東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Mitigation of Thermal Stress in Swin...

Cecil, Mekenzie R.,

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Mitigation of Thermal Stress in Swine Through Precision Environmental Management and Nutrition /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Mitigation of Thermal Stress in Swine Through Precision Environmental Management and Nutrition // Mekenzie R Cecil.
Author:	Cecil, Mekenzie R.,
Description:	1 electronic resource (132 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-12.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International86-12.
Subject:	Physiology. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=32013774
ISBN:	9798286407002

Mitigation of Thermal Stress in Swine Through Precision Environmental Management and Nutrition /
Cecil, Mekenzie R.,

Mitigation of Thermal Stress in Swine Through Precision Environmental Management and Nutrition /Mekenzie R Cecil. - 1 electronic resource (132 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-12.

Thermal stress in the swine industry is an issue that has been discussed for decades, but with the worldwide trend of increasing global temperatures, the incidences and duration of heat stress in our livestock species will be greater than previously reported in past literature. To accommodate piglet thermal requirements, producers use heating lamps or pads combined with maintaining farrowing room macroenvironment dry bulb temperatures (MTDB) at levels approaching heat stress for lactating sows. However, this may decrease sow feed consumption, milk production, and litter growth. Therefore, the first research study objective was to determine the MTDB that would improve sow and litter productivity and welfare measures. Lactating sows (N = 37; Landrace x Yorkshire; parity = 3.1 ± 1.7) and their litters (12.0 ± 1.0 piglets/litter) were housed in 1 of 3 farrowing room MTDB: LOW (n = 12 sows and litters; 15.0 ± 0.4℃), MID (n = 13 sows and litters; 19.3 ± 0.2℃), and HIGH (n = 12 sows and litters; 24.6 ± 0.8℃). Data for both studies were analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX with either sow, litter, or piglet as the experimental unit. Sow FI was greater (P< 0.01; +1.25 kg) for LOW and MID versus HIGH sows, but similar between LOW and MID sows. Piglet ADG was greater overall (P< 0.01; +45 g) for LOW and MID versus HIGH piglets, but similar for LOW and MID piglets. Sow RR was greater (P< 0.01; +18 bpm) for HIGH vs MID and LOW sows but were similar for MID and LOW sows. The second research study objective was to evaluate whether a phytogenic supplement would reduce the physiological stress response in heat-stressed (HS)gestating sows, thereby improving growth and welfare outcomes in their piglets following weaning and transport. Thirty-six pregnant sows (Large White x Landrace; parity = 2.0 ± 1.2) were subjected to either thermoneutral (TN; 20.72 ± 0.97℃) or cyclical HS (26-36℃) conditions from gestation d 6-59. Sows received either ad libitumwater (C) or water with a phytogenic supplement (Phytozen® (P), Probiotech International, Inc.; 0.2 mL/L). Sow RR was reduced (P< 0.01; 16.1%) in HSP versus HSC sows, but both HSC and HSP sows had greater (94.3%) RR when compared to TNC and TNP sows. Sow Tear, Tshoulder, Trump, and Ttailwere reduced (P< 0.01; -0.53, -0.42, -0.56, and -0.30℃, respectively) in HSP when compared to HSC sows, but both HSC and HSP sows had greater skin temperatures when compared to TNC and TNP sows. A decrease in sow Tvwas observed (P< 0.01; -0.49℃) in TNP vs TNC, HSC, and HSP sows. Weaned piglets per litter was greater (P< 0.01; 27.0%) in HSP versus HSC, TNC, and TNP litters. Plasma cortisol levels were reduced (P= 0.03; 6.65%) in HSP pigs versus HSC pigs post-weaning. Nursery ADG was reduced (P< 0.01; 13.8%) for HSP and TNP versus HSC and TNC litters and was greatest (19.9%) in TNC litters. In summary, these data suggest that lower farrowing room MTDBmay maximize both sow and litter productivity and welfare measures, and providing a monoterpene-based phytogenic supplement during early gestation HS had some positive outcomes such as reducing the postnatal physiological stress response in piglets but negatively impacted offspring growth performance. Future directions should focus on mitigating thermal stress in the swine industry, but also on the mechanisms of action that phytogenic supplements have on the developing fetus.

English

ISBN: 9798286407002Subjects--Topical Terms:

518431
Physiology.

Mitigation of Thermal Stress in Swine Through Precision Environmental Management and Nutrition /
LDR:04853nmm a22004573i 4500 001 2435851
005 20251029060406.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2025 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798286407002
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI32013774
035 $a (MiAaPQD)Purdue28795877
035 $a AAI32013774
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Cecil, Mekenzie R., $e author. $3 3826312
245 1 0 $a Mitigation of Thermal Stress in Swine Through Precision Environmental Management and Nutrition / $c Mekenzie R Cecil.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2025
300 $a 1 electronic resource (132 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-12.
500 $a Advisors: Johnson, Jay S.; Richert, Brian T. Committee members: Brito, Luiz F.
502 $b M.S. $c Purdue University $d 2025.
520 $a Thermal stress in the swine industry is an issue that has been discussed for decades, but with the worldwide trend of increasing global temperatures, the incidences and duration of heat stress in our livestock species will be greater than previously reported in past literature. To accommodate piglet thermal requirements, producers use heating lamps or pads combined with maintaining farrowing room macroenvironment dry bulb temperatures (MTDB) at levels approaching heat stress for lactating sows. However, this may decrease sow feed consumption, milk production, and litter growth. Therefore, the first research study objective was to determine the MTDB that would improve sow and litter productivity and welfare measures. Lactating sows (N = 37; Landrace x Yorkshire; parity = 3.1 ± 1.7) and their litters (12.0 ± 1.0 piglets/litter) were housed in 1 of 3 farrowing room MTDB: LOW (n = 12 sows and litters; 15.0 ± 0.4℃), MID (n = 13 sows and litters; 19.3 ± 0.2℃), and HIGH (n = 12 sows and litters; 24.6 ± 0.8℃). Data for both studies were analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX with either sow, litter, or piglet as the experimental unit. Sow FI was greater (P< 0.01; +1.25 kg) for LOW and MID versus HIGH sows, but similar between LOW and MID sows. Piglet ADG was greater overall (P< 0.01; +45 g) for LOW and MID versus HIGH piglets, but similar for LOW and MID piglets. Sow RR was greater (P< 0.01; +18 bpm) for HIGH vs MID and LOW sows but were similar for MID and LOW sows. The second research study objective was to evaluate whether a phytogenic supplement would reduce the physiological stress response in heat-stressed (HS)gestating sows, thereby improving growth and welfare outcomes in their piglets following weaning and transport. Thirty-six pregnant sows (Large White x Landrace; parity = 2.0 ± 1.2) were subjected to either thermoneutral (TN; 20.72 ± 0.97℃) or cyclical HS (26-36℃) conditions from gestation d 6-59. Sows received either ad libitumwater (C) or water with a phytogenic supplement (Phytozen® (P), Probiotech International, Inc.; 0.2 mL/L). Sow RR was reduced (P< 0.01; 16.1%) in HSP versus HSC sows, but both HSC and HSP sows had greater (94.3%) RR when compared to TNC and TNP sows. Sow Tear, Tshoulder, Trump, and Ttailwere reduced (P< 0.01; -0.53, -0.42, -0.56, and -0.30℃, respectively) in HSP when compared to HSC sows, but both HSC and HSP sows had greater skin temperatures when compared to TNC and TNP sows. A decrease in sow Tvwas observed (P< 0.01; -0.49℃) in TNP vs TNC, HSC, and HSP sows. Weaned piglets per litter was greater (P< 0.01; 27.0%) in HSP versus HSC, TNC, and TNP litters. Plasma cortisol levels were reduced (P= 0.03; 6.65%) in HSP pigs versus HSC pigs post-weaning. Nursery ADG was reduced (P< 0.01; 13.8%) for HSP and TNP versus HSC and TNC litters and was greatest (19.9%) in TNC litters. In summary, these data suggest that lower farrowing room MTDBmay maximize both sow and litter productivity and welfare measures, and providing a monoterpene-based phytogenic supplement during early gestation HS had some positive outcomes such as reducing the postnatal physiological stress response in piglets but negatively impacted offspring growth performance. Future directions should focus on mitigating thermal stress in the swine industry, but also on the mechanisms of action that phytogenic supplements have on the developing fetus.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0183
650 4 $a Physiology. $3 518431
650 4 $a Affect (Psychology). $3 606519
650 4 $a Behavior. $3 532476
650 4 $a Animal welfare. $3 523936
650 4 $a Hormones. $3 548778
650 4 $a Livestock. $3 539534
650 4 $a Feeds. $3 659935
650 4 $a Zoology. $3 518878
650 4 $a Stress response. $3 3684641
650 4 $a Influenza. $3 924085
650 4 $a Hogs. $3 3554056
650 4 $a Energy. $3 876794
650 4 $a Metabolism. $3 541349
650 4 $a Respiration. $3 610890
650 4 $a Oils & fats. $3 3561739
650 4 $a Fetuses. $3 3696590
650 4 $a Immune system. $3 689864
650 4 $a Body temperature. $3 916233
650 4 $a Body fat. $3 3435313
650 4 $a Age groups. $2 bicssc $3 2081388
650 4 $a Animal sciences. $3 3174829
650 4 $a Weaning. $3 3685019
650 4 $a Endocrinology. $3 610914
650 4 $a Immunology. $3 611031
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
690 $a 0472
690 $a 0791
690 $a 0475
690 $a 0719
690 $a 0409
690 $a 0474
690 $a 0982
690 $a 0621
710 2 $a Purdue University. $e degree granting institution. $3 3759105
720 1 $a Johnson, Jay S. $e degree supervisor.
720 1 $a Richert, Brian T. $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 86-12.
790 $a 0183
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2025
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=32013774