Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
Who Pays for a Clean Economy? Assess...
~
McKenna, Claire,
Linked to FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Who Pays for a Clean Economy? Assessing the Household Accessibility of Residential Climate Action in Michigan /
Record Type:
Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
Who Pays for a Clean Economy? Assessing the Household Accessibility of Residential Climate Action in Michigan // Claire McKenna.
Author:
McKenna, Claire,
Description:
1 electronic resource (180 pages)
Notes:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International86-07B.
Subject:
Environmental studies. -
Online resource:
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31871386
ISBN:
9798346890782
Who Pays for a Clean Economy? Assessing the Household Accessibility of Residential Climate Action in Michigan /
McKenna, Claire,
Who Pays for a Clean Economy? Assessing the Household Accessibility of Residential Climate Action in Michigan /
Claire McKenna. - 1 electronic resource (180 pages)
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: B.
Decarbonizing the U.S. residential sector is a complex problem whose solutions are entangled by intersectional societal dilemmas: climate change and economic disparity. Transitioning from combustion heat sources to electric-powered heat pumps for space heating is at the core of government policies and programs designed to reduce emissions in accordance with the Paris Agreement. Implementation of these plans will require significant market disruption in contractor services, manufacturer offerings, and customer choice, as well as an epic shift in the electricity sector to provide reliable, emissions-free power at affordable rates. The persistent inequality in access to quality housing in the U.S. could worsen because financial and institutional resources already available to promote new heating technology adoption have been shown to have lower rates of uptake in disadvantaged communities. This dissertation examines what stands in the way of equitable adoption of heat pumps in cold climates and tests ways of reducing disparate access across income. During a two-year field study, I analyzed utility bills, thermostat settings, and energy burdens as well as conducted energy assessments and provided retrofit recommendations for a sample of 51 households in Michigan, half below median income. I find that below-median income households would see a median energy burden rise from 6% to 10% if they shifted to electric heat pumps from natural gas. Weatherization could offset this increase, bringing burdens down to pre-electrification levels. However, median payback for weatherization is 24 years, making retrofits infeasible for lower-income households. Our results are indicative of an energy poverty trap that could hinder an equitable energy transition. I examined this trap using a qualitative analysis of the household experience with home energy audits. With interviews of participants conducted one year after they received audits, I characterized the steps they took towards home energy retrofits and the factors affecting their progress. I found that households with money hired a contractor and therefore had access to higher quality services. More often, high costs deterred households from even considering retrofits. Those who attempted do-it-yourself retrofits often failed to complete them upon facing unexpected installation challenges or underestimating the scarcity of their time. Next, I explored the hypothesis that the tradeoff between energy cost and space temperature is harsher for less efficient homes. I began by seeking to identify the homes in the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's ResStock database of nationally representative archetypical homes that closely matched our sample and then assess the cost-temperature tradeoff for those homes. I found that it was impossible to find homes that matched both the actual consumption and building characteristics of the homes in our sample. I concluded ResStock is a useful tool for assessing aggregate regional energy, but it may obscure the dynamics of energy insecurity, like monthly energy costs. Finally, I propose an alternative to using only indoor temperatures as a proxy for occupant goals. I performed a literature review summarizing the state of practice for residential behavior modeling. I explored occupant objectives and strategies occupants deploy to achieve them with a mixed-methods analysis of thermostat management behavior, energy insecurity coping behavior, and their interaction using interview data and thermostat data. In conclusion, I proposed a research agenda for developing a new model capable of analyzing tradeoffs between household preference for energy cost, thermal comfort, and societal impact measured as greenhouse gas emissions and utility grid resiliency.
English
ISBN: 9798346890782Subjects--Topical Terms:
2122803
Environmental studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Fuel switching
Who Pays for a Clean Economy? Assessing the Household Accessibility of Residential Climate Action in Michigan /
LDR
:05449nmm a22004813i 4500
001
2432488
005
20250707081513.5
006
m o d
007
cr|nu||||||||
008
261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020
$a
9798346890782
035
$a
(MiAaPQD)AAI31871386
035
$a
(MiAaPQD)umichrackham005873
035
$a
AAI31871386
040
$a
MiAaPQD
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQD
$e
rda
100
1
$a
McKenna, Claire,
$e
author.
$3
3821724
245
1 0
$a
Who Pays for a Clean Economy? Assessing the Household Accessibility of Residential Climate Action in Michigan /
$c
Claire McKenna.
264
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2024
300
$a
1 electronic resource (180 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: B.
500
$a
Advisors: Vaishnav, Parth T.; Gronlund, Carina J. Committee members: Hernandez, Diana; Miller, Shelie A.; Whyte, Kyle P.
502
$b
Ph.D.
$c
University of Michigan
$d
2024.
520
$a
Decarbonizing the U.S. residential sector is a complex problem whose solutions are entangled by intersectional societal dilemmas: climate change and economic disparity. Transitioning from combustion heat sources to electric-powered heat pumps for space heating is at the core of government policies and programs designed to reduce emissions in accordance with the Paris Agreement. Implementation of these plans will require significant market disruption in contractor services, manufacturer offerings, and customer choice, as well as an epic shift in the electricity sector to provide reliable, emissions-free power at affordable rates. The persistent inequality in access to quality housing in the U.S. could worsen because financial and institutional resources already available to promote new heating technology adoption have been shown to have lower rates of uptake in disadvantaged communities. This dissertation examines what stands in the way of equitable adoption of heat pumps in cold climates and tests ways of reducing disparate access across income. During a two-year field study, I analyzed utility bills, thermostat settings, and energy burdens as well as conducted energy assessments and provided retrofit recommendations for a sample of 51 households in Michigan, half below median income. I find that below-median income households would see a median energy burden rise from 6% to 10% if they shifted to electric heat pumps from natural gas. Weatherization could offset this increase, bringing burdens down to pre-electrification levels. However, median payback for weatherization is 24 years, making retrofits infeasible for lower-income households. Our results are indicative of an energy poverty trap that could hinder an equitable energy transition. I examined this trap using a qualitative analysis of the household experience with home energy audits. With interviews of participants conducted one year after they received audits, I characterized the steps they took towards home energy retrofits and the factors affecting their progress. I found that households with money hired a contractor and therefore had access to higher quality services. More often, high costs deterred households from even considering retrofits. Those who attempted do-it-yourself retrofits often failed to complete them upon facing unexpected installation challenges or underestimating the scarcity of their time. Next, I explored the hypothesis that the tradeoff between energy cost and space temperature is harsher for less efficient homes. I began by seeking to identify the homes in the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's ResStock database of nationally representative archetypical homes that closely matched our sample and then assess the cost-temperature tradeoff for those homes. I found that it was impossible to find homes that matched both the actual consumption and building characteristics of the homes in our sample. I concluded ResStock is a useful tool for assessing aggregate regional energy, but it may obscure the dynamics of energy insecurity, like monthly energy costs. Finally, I propose an alternative to using only indoor temperatures as a proxy for occupant goals. I performed a literature review summarizing the state of practice for residential behavior modeling. I explored occupant objectives and strategies occupants deploy to achieve them with a mixed-methods analysis of thermostat management behavior, energy insecurity coping behavior, and their interaction using interview data and thermostat data. In conclusion, I proposed a research agenda for developing a new model capable of analyzing tradeoffs between household preference for energy cost, thermal comfort, and societal impact measured as greenhouse gas emissions and utility grid resiliency.
546
$a
English
590
$a
School code: 0127
650
4
$a
Environmental studies.
$3
2122803
650
4
$a
Architectural engineering.
$3
3174102
650
4
$a
Sustainability.
$3
1029978
650
4
$a
Energy.
$3
876794
653
$a
Fuel switching
653
$a
Energy efficiency
653
$a
Energy insecurity
653
$a
Home energy retrofits
653
$a
Residential sector
690
$a
0640
690
$a
0477
690
$a
0462
690
$a
0501
690
$a
0791
710
2
$a
University of Michigan.
$b
Resource Policy & Behavior PhD.
$e
degree granting institution.
$3
3821056
720
1
$a
Vaishnav, Parth T.
$e
degree supervisor.
720
1
$a
Gronlund, Carina J.
$e
degree supervisor.
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
86-07B.
790
$a
0127
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2024
856
4 0
$u
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31871386
based on 0 review(s)
Location:
ALL
電子資源
Year:
Volume Number:
Items
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Inventory Number
Location Name
Item Class
Material type
Call number
Usage Class
Loan Status
No. of reservations
Opac note
Attachments
W9528183
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
On shelf
0
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login