東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Faculty Perspectives on Generative A...

Kell, Carrie,

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Faculty Perspectives on Generative AI in First-Year Writing: A Grounded Theory Study /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Faculty Perspectives on Generative AI in First-Year Writing: A Grounded Theory Study // Carrie Kell.
Author:	Kell, Carrie,
Description:	1 electronic resource (94 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-11, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-11B.
Subject:	Rhetoric. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=32040154
ISBN:	9798315747727

Faculty Perspectives on Generative AI in First-Year Writing: A Grounded Theory Study /
Kell, Carrie,

Faculty Perspectives on Generative AI in First-Year Writing: A Grounded Theory Study /Carrie Kell. - 1 electronic resource (94 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-11, Section: B.

This dissertation explores faculty perceptions and pedagogical approaches of generative AI (GenAI) within the first-year writing classroom. Through a qualitative grounded theory approach, this study investigates how faculty engage with, understand, and adopt GenAI in their teaching of first-year writing. Drawing on interviews with faculty across diverse institutions of higher education, findings indicate that they are largely in the early stages of GenAI adoption. Cautious attitudes, ethical uncertainty, and inconsistent levels of AI literacy underpin the faculty's perception of GenAI. These findings reveal that while faculty recognize there is a place for GenAI in the writing classroom, a pedagogical framework has not emerged due to the need for professional development, AI literacy, and curated guidance. In response, this study introduces the Practitioner-Informed AI Pedagogy (PIAP) Model, a conceptual framework that supports faculty-led integration of GenAI. The PIAP Model outlines three iterative phases: exploration, reflection, and application. This model offers a practitioner-based approach for instructors to develop their AI literacy while cultivating informed pedagogical approaches to integrating GenAI into writing instruction.

English

ISBN: 9798315747727Subjects--Topical Terms:

516647
Rhetoric.
Subjects--Index Terms:

First year writing

Faculty Perspectives on Generative AI in First-Year Writing: A Grounded Theory Study /
LDR:02637nmm a22004213i 4500 001 2435856
005 20251029060407.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2025 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798315747727
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI32040154
035 $a AAI32040154
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Kell, Carrie, $e author. $3 3826319
245 1 0 $a Faculty Perspectives on Generative AI in First-Year Writing: A Grounded Theory Study / $c Carrie Kell.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2025
300 $a 1 electronic resource (94 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-11, Section: B.
500 $a Advisors: Cain, William Committee members: McKim, Courtney; Scull, Reed.
502 $b Ed.D. $c University of Wyoming $d 2025.
520 $a This dissertation explores faculty perceptions and pedagogical approaches of generative AI (GenAI) within the first-year writing classroom. Through a qualitative grounded theory approach, this study investigates how faculty engage with, understand, and adopt GenAI in their teaching of first-year writing. Drawing on interviews with faculty across diverse institutions of higher education, findings indicate that they are largely in the early stages of GenAI adoption. Cautious attitudes, ethical uncertainty, and inconsistent levels of AI literacy underpin the faculty's perception of GenAI. These findings reveal that while faculty recognize there is a place for GenAI in the writing classroom, a pedagogical framework has not emerged due to the need for professional development, AI literacy, and curated guidance. In response, this study introduces the Practitioner-Informed AI Pedagogy (PIAP) Model, a conceptual framework that supports faculty-led integration of GenAI. The PIAP Model outlines three iterative phases: exploration, reflection, and application. This model offers a practitioner-based approach for instructors to develop their AI literacy while cultivating informed pedagogical approaches to integrating GenAI into writing instruction.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0264
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 2122828
653 $a First year writing
653 $a Technology
653 $a Writing classroom
653 $a Reflection
690 $a 0800
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0456
710 2 $a University of Wyoming. $b Adult Learning & Technology. $e degree granting institution. $3 3826320
720 1 $a Cain, William $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-11B.
790 $a 0264
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2025
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=32040154