東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Comparative Analysis of Refusal of T...

Szarkiszjan, Martin,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Comparative Analysis of Refusal of Trade Mark Registration on Moral and Public Policy Grounds in Japan and the United Kingdom /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Comparative Analysis of Refusal of Trade Mark Registration on Moral and Public Policy Grounds in Japan and the United Kingdom // Martin Szarkiszjan.
作者:	Szarkiszjan, Martin,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (396 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-10, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-10A.
標題:	Culture. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31923322
ISBN:	9798311908191

Comparative Analysis of Refusal of Trade Mark Registration on Moral and Public Policy Grounds in Japan and the United Kingdom /
Szarkiszjan, Martin,

Comparative Analysis of Refusal of Trade Mark Registration on Moral and Public Policy Grounds in Japan and the United Kingdom /Martin Szarkiszjan. - 1 electronic resource (396 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-10, Section: A.

This thesis is a comparative, jurisprudential work, dedicated to the exposition and comparative analysis of the trade mark regimes of the United Kingdom and Japan, in the context of the Absolute and Public Policy grounds for refusal to register a trade mark.Based on the comparative and legal-theoretical analysis, the author has found that there are numerous points of legal convergence and divergence between the two jurisdictions. However, there are considerable differences in the pattern of divergence and convergence in terms of the cause and reason behind instances of convergence or divergence.Much of the divergence is in the area of the protection of unregistered marks, whereas there is considerable convergence in the protection of registered trade marks. The divergence in the area of unregistered marks, however, is proportionately less significant. The protection for unregistered marks account for the exception to the rule, and because of the inexpensive nature of trade mark registration and the availability of trade marks, the divergence is less prominent overall.There is a common and pervasive notion in the historic scholarship about the Japanese disposition, especially towards litigation and conciliation. Japanese people are incorrectly portrayed as litigation-averse. The true cause of the suppressed litigation rates in Japan is availability, including due to the pre-war suppression of the legal profession and judicial activity.Finally, the World Intellectual Property Organization and the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights are responsible for a harmonising effect in the area of trade mark law. The trade mark regimes of the UK and Japan are thus harmonised, to some extent. However, these factors cannot account for the entirety of the harmonisation, as the contemporary reified, registration-based model had existed in Japan and the UK prior to the inception of WIPO or the TRIPS agreement.

English

ISBN: 9798311908191Subjects--Topical Terms:

517003
Culture.

Comparative Analysis of Refusal of Trade Mark Registration on Moral and Public Policy Grounds in Japan and the United Kingdom /
LDR:03315nmm a22003853i 4500 001 2432170
005 20250626110620.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798311908191
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31923322
035 $a AAI31923322
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Szarkiszjan, Martin, $e author. $3 3821309
245 1 0 $a Comparative Analysis of Refusal of Trade Mark Registration on Moral and Public Policy Grounds in Japan and the United Kingdom / $c Martin Szarkiszjan.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (396 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-10, Section: A.
500 $a Advisors: Denoncourt, Janice; Ferris, Graham.
502 $b Ph.D. $c Nottingham Trent University (United Kingdom) $d 2024.
520 $a This thesis is a comparative, jurisprudential work, dedicated to the exposition and comparative analysis of the trade mark regimes of the United Kingdom and Japan, in the context of the Absolute and Public Policy grounds for refusal to register a trade mark.Based on the comparative and legal-theoretical analysis, the author has found that there are numerous points of legal convergence and divergence between the two jurisdictions. However, there are considerable differences in the pattern of divergence and convergence in terms of the cause and reason behind instances of convergence or divergence.Much of the divergence is in the area of the protection of unregistered marks, whereas there is considerable convergence in the protection of registered trade marks. The divergence in the area of unregistered marks, however, is proportionately less significant. The protection for unregistered marks account for the exception to the rule, and because of the inexpensive nature of trade mark registration and the availability of trade marks, the divergence is less prominent overall.There is a common and pervasive notion in the historic scholarship about the Japanese disposition, especially towards litigation and conciliation. Japanese people are incorrectly portrayed as litigation-averse. The true cause of the suppressed litigation rates in Japan is availability, including due to the pre-war suppression of the legal profession and judicial activity.Finally, the World Intellectual Property Organization and the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights are responsible for a harmonising effect in the area of trade mark law. The trade mark regimes of the UK and Japan are thus harmonised, to some extent. However, these factors cannot account for the entirety of the harmonisation, as the contemporary reified, registration-based model had existed in Japan and the UK prior to the inception of WIPO or the TRIPS agreement.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 8745
650 4 $a Culture. $3 517003
650 4 $a Writing. $3 551664
650 4 $a Credibility. $3 3560860
650 4 $a Registration. $3 3682192
650 4 $a Morality. $3 3561985
650 4 $a Reputations. $3 3562920
650 4 $a Intellectual property. $3 572975
650 4 $a Society. $3 700566
650 4 $a Fame. $3 598236
650 4 $a Jurisdiction. $3 890764
650 4 $a Legislation. $3 766385
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Civil law. $3 768128
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0513
710 2 $a Nottingham Trent University (United Kingdom). $e degree granting institution. $3 3759125
720 1 $a Denoncourt, Janice $e degree supervisor.
720 1 $a Ferris, Graham $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-10A.
790 $a 8745
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31923322