 $a Bligh, Brett $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-07B.
790 $a 0416
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31824996