東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Populism in America: Anti-Elitism an...

Brew, Brian M.,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Populism in America: Anti-Elitism and Anti-Pluralism in the United States /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Populism in America: Anti-Elitism and Anti-Pluralism in the United States // Brian M Brew.
作者:	Brew, Brian M.,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (302 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-11, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-11A.
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31937928
ISBN:	9798315712145

Populism in America: Anti-Elitism and Anti-Pluralism in the United States /
Brew, Brian M.,

Populism in America: Anti-Elitism and Anti-Pluralism in the United States /Brian M Brew. - 1 electronic resource (302 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-11, Section: A.

Populism has become a defining force in the politics of democratic nations the world over in the early 21st century, and the United States is no exception. I define populism as the notion that the government has sold out the "real" people of a nation in favor of some "other" group. I define populist rhetoric as that which is both anti-elite - targeting the government - and anti-plural - targeting some "other." I further identify three distinct strains of populist rhetoric - governmental, economic, and social - based on the group being assailed. I consider the place and prominence of populism in American politics across the nation's history. In the late 19th century, both parties used anti-elite and anti-plural cues strategically. In most cases, the party out of power used more populist rhetoric in its efforts to disparage its rival. The party in power used much more populist rhetoric in moments of national crisis. Populism remained a feature of American politics across the 20th century. In the early 21st century, changing political cleavages and a global recession left an immense audience receptive to populist politics. I assess the ways in which Democratic and Republican Senate candidates across eight states used populist rhetoric in their primary campaign messaging in 2022. I find that Republicans used far more social populist rhetoric than Democrats, and that Democrats employed far more economic populist messaging than Republicans. I also find significant variation in how candidates of the same party used populist cues. Finally, I use survey data to consider whether primary voters might use candidates' populist rhetoric as a heuristic. In primaries where populist rhetoric was a prominent part of the information environment and one candidate used substantially more populist messaging than the others, respondents with more populist views were substantively and significantly more likely to support the most populist candidate. This dissertation sheds light on a timely subject of superlative importance to contemporary American politics.

English

ISBN: 9798315712145Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

American political development

Populism in America: Anti-Elitism and Anti-Pluralism in the United States /
LDR:03588nmm a22004453i 4500 001 2434753
005 20250930134355.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2025 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798315712145
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31937928
035 $a AAI31937928
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Brew, Brian M., $e author. $3 3824839
245 1 0 $a Populism in America: Anti-Elitism and Anti-Pluralism in the United States / $c Brian M Brew.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2025
300 $a 1 electronic resource (302 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-11, Section: A.
500 $a Advisors: Roberts, Sarah Treul Committee members: Hetherington, Marc; Roberts, Jason; Andrews-Lee, Caitlin; Globetti, Suzanne.
502 $b Ph.D. $c The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill $d 2025.
520 $a Populism has become a defining force in the politics of democratic nations the world over in the early 21st century, and the United States is no exception. I define populism as the notion that the government has sold out the "real" people of a nation in favor of some "other" group. I define populist rhetoric as that which is both anti-elite - targeting the government - and anti-plural - targeting some "other." I further identify three distinct strains of populist rhetoric - governmental, economic, and social - based on the group being assailed. I consider the place and prominence of populism in American politics across the nation's history. In the late 19th century, both parties used anti-elite and anti-plural cues strategically. In most cases, the party out of power used more populist rhetoric in its efforts to disparage its rival. The party in power used much more populist rhetoric in moments of national crisis. Populism remained a feature of American politics across the 20th century. In the early 21st century, changing political cleavages and a global recession left an immense audience receptive to populist politics. I assess the ways in which Democratic and Republican Senate candidates across eight states used populist rhetoric in their primary campaign messaging in 2022. I find that Republicans used far more social populist rhetoric than Democrats, and that Democrats employed far more economic populist messaging than Republicans. I also find significant variation in how candidates of the same party used populist cues. Finally, I use survey data to consider whether primary voters might use candidates' populist rhetoric as a heuristic. In primaries where populist rhetoric was a prominent part of the information environment and one candidate used substantially more populist messaging than the others, respondents with more populist views were substantively and significantly more likely to support the most populist candidate. This dissertation sheds light on a timely subject of superlative importance to contemporary American politics.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0153
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
650 4 $a Public administration. $3 531287
650 4 $a American studies. $3 2122720
653 $a American political development
653 $a Campaigns
653 $a Elections
653 $a Political parties
653 $a Populism
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0323
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0681
710 2 $a The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. $b Political Science. $e degree granting institution. $3 3818927
720 1 $a Roberts, Sarah Treul $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-11A.
790 $a 0153
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2025
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31937928