東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Lessons for Insolvency Law from the ...

Grobler, Frederik,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Lessons for Insolvency Law from the Emoluments Attachment Order Experience /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Lessons for Insolvency Law from the Emoluments Attachment Order Experience // Frederik Grobler.
作者:	Grobler, Frederik,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (70 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International86-05.
標題:	Case law. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31726665
ISBN:	9798346578727

Lessons for Insolvency Law from the Emoluments Attachment Order Experience /
Grobler, Frederik,

Lessons for Insolvency Law from the Emoluments Attachment Order Experience /Frederik Grobler. - 1 electronic resource (70 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-05.

Section 23(5) of the Insolvency Act poses an interesting challenge, namely vesting a portion of an insolvent's post-sequestration income in the trustee of the insolvent estate without infringing on the insolvent's constitutional rights. The income earned by the insolvent during sequestration is in general excluded from his estate and does not vest in the trustee, unless the Master determines that a portion of the insolvent's income will not be required to maintain the insolvent and his dependents. In such a case, only the portion deemed to be surplus to requirements will be included in the insolvent estate and will vest in the trustee. The question of what role the insolvent's income should play during the sequestration process, and therefore how section 23(5) should be interpreted and applied, has vexed the courts and numerous practical and constitutional issues arise. This study examines the application and shortcomings of section 23(5) during the administration phase of the sequestration process. It then explores the lessons learned during the recent constitutional scrutiny and subsequent amendment of the emoluments attachment process. Lastly, recommendations are made for possible law reform of section 23(5).

English

ISBN: 9798346578727Subjects--Topical Terms:

3684068
Case law.

Lessons for Insolvency Law from the Emoluments Attachment Order Experience /
LDR:02555nmm a22004093i 4500 001 2435145
005 20251001062459.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798346578727
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31726665
035 $a (MiAaPQD)Pretoria226396889
035 $a AAI31726665
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Grobler, Frederik, $e author. $3 3825352
245 1 0 $a Lessons for Insolvency Law from the Emoluments Attachment Order Experience / $c Frederik Grobler.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (70 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-05.
500 $a Advisors: van Wyk, Jani S; Boraine, A.
502 $b LL.M. $c University of Pretoria (South Africa) $d 2024.
520 $a Section 23(5) of the Insolvency Act poses an interesting challenge, namely vesting a portion of an insolvent's post-sequestration income in the trustee of the insolvent estate without infringing on the insolvent's constitutional rights. The income earned by the insolvent during sequestration is in general excluded from his estate and does not vest in the trustee, unless the Master determines that a portion of the insolvent's income will not be required to maintain the insolvent and his dependents. In such a case, only the portion deemed to be surplus to requirements will be included in the insolvent estate and will vest in the trustee. The question of what role the insolvent's income should play during the sequestration process, and therefore how section 23(5) should be interpreted and applied, has vexed the courts and numerous practical and constitutional issues arise. This study examines the application and shortcomings of section 23(5) during the administration phase of the sequestration process. It then explores the lessons learned during the recent constitutional scrutiny and subsequent amendment of the emoluments attachment process. Lastly, recommendations are made for possible law reform of section 23(5).
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 6004
650 4 $a Case law. $3 3684068
650 4 $a Rehabilitation. $3 529790
650 4 $a Civil rights. $3 530268
650 4 $a Expenditures. $3 3556049
650 4 $a Legal aid. $3 1557387
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
690 $a 0510
690 $a 0629
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0454
710 2 $a University of Pretoria (South Africa). $b Procedural Law. $e degree granting institution. $3 3825353
720 1 $a van Wyk, Jani S $e degree supervisor.
720 1 $a Boraine, A. $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 86-05.
790 $a 6004
791 $a LL.M.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31726665