東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Level and Rule: A Theory of Democrac...

Fleischmann, Amir,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Level and Rule: A Theory of Democracy as Threat /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Level and Rule: A Theory of Democracy as Threat // Amir Fleischmann.
作者:	Fleischmann, Amir,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (176 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-11, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-11A.
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=32092596
ISBN:	9798314874547

Level and Rule: A Theory of Democracy as Threat /
Fleischmann, Amir,

Level and Rule: A Theory of Democracy as Threat /Amir Fleischmann. - 1 electronic resource (176 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-11, Section: A.

For thousands of years, democracy was understood-by proponents and opponents alike-as a system that would lead to the rule of the poor and the abolition of property. Given that the poor constitute the majority, it follows that they would act in their self-interest and use the power of democracy to seize property. In vastly different times and places, political theorists saw democracy as a threat that had to be contained. This dissertation is an investigation into that threat and the subject-the poor-expected to carry it out. I theorize the democratic threat by putting forward the concept of levelling. Levelling names the democratic practices that endeavour to negate the political power that wealth confers and foster the poor as a collective subject. It describes the redistribution or nullification of the kinds of property that confer political power on their owners and the building of alternative democratic structures through which the poor can exercise their own power. This concept allows me to make three contributions. First, it allows us to better understand fears expressed by propertied elites in numerous, dissimilar moments in the history of Western political thought. Second, the concept of levelling allows me to trace important shared features of movements that otherwise have little in common-in this case, the Russian Revolution and tenant struggles in New York. Third, by drawing our attention to the tension between democratic equality and the unequal political power derived from property, levelling encourages deeper analysis of the kinds of property that have this function. My introduction develops the concept of levelling and analyzes the different ways that property confers political power: over government, over society, and over individuals. I argue that levelling does not seek to redistribute property for its own sake but rather aims abolish property's ability to confer power on its owners. My first chapter engages in a deep reading of Aristotle, John Adams, and John Stuart Mill to understand what they found threatening about democracy and how they theorized the poor as democracy's central agent. I argue that while the poor once appeared as a pre-political entity, it is in fact a political subject, one that must be constituted through political action. My subsequent chapters are devoted to case studies of levelling movements. The second chapter examines the workers' councils of the 1905 and 1917 Russian Revolutions to understand the challenges confronting the poor when they attempted to rule. I show how the councils cultivated the poor as a political subject, attacked the nexus between power and property, and created an escalating confrontation with oligarchy. I also argue for a reassessment of the role of parties in the council movement, highlighting the duality of their role in the movement's initial success and eventual demise. My third chapter investigates the interwar tenant struggles in New York to understand the possibilities and perils facing movements that seek to establish levelling institutions where none existed. I argue that landlords wield political power over their tenants by dint of their ownership of rental property. This chapter also puts forward a proposal for tenant juries as a new type of institution-in the tradition of neo-plebeian thought-based on insights from the preceding analysis. My conclusion draws together insights from the case studies on the issue of movement politics versus institutional politics.

English

ISBN: 9798314874547Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Democracy

Level and Rule: A Theory of Democracy as Threat /
LDR:04968nmm a22004573i 4500 001 2434773
005 20250930134400.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2025 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798314874547
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI32092596
035 $a (MiAaPQD)umichrackham005984
035 $a AAI32092596
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Fleischmann, Amir, $e author. $3 3824866
245 1 0 $a Level and Rule: A Theory of Democracy as Threat / $c Amir Fleischmann.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2025
300 $a 1 electronic resource (176 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-11, Section: A.
500 $a Advisors: Disch, Lisa Jane Committee members: Anderson, Elizabeth S.; Herzog, Don; Temin, David Myer.
502 $b Ph.D. $c University of Michigan $d 2025.
520 $a For thousands of years, democracy was understood-by proponents and opponents alike-as a system that would lead to the rule of the poor and the abolition of property. Given that the poor constitute the majority, it follows that they would act in their self-interest and use the power of democracy to seize property. In vastly different times and places, political theorists saw democracy as a threat that had to be contained. This dissertation is an investigation into that threat and the subject-the poor-expected to carry it out. I theorize the democratic threat by putting forward the concept of levelling. Levelling names the democratic practices that endeavour to negate the political power that wealth confers and foster the poor as a collective subject. It describes the redistribution or nullification of the kinds of property that confer political power on their owners and the building of alternative democratic structures through which the poor can exercise their own power. This concept allows me to make three contributions. First, it allows us to better understand fears expressed by propertied elites in numerous, dissimilar moments in the history of Western political thought. Second, the concept of levelling allows me to trace important shared features of movements that otherwise have little in common-in this case, the Russian Revolution and tenant struggles in New York. Third, by drawing our attention to the tension between democratic equality and the unequal political power derived from property, levelling encourages deeper analysis of the kinds of property that have this function. My introduction develops the concept of levelling and analyzes the different ways that property confers political power: over government, over society, and over individuals. I argue that levelling does not seek to redistribute property for its own sake but rather aims abolish property's ability to confer power on its owners. My first chapter engages in a deep reading of Aristotle, John Adams, and John Stuart Mill to understand what they found threatening about democracy and how they theorized the poor as democracy's central agent. I argue that while the poor once appeared as a pre-political entity, it is in fact a political subject, one that must be constituted through political action. My subsequent chapters are devoted to case studies of levelling movements. The second chapter examines the workers' councils of the 1905 and 1917 Russian Revolutions to understand the challenges confronting the poor when they attempted to rule. I show how the councils cultivated the poor as a political subject, attacked the nexus between power and property, and created an escalating confrontation with oligarchy. I also argue for a reassessment of the role of parties in the council movement, highlighting the duality of their role in the movement's initial success and eventual demise. My third chapter investigates the interwar tenant struggles in New York to understand the possibilities and perils facing movements that seek to establish levelling institutions where none existed. I argue that landlords wield political power over their tenants by dint of their ownership of rental property. This chapter also puts forward a proposal for tenant juries as a new type of institution-in the tradition of neo-plebeian thought-based on insights from the preceding analysis. My conclusion draws together insights from the case studies on the issue of movement politics versus institutional politics.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0127
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Demography. $3 614991
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
653 $a Democracy
653 $a Political theory
653 $a Inequality
653 $a Oligarchy
653 $a Threat
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0938
710 2 $a University of Michigan. $b Political Science. $e degree granting institution. $3 3822517
720 1 $a Disch, Lisa Jane $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-11A.
790 $a 0127
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2025
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=32092596