東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Speech and Text Psychometrics: Ident...

Low, Daniel Mark,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Speech and Text Psychometrics: Identifying Suicide Risk Factors With Large Language Models and Acoustic Networks /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Speech and Text Psychometrics: Identifying Suicide Risk Factors With Large Language Models and Acoustic Networks // Daniel Mark Low.
作者:	Low, Daniel Mark,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (219 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-12B.
標題:	Biomedical engineering. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31296406
ISBN:	9798382785332

Speech and Text Psychometrics: Identifying Suicide Risk Factors With Large Language Models and Acoustic Networks /
Low, Daniel Mark,

Speech and Text Psychometrics: Identifying Suicide Risk Factors With Large Language Models and Acoustic Networks /Daniel Mark Low. - 1 electronic resource (219 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.

Suicide is among the leading causes of death worldwide, with about one death every 11 minutes in the US in recent years. Suicide risk factors such as suicidal ideation, loneliness, and hopelessness have been mainly assessed through rating scales and clinical interviews, which have generally had low accuracy in predicting suicide. One challenge is that suicidal symptoms can be sudden and may not be present during a clinical interview. Another challenge is that many individuals are not receiving regular treatment to be assessed in the first place. Automated risk assessments of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) and their risk factors could be done more continuously and ecologically outside the clinic by using the speech and text data individuals produce naturally when they use social media, message a friend, journal, or use a crisis counseling service. Clinical assessments could also be enhanced by using speech and text data from therapy sessions and electronic health records. With recent advances in artificial intelligence, this seems promising, but how will we know whether these novel tools are valid? Psychological assessments using speech and natural language processing are generally not evaluated for the types of validity typically expected from screening questionnaires that use rating scales. This may be due to a gap between these fields and psychometrics. This dissertation seeks to bridge this gap. In chapter 1, I use generative AI to automatically build a Suicide Risk Lexicon of 49 risk factors for STBs. This results in an interpretable baseline model that can guarantee flagging certain high-risk language. I validate it with clinician judgments and by demonstrating it can predict imminent suicide risk during crisis counseling sessions.In chapter 2, I try to consolidate Text Psychometrics as the field that studies how to measure psychological constructs in text. I systematically compare a diverse set of models including lexicons, zero-shot deep learning methods, and generative AI on different desirable properties in their ability to predict 13 types of mental health crises. I evaluate clinical utility and introduce content validity test sets as a way to demonstrate whether models detect key expressions of the target variable.In chapter 3, to overcome that fact most approaches to suicide risk assessment use rating scales that simply capture the presence or frequency of STBs, we ask something that is relatively unknown: what are the actual thoughts in suicidal thinking? Participants with STBs answer this question over multiple days, and we compare the validity of categorizing their responses through theory-driven and data-driven methods. Our results reveal that measuring natural language through open-response questions captures suicidal ideation that rating scales miss.In Chapter 4, I analyze the speech patterns of individuals during and after their hospitalizations for suicide risk through daily recordings. I estimate networks of acoustic and psychological variables to capture the dynamic nature of how these variables affect each other over time. I provide a Suicide Speech Model to help explain potential mechanisms by which speech biomarkers could detect changes in STBs.In sum, I provide new methods to measure psychological constructs using speech and text data and lay out novel frameworks to validate these measurements more thoroughly.

English

ISBN: 9798382785332Subjects--Topical Terms:

535387
Biomedical engineering.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Generative AI

Speech and Text Psychometrics: Identifying Suicide Risk Factors With Large Language Models and Acoustic Networks /
LDR:04987nmm a22004693i 4500 001 2432206
005 20250707081319.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798382785332
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31296406
035 $a AAI31296406
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Low, Daniel Mark, $e author. $0 (orcid)0000-0002-8866-8667 $3 3821353
245 1 0 $a Speech and Text Psychometrics: Identifying Suicide Risk Factors With Large Language Models and Acoustic Networks / $c Daniel Mark Low.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (219 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.
500 $a Advisors: Ghosh, Satrajit Committee members: Mehta, Daryush; Liebenthal, Einat; Corcoran, Cheryl; Jurgens, David.
502 $b Ph.D. $c Harvard University $d 2024.
520 $a Suicide is among the leading causes of death worldwide, with about one death every 11 minutes in the US in recent years. Suicide risk factors such as suicidal ideation, loneliness, and hopelessness have been mainly assessed through rating scales and clinical interviews, which have generally had low accuracy in predicting suicide. One challenge is that suicidal symptoms can be sudden and may not be present during a clinical interview. Another challenge is that many individuals are not receiving regular treatment to be assessed in the first place. Automated risk assessments of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) and their risk factors could be done more continuously and ecologically outside the clinic by using the speech and text data individuals produce naturally when they use social media, message a friend, journal, or use a crisis counseling service. Clinical assessments could also be enhanced by using speech and text data from therapy sessions and electronic health records. With recent advances in artificial intelligence, this seems promising, but how will we know whether these novel tools are valid? Psychological assessments using speech and natural language processing are generally not evaluated for the types of validity typically expected from screening questionnaires that use rating scales. This may be due to a gap between these fields and psychometrics. This dissertation seeks to bridge this gap. In chapter 1, I use generative AI to automatically build a Suicide Risk Lexicon of 49 risk factors for STBs. This results in an interpretable baseline model that can guarantee flagging certain high-risk language. I validate it with clinician judgments and by demonstrating it can predict imminent suicide risk during crisis counseling sessions.In chapter 2, I try to consolidate Text Psychometrics as the field that studies how to measure psychological constructs in text. I systematically compare a diverse set of models including lexicons, zero-shot deep learning methods, and generative AI on different desirable properties in their ability to predict 13 types of mental health crises. I evaluate clinical utility and introduce content validity test sets as a way to demonstrate whether models detect key expressions of the target variable.In chapter 3, to overcome that fact most approaches to suicide risk assessment use rating scales that simply capture the presence or frequency of STBs, we ask something that is relatively unknown: what are the actual thoughts in suicidal thinking? Participants with STBs answer this question over multiple days, and we compare the validity of categorizing their responses through theory-driven and data-driven methods. Our results reveal that measuring natural language through open-response questions captures suicidal ideation that rating scales miss.In Chapter 4, I analyze the speech patterns of individuals during and after their hospitalizations for suicide risk through daily recordings. I estimate networks of acoustic and psychological variables to capture the dynamic nature of how these variables affect each other over time. I provide a Suicide Speech Model to help explain potential mechanisms by which speech biomarkers could detect changes in STBs.In sum, I provide new methods to measure psychological constructs using speech and text data and lay out novel frameworks to validate these measurements more thoroughly.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0084
650 4 $a Biomedical engineering. $3 535387
650 4 $a Quantitative psychology. $3 2144748
650 4 $a Mental health. $3 534751
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
653 $a Generative AI
653 $a Large language models
653 $a Natural language processing
653 $a Speech
653 $a Suicide
653 $a Suicidal thoughts and behaviors
690 $a 0800
690 $a 0541
690 $a 0632
690 $a 0347
690 $a 0384
710 2 $a Harvard University. $b Medical Sciences. $e degree granting institution. $3 3815464
720 1 $a Ghosh, Satrajit $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-12B.
790 $a 0084
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31296406