東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Test-Retest Reliability and Influenc...

Duncan, Samantha,

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Test-Retest Reliability and Influence of Visual Constraint during Two Novel Reactive-Agility Tasks /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Test-Retest Reliability and Influence of Visual Constraint during Two Novel Reactive-Agility Tasks // Samantha Duncan.
Author:	Duncan, Samantha,
Description:	1 electronic resource (101 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International83-11.
Subject:	Neurosciences. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29221809
ISBN:	9798426837454

Test-Retest Reliability and Influence of Visual Constraint during Two Novel Reactive-Agility Tasks /
Duncan, Samantha,

Test-Retest Reliability and Influence of Visual Constraint during Two Novel Reactive-Agility Tasks /Samantha Duncan. - 1 electronic resource (101 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11.

Context: Patients continue to report high-reinjury rates, low rates of return to sport (RTS), and poor long-term function, with only 44-55% of athletes reaching full return to competitive sports. RTS tests inadvertently fail to consider the complex dynamics of sport (e.g. reactive and cognitive-motor demands associated with rapidly changing environment), which may threaten their utility in preventing subsequent injury.Objective: To establish within and between session test-retest reliability of two novel reactive agility tasks (Aim 1) and to assess the influence of a challenging visual constraint (e.g. stroboscopic visual field disruption) on participants? reaction time, time to target, total targets achieved and time to completion (Aim 2)Design: Descriptive case series with a test-retest design.Participants: Three healthy, physically active participants (Male n = 1 Female n = 2) aged 18-30 years old participated.Intervention: Participants completed two novel reactive agility tasks in a randomized order. Each participant completed 2 sessions approximately 7 days apart. Each session consisted of two sub-sessions that were identical excluding task order randomization and the addition of stroboscopic glasses during session 2b. After each task the participants completed the NASA-TLX survey.Main Outcome Measures: Task 1 outcomes included: Average Reaction Time (seconds), Average Time To Target (seconds), Number of Target Deactivations (n = #) Task 2 outcomes included: Average Time To Target (seconds), Number of Target Deactivations (n = #), Time to Completion (seconds). The NASA-TLX survey results were included as a secondary outcome measure for both tasks.Results: Overall, the ICC values for within and between session reliability of reaction time were moderate to weak and with wide confidence intervals (within: ICC = 0.782, 95% CI .000-.994, between: ICC = 0.318, 95% CI .000-.975). ICC values for time to completion, time to target and number of target deactivations within and between session reliability were moderate-excellent but with wide confidence intervals. The strobe condition did not impact reaction time but did seem to impact pursuit of target.Conclusion: Reaction time was not a reliable measure in this study. Time to target, time to completion and number of target deactivations had moderate-excellent reliability.

English

ISBN: 9798426837454Subjects--Topical Terms:

588700
Neurosciences.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Reactive agility

Test-Retest Reliability and Influence of Visual Constraint during Two Novel Reactive-Agility Tasks /
LDR:03893nmm a22004933i 4500 001 2433607
005 20250903054132.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2021 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798426837454
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI29221809
035 $a AAI29221809
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Duncan, Samantha, $e author. $3 3823296
245 1 0 $a Test-Retest Reliability and Influence of Visual Constraint during Two Novel Reactive-Agility Tasks / $c Samantha Duncan.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 1 electronic resource (101 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11.
500 $a Committee members: Norte, Grant; Bazett-Jones, David; Murray, Amanda.
502 $b M.S. $c The University of Toledo $d 2021.
520 $a Context: Patients continue to report high-reinjury rates, low rates of return to sport (RTS), and poor long-term function, with only 44-55% of athletes reaching full return to competitive sports. RTS tests inadvertently fail to consider the complex dynamics of sport (e.g. reactive and cognitive-motor demands associated with rapidly changing environment), which may threaten their utility in preventing subsequent injury.Objective: To establish within and between session test-retest reliability of two novel reactive agility tasks (Aim 1) and to assess the influence of a challenging visual constraint (e.g. stroboscopic visual field disruption) on participants? reaction time, time to target, total targets achieved and time to completion (Aim 2)Design: Descriptive case series with a test-retest design.Participants: Three healthy, physically active participants (Male n = 1 Female n = 2) aged 18-30 years old participated.Intervention: Participants completed two novel reactive agility tasks in a randomized order. Each participant completed 2 sessions approximately 7 days apart. Each session consisted of two sub-sessions that were identical excluding task order randomization and the addition of stroboscopic glasses during session 2b. After each task the participants completed the NASA-TLX survey.Main Outcome Measures: Task 1 outcomes included: Average Reaction Time (seconds), Average Time To Target (seconds), Number of Target Deactivations (n = #) Task 2 outcomes included: Average Time To Target (seconds), Number of Target Deactivations (n = #), Time to Completion (seconds). The NASA-TLX survey results were included as a secondary outcome measure for both tasks.Results: Overall, the ICC values for within and between session reliability of reaction time were moderate to weak and with wide confidence intervals (within: ICC = 0.782, 95% CI .000-.994, between: ICC = 0.318, 95% CI .000-.975). ICC values for time to completion, time to target and number of target deactivations within and between session reliability were moderate-excellent but with wide confidence intervals. The strobe condition did not impact reaction time but did seem to impact pursuit of target.Conclusion: Reaction time was not a reliable measure in this study. Time to target, time to completion and number of target deactivations had moderate-excellent reliability.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0232
650 4 $a Neurosciences. $3 588700
650 4 $a Kinesiology. $3 517627
650 4 $a Medicine. $3 641104
650 4 $a Physical therapy. $3 588713
650 4 $a Health sciences. $3 3168359
650 4 $a Health care management. $3 2122906
653 $a Reactive agility
653 $a Stroboscopic visual field disruption
653 $a Neurocognitive
653 $a Reaction time
653 $a Neuromotor
653 $a Return to sport
653 $a Test battery
653 $a Athletic training
690 $a 0566
690 $a 0317
690 $a 0382
690 $a 0769
690 $a 0575
690 $a 0564
710 2 $a The University of Toledo. $b Exercise Science. $e degree granting institution. $3 3814462
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 83-11.
790 $a 0232
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2021
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29221809