東華大學圖書館 |

Change the Story, Change the Curriculum: The Curriculum-as-Story Metaphor as a Flexible Lens for Interpreting Curricular (In)Coherence From Students' Perspectives and Beyond /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Change the Story, Change the Curriculum: The Curriculum-as-Story Metaphor as a Flexible Lens for Interpreting Curricular (In)Coherence From Students' Perspectives and Beyond // Brady Anthony Tyburski.
作者:	Tyburski, Brady Anthony,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (314 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-06, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-06A.
標題:	Mathematics education. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31640274
ISBN:	9798346810650

Change the Story, Change the Curriculum: The Curriculum-as-Story Metaphor as a Flexible Lens for Interpreting Curricular (In)Coherence From Students' Perspectives and Beyond /
Tyburski, Brady Anthony,

Change the Story, Change the Curriculum: The Curriculum-as-Story Metaphor as a Flexible Lens for Interpreting Curricular (In)Coherence From Students' Perspectives and Beyond /Brady Anthony Tyburski. - 1 electronic resource (314 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-06, Section: A.

A common educational assumption is that coherence is a pre-requisite for a "good" curriculum. Indeed, in mathematics education this perspective has persisted both nationally and internationally as a foundational principle for curriculum design, reform, and evaluation. While curricular coherence is often unquestioningly accepted as desirable for student learning, some researchers have urged caution, arguing that "curricular coherence" is loosely defined with no widespread agreement over its meaning. Yet, disciplinary, logico-rational forms of coherence (i.e., retrospective expert perspectives) tend to dominate curricular discourses in mathematics education, often in ways that position these disciplinary forms of coherence as objective evaluations of curricula. Other perspectives on what it means for curricula to be "coherent"-particularly those of students-are rarely centered, which has epistemological as well as ethical consequences for who/what is positioned as coherent (i.e., "ideal") and who/what is positioned as incoherent (i.e., abnormal, aberrant, incomplete). This binary imposes a distribution of "sensible" mathematics learning, thereby perpetuating a harmful culture of exclusion in mathematics education.In this dissertation, I critically investigate curricular coherence in mathematics education by interrogating the notion of coherence itself and problematizing the dominance of a singular perspective on coherence. To do so, I conceptualize curriculum as a storied artform and view coherence as an individual's holistic aesthetic judgement of curricular stories. These judgements are highly subjective and may vary from person to person as well as discipline to discipline, destabilizing the myth that curricular coherence is an objective evaluation with a singular definition. Rather, I contend that curricular coherence must be defined kaleidoscopically via a plurality of disciplinary and stakeholder perspectives. To this end, I investigate three interrelated questions: (1) Ontologically, what is coherence in its many forms? In other words, what does "coherence" refer to in both mathematics and science education, as well as in other disciplines? Additionally, according to these ontologies, who is positioned with the authority to make judgements or evaluations of (in)coherence? (2) What are the aesthetic, ethical, and onto-epistemological foundations behind the common (and often implicit) assumption that coherence (in its many forms) is desirable? What are the consequences of these philosophical assumptions for curriculum? For learning? For how learners as positioned? In other words, I question curricular coherence for what purpose? (3) Finally, what are the flexible possibilities (and tensions) for conceptualizing curriculum using an aesthetic curriculum-as-story metaphor to investigate various forms of curricular (in)coherence from multiple stakeholder perspectives?I inquire about these overarching questions through three interrelated studies-one theoretical and the other two empirical-situated within an arts-based research paradigm. These investigations serve as a type of disciplinary-cultural analysis and artistic critique from both my own and students' perspectives with the overriding goal of interrogating and shifting the normative value of (curricular) coherence in mathematics education. More broadly, this dissertation spotlights the aesthetic dimension of learning mathematics as well as the danger of divisive and dehumanizing politics of aesthetics inherent to uncritical conceptualizations of so-called "desirable" modes of teaching and learning, such as the privileged logico-rational definition of curricular coherence that is the current status quo.

English

ISBN: 9798346810650Subjects--Topical Terms:

641129
Mathematics education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Arts-based research

Change the Story, Change the Curriculum: The Curriculum-as-Story Metaphor as a Flexible Lens for Interpreting Curricular (In)Coherence From Students' Perspectives and Beyond /
LDR:05418nmm a22004573i 4500 001 2436897
005 20251117053648.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798346810650
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31640274
035 $a AAI31640274
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Tyburski, Brady Anthony, $e author. $0 (orcid)0000-0002-8758-367X $3 3827718
245 1 0 $a Change the Story, Change the Curriculum: The Curriculum-as-Story Metaphor as a Flexible Lens for Interpreting Curricular (In)Coherence From Students' Perspectives and Beyond / $c Brady Anthony Tyburski.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (314 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-06, Section: A.
500 $a Advisors: Herbel-Eisenmann, Beth A.; Bieda, Kristen N. Committee members: Dietiker, Leslie; Dominguez, Higinio; Green, Jennifer.
502 $b Ph.D. $c Michigan State University $d 2024.
520 $a A common educational assumption is that coherence is a pre-requisite for a "good" curriculum. Indeed, in mathematics education this perspective has persisted both nationally and internationally as a foundational principle for curriculum design, reform, and evaluation. While curricular coherence is often unquestioningly accepted as desirable for student learning, some researchers have urged caution, arguing that "curricular coherence" is loosely defined with no widespread agreement over its meaning. Yet, disciplinary, logico-rational forms of coherence (i.e., retrospective expert perspectives) tend to dominate curricular discourses in mathematics education, often in ways that position these disciplinary forms of coherence as objective evaluations of curricula. Other perspectives on what it means for curricula to be "coherent"-particularly those of students-are rarely centered, which has epistemological as well as ethical consequences for who/what is positioned as coherent (i.e., "ideal") and who/what is positioned as incoherent (i.e., abnormal, aberrant, incomplete). This binary imposes a distribution of "sensible" mathematics learning, thereby perpetuating a harmful culture of exclusion in mathematics education.In this dissertation, I critically investigate curricular coherence in mathematics education by interrogating the notion of coherence itself and problematizing the dominance of a singular perspective on coherence. To do so, I conceptualize curriculum as a storied artform and view coherence as an individual's holistic aesthetic judgement of curricular stories. These judgements are highly subjective and may vary from person to person as well as discipline to discipline, destabilizing the myth that curricular coherence is an objective evaluation with a singular definition. Rather, I contend that curricular coherence must be defined kaleidoscopically via a plurality of disciplinary and stakeholder perspectives. To this end, I investigate three interrelated questions: (1) Ontologically, what is coherence in its many forms? In other words, what does "coherence" refer to in both mathematics and science education, as well as in other disciplines? Additionally, according to these ontologies, who is positioned with the authority to make judgements or evaluations of (in)coherence? (2) What are the aesthetic, ethical, and onto-epistemological foundations behind the common (and often implicit) assumption that coherence (in its many forms) is desirable? What are the consequences of these philosophical assumptions for curriculum? For learning? For how learners as positioned? In other words, I question curricular coherence for what purpose? (3) Finally, what are the flexible possibilities (and tensions) for conceptualizing curriculum using an aesthetic curriculum-as-story metaphor to investigate various forms of curricular (in)coherence from multiple stakeholder perspectives?I inquire about these overarching questions through three interrelated studies-one theoretical and the other two empirical-situated within an arts-based research paradigm. These investigations serve as a type of disciplinary-cultural analysis and artistic critique from both my own and students' perspectives with the overriding goal of interrogating and shifting the normative value of (curricular) coherence in mathematics education. More broadly, this dissertation spotlights the aesthetic dimension of learning mathematics as well as the danger of divisive and dehumanizing politics of aesthetics inherent to uncritical conceptualizations of so-called "desirable" modes of teaching and learning, such as the privileged logico-rational definition of curricular coherence that is the current status quo.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0128
650 4 $a Mathematics education. $3 641129
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
650 4 $a Aesthetics. $3 523036
650 4 $a Instructional design. $3 3172279
653 $a Arts-based research
653 $a Curricular coherence
653 $a Curriculum as a story
653 $a Politics of aesthetics
653 $a Student perspectives
690 $a 0280
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0650
690 $a 0447
710 2 $a Michigan State University. $b Mathematics Education - Doctor of Philosophy. $e degree granting institution. $3 3827719
720 1 $a Herbel-Eisenmann, Beth A. $e degree supervisor.
720 1 $a Bieda, Kristen N. $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-06A.
790 $a 0128
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31640274