東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Automated Grading Using Generative AI /

Downes, Thomas,

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Automated Grading Using Generative AI /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Automated Grading Using Generative AI // Thomas Downes.
Author:	Downes, Thomas,
Description:	1 electronic resource (45 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International86-03.
Subject:	Software. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31357978
ISBN:	9798384336969

Automated Grading Using Generative AI /
Downes, Thomas,

Automated Grading Using Generative AI /Thomas Downes. - 1 electronic resource (45 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03.

Recent innovations in AI have enabled a wide array of new applications to improve human lives and productivity. These innovations enable the automation of mundane, and repetitive tasks to an extent never before seen. In this work we leverage this technology to create a system which can automate the time-consuming task of grading student homework submis- sions, while also maintaining a level of quality that students expect. To aid instruction, the system also provides a summary of common mistakes made by students and for students it provides individualized written feedback intended to improve learning outcomes, all while reducing the grading workload for instructors.In addition to developing the system, we used real student data to evaluate the efficacy and acceptance of the system. This began with using the system to grade student sub- missions from archived semesters, and comparing the grades assigned by the TA and our system. Next we had students in current courses engage with the system with their current assignments. Students were provided with written feedback shortly after submitting their homework assignment, and asked to rate how useful they found the feedback. This feedback was chosen randomly from either the TA or the automatic grading system. Our results show that the system is capable of automatically grading student submissions with a quality comparable to a human grader, and provides feedback that students found helpful.

English

ISBN: 9798384336969Subjects--Topical Terms:

619355
Software.

Automated Grading Using Generative AI /
LDR:02841nmm a22004453i 4500 001 2436366
005 20251023092712.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798384336969
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31357978
035 $a (MiAaPQD)Pittsburgh46229
035 $a AAI31357978
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Downes, Thomas, $e author. $3 3826987
245 1 0 $a Automated Grading Using Generative AI / $c Thomas Downes.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (45 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03.
500 $a Advisors: Lee, Adam J.; Babichenko, Dmitriy; Biehl, Jacob.
502 $b M.S. $c University of Pittsburgh $d 2024.
520 $a Recent innovations in AI have enabled a wide array of new applications to improve human lives and productivity. These innovations enable the automation of mundane, and repetitive tasks to an extent never before seen. In this work we leverage this technology to create a system which can automate the time-consuming task of grading student homework submis- sions, while also maintaining a level of quality that students expect. To aid instruction, the system also provides a summary of common mistakes made by students and for students it provides individualized written feedback intended to improve learning outcomes, all while reducing the grading workload for instructors.In addition to developing the system, we used real student data to evaluate the efficacy and acceptance of the system. This began with using the system to grade student sub- missions from archived semesters, and comparing the grades assigned by the TA and our system. Next we had students in current courses engage with the system with their current assignments. Students were provided with written feedback shortly after submitting their homework assignment, and asked to rate how useful they found the feedback. This feedback was chosen randomly from either the TA or the automatic grading system. Our results show that the system is capable of automatically grading student submissions with a quality comparable to a human grader, and provides feedback that students found helpful.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0178
650 4 $a Software. $2 gtt. $3 619355
650 4 $a Technological change. $3 3564100
650 4 $a Systems design. $3 3433840
650 4 $a Library and information science. $3 3564727
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Likert scale. $3 3451196
650 4 $a Teachers. $3 529573
650 4 $a Chatbots. $3 3705435
650 4 $a Natural language. $3 3562052
650 4 $a Classrooms. $3 1598668
650 4 $a Neural networks. $3 677449
650 4 $a Homework. $3 564290
650 4 $a Design. $3 518875
650 4 $a Information science. $3 554358
650 4 $a Information technology. $3 532993
650 4 $a Library science. $3 539284
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0800
690 $a 0723
690 $a 0489
690 $a 0399
710 2 $a University of Pittsburgh. $e degree granting institution. $3 3759199
720 1 $a Lee, Adam J. $e degree supervisor.
720 1 $a Babichenko, Dmitriy $e degree supervisor.
720 1 $a Biehl, Jacob $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 86-03.
790 $a 0178
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31357978