東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The Effects of Auditory Biofeedback ...

Kuchta, Ariana,

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Effects of Auditory Biofeedback on Movement Variability and Risk Factors of ACL Injury /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The Effects of Auditory Biofeedback on Movement Variability and Risk Factors of ACL Injury // Ariana Kuchta.
Author:	Kuchta, Ariana,
Description:	1 electronic resource (64 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-11.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International86-11.
Subject:	Kinesiology. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31993558
ISBN:	9798314846315

The Effects of Auditory Biofeedback on Movement Variability and Risk Factors of ACL Injury /
Kuchta, Ariana,

The Effects of Auditory Biofeedback on Movement Variability and Risk Factors of ACL Injury /Ariana Kuchta. - 1 electronic resource (64 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-11.

Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are some of the most common injuries within athletics and has several injury risk reduction programs. Previous studies have shown that audible feedback (AudFB) is successful in conveying external attentional focus, while discouraging improper biomechanics in intervention training, and increasing movement variability. Following the variability-overuse injury hypothesis, increasing variability as a means of reducing ACL injury risk should be considered. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of AudFB to increase variability in jump-landing biomechanics following a 4-week intervention and that participants would demonstrate greater variability in the jump-landing biomechanics after training compared to baseline. Methods: Sixteen healthy adults between the ages 18 and 35 with no prior knee injury were recruited. Over an 8-week period, participants were required to attend a baseline, 1-week post, and 4-week post intervention data collection session, as well as three 30-minute intervention sessions a week for the 4-week intervention period. AudFB was conveyed to all participants simultaneously with exercise through a series of sensors placed in their shoes. Each buzzer was adjusted so that the buzzer will not go off if body weight is evenly distributed but will elicit a sound if weight is not evenly distributed across the foot for unilateral tasks or between limbs in the case of bilateral tasks. The participant was instructed to move so that the buzzers do not make a sound. Because of the jump landing task's relationship to non-contact ACL injury, it was chosen for the study. Results: The findings from this study supported the hypothesis, that the use of an AudFB device increased variability in landing biomechanics at 1- and 4-weeks following the intervention. Significant alterations in hip and knee flexion angles and moments were seen. Hip and knee flexion angles were increased, and moments decreased. Variation within movement metrics were increased. Vertical ground reaction force was lower bilaterally at follow-up. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that AudFB can effectively alter landing biomechanics while increasing movement variability. As observed in this study, AudFB is effective in creating more adaptable movement patterns and reduce vGRF, which may be essential in preventing ACL injuries. AudFB is a relatively accessible resource and can be readily incorporated into clinical practices including, but not limited to, performance, strength and conditioning, athletic training, and physical therapy.

English

ISBN: 9798314846315Subjects--Topical Terms:

517627
Kinesiology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Anterior cruciate ligament

The Effects of Auditory Biofeedback on Movement Variability and Risk Factors of ACL Injury /
LDR:04066nmm a22004213i 4500 001 2436077
005 20251021115107.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2025 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798314846315
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31993558
035 $a AAI31993558
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Kuchta, Ariana, $e author. $3 3826609
245 1 0 $a The Effects of Auditory Biofeedback on Movement Variability and Risk Factors of ACL Injury / $c Ariana Kuchta.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2025
300 $a 1 electronic resource (64 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-11.
500 $a Advisors: Thomas Fenwick, Abbey Committee members: Linens, Shelley; Donovan, Luke.
502 $b M.S. $c The University of North Carolina at Charlotte $d 2025.
520 $a Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are some of the most common injuries within athletics and has several injury risk reduction programs. Previous studies have shown that audible feedback (AudFB) is successful in conveying external attentional focus, while discouraging improper biomechanics in intervention training, and increasing movement variability. Following the variability-overuse injury hypothesis, increasing variability as a means of reducing ACL injury risk should be considered. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of AudFB to increase variability in jump-landing biomechanics following a 4-week intervention and that participants would demonstrate greater variability in the jump-landing biomechanics after training compared to baseline. Methods: Sixteen healthy adults between the ages 18 and 35 with no prior knee injury were recruited. Over an 8-week period, participants were required to attend a baseline, 1-week post, and 4-week post intervention data collection session, as well as three 30-minute intervention sessions a week for the 4-week intervention period. AudFB was conveyed to all participants simultaneously with exercise through a series of sensors placed in their shoes. Each buzzer was adjusted so that the buzzer will not go off if body weight is evenly distributed but will elicit a sound if weight is not evenly distributed across the foot for unilateral tasks or between limbs in the case of bilateral tasks. The participant was instructed to move so that the buzzers do not make a sound. Because of the jump landing task's relationship to non-contact ACL injury, it was chosen for the study. Results: The findings from this study supported the hypothesis, that the use of an AudFB device increased variability in landing biomechanics at 1- and 4-weeks following the intervention. Significant alterations in hip and knee flexion angles and moments were seen. Hip and knee flexion angles were increased, and moments decreased. Variation within movement metrics were increased. Vertical ground reaction force was lower bilaterally at follow-up. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that AudFB can effectively alter landing biomechanics while increasing movement variability. As observed in this study, AudFB is effective in creating more adaptable movement patterns and reduce vGRF, which may be essential in preventing ACL injuries. AudFB is a relatively accessible resource and can be readily incorporated into clinical practices including, but not limited to, performance, strength and conditioning, athletic training, and physical therapy.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0694
650 4 $a Kinesiology. $3 517627
650 4 $a Biomedical engineering. $3 535387
650 4 $a Biomechanics. $3 548685
653 $a Anterior cruciate ligament
653 $a Auditory biofeedback
653 $a Movement variability
653 $a Movement patterns
690 $a 0575
690 $a 0541
690 $a 0648
710 2 $a The University of North Carolina at Charlotte. $b Health Services Research. $e degree granting institution. $3 3816557
720 1 $a Thomas Fenwick, Abbey $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 86-11.
790 $a 0694
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2025
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31993558