東華大學圖書館 |

The Copyright Eligibility of the Output of Text-To-Image Models: A New Challenge to the Originality Requirement /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Copyright Eligibility of the Output of Text-To-Image Models: A New Challenge to the Originality Requirement // Laura Fonteneau.
作者:	Fonteneau, Laura,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (33 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International86-04.
標題:	Journalism. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31580489
ISBN:	9798342189378

The Copyright Eligibility of the Output of Text-To-Image Models: A New Challenge to the Originality Requirement /
Fonteneau, Laura,

The Copyright Eligibility of the Output of Text-To-Image Models: A New Challenge to the Originality Requirement /Laura Fonteneau. - 1 electronic resource (33 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-04.

From the self-driving car fantasy to the human-beating chess-playing computer, passing through the automatic language translator, Artificial Intelligence (hereinafter: AI) technologies are already widely spread. They are not yet omnipresent, but every day shaping a new reality. At a mind-altering pace, more and more areas of our daily lives are touched by the occurring digital shift.Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google LLC, said that he believed the democratization of AI will revolutionize our world. He goes as far as being quoted at the 2018 Wold Economic Forum saying 'AI is one of the most profound things we're working on as humanity. It's more profound than fire or electricity". While still in their infancy, AI-driven technologies are already causing concerns in multiple domains. Sundar Pichai himself warned that it would be necessary for nations to ally in order not to get overwhelmed by the technological revolution AI represents . In the same way the leaders of the world joined to try and tackle the issue that climate change represents, there would be a need for the creation of a global framework and ground rules, one of them being the demilitarization of AI.If AI is the life-altering tool we now believe it to be, and if the changes it already made in our lives are barely a starting point, one can only wonder if what seemed a dystopian scenario merely a few decades ago could now be turned into a reality. The continuous drift in our approach to the human-computer relationships is changing society by translating into laws, and embedding AI technologies in our future. An easy way to notice the rise of AI is seeing it has been the subject of a significant amount of investment, both from companies and countries. In 2014, more than $300 million was invested in AI-related startups, which is a 300% increase, compared to 2013. This translates into number the of changes seen in real life. The discovery of a new fire is of interest to a lot of people, and they want to be a part of it.Within the incredible amount of domains AI can be applied to, artistic creation often goes under-looked. The conversations usually focus on the wildest futuristic, yet highly practical and pragmatic, dreams of robotic surgeons or self-driving cars. Art is only a minuscule part of a much wider scope of opportunities and possibilities. Nevertheless, it might be one of the most interesting doors opened by the democratization of the use of AI when it comes to the law, and more specifically when it comes to intellectual property law.For this reason, the focus of this study will be AI-generated art, and how the production of literary and artistic work by and with AI could shake the field of intellectual property law. As will be covered in this paper later, the notions of creativity and originality are central to the attribution of copyright. To be determined copyright eligible, an artwork has to meet a certain amount of requirements. The question of the legal protection of the byproducts of Artificial Intelligence deserves a closer inspection.It is important to note that not every human creation is deemed copyright eligible. While the criteria around the globe are usually fairly wide and on the more protectionist side, they still exist and restrict some works of art from being copyrighted. What matters is to determine whether the copyright laws currently in place can withstand the technological shift occurring.To study the impact of AI in the domain of arts, one should consider admitting that the topic is not completely devoid of moral and ethical questioning. The capacity of creation is usually seen as intrinsically human. While furthering oneself from any kind of legal matter, and entering the realm of philosophy, this reasoning does impact how we approach the idea of AI-generated art. It fosters an interesting conversation about the concept of authorship and the interpretations of copyright laws. Forcing the search for the identity of the author, and the definition of a work of art means challenging copyright laws as we know them. While completely stripping moral and ethical questioning is barely possible, there is a legal conversation to be had.In the essay Life, Art and America,the novelist Theodore Dreiser wrote: 'Art is the stored honey of the human soul' 4 . In this piece dating back to 1917, the author did not mean to relate to the digital revolution we are living in. His essay on censorship and the media in the United States, nonetheless, does reflect on the uneasiness felt by some when it comes to AI-generated art. Naturally, it does raise questions. The reasoning being it is that if art belongs to humanity, or even what makes us humans and what lifts us beyond mere animals, it means that this ability could not be taken away from us. Humanity has been 'gatekeeping' creative thinking, and the arrival of Artificial Intelligence, mimicking the human brain and its way of functioning, on the terrain of art, has more than one person worried.

English

ISBN: 9798342189378Subjects--Topical Terms:

576107
Journalism.

The Copyright Eligibility of the Output of Text-To-Image Models: A New Challenge to the Originality Requirement /
LDR:06302nmm a22003973i 4500 001 2432121
005 20250626110609.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2023 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798342189378
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31580489
035 $a (MiAaPQD)Portugal104001445913
035 $a AAI31580489
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Fonteneau, Laura, $e author. $3 3821237
245 1 0 $a The Copyright Eligibility of the Output of Text-To-Image Models: A New Challenge to the Originality Requirement / $c Laura Fonteneau.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 1 electronic resource (33 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-04.
500 $a Advisors: Rendas, Tito.
502 $b LL.M. $c Universidade Catolica Portuguesa (Portugal) $d 2023.
520 $a From the self-driving car fantasy to the human-beating chess-playing computer, passing through the automatic language translator, Artificial Intelligence (hereinafter: AI) technologies are already widely spread. They are not yet omnipresent, but every day shaping a new reality. At a mind-altering pace, more and more areas of our daily lives are touched by the occurring digital shift.Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google LLC, said that he believed the democratization of AI will revolutionize our world. He goes as far as being quoted at the 2018 Wold Economic Forum saying 'AI is one of the most profound things we're working on as humanity. It's more profound than fire or electricity". While still in their infancy, AI-driven technologies are already causing concerns in multiple domains. Sundar Pichai himself warned that it would be necessary for nations to ally in order not to get overwhelmed by the technological revolution AI represents . In the same way the leaders of the world joined to try and tackle the issue that climate change represents, there would be a need for the creation of a global framework and ground rules, one of them being the demilitarization of AI.If AI is the life-altering tool we now believe it to be, and if the changes it already made in our lives are barely a starting point, one can only wonder if what seemed a dystopian scenario merely a few decades ago could now be turned into a reality. The continuous drift in our approach to the human-computer relationships is changing society by translating into laws, and embedding AI technologies in our future. An easy way to notice the rise of AI is seeing it has been the subject of a significant amount of investment, both from companies and countries. In 2014, more than $300 million was invested in AI-related startups, which is a 300% increase, compared to 2013. This translates into number the of changes seen in real life. The discovery of a new fire is of interest to a lot of people, and they want to be a part of it.Within the incredible amount of domains AI can be applied to, artistic creation often goes under-looked. The conversations usually focus on the wildest futuristic, yet highly practical and pragmatic, dreams of robotic surgeons or self-driving cars. Art is only a minuscule part of a much wider scope of opportunities and possibilities. Nevertheless, it might be one of the most interesting doors opened by the democratization of the use of AI when it comes to the law, and more specifically when it comes to intellectual property law.For this reason, the focus of this study will be AI-generated art, and how the production of literary and artistic work by and with AI could shake the field of intellectual property law. As will be covered in this paper later, the notions of creativity and originality are central to the attribution of copyright. To be determined copyright eligible, an artwork has to meet a certain amount of requirements. The question of the legal protection of the byproducts of Artificial Intelligence deserves a closer inspection.It is important to note that not every human creation is deemed copyright eligible. While the criteria around the globe are usually fairly wide and on the more protectionist side, they still exist and restrict some works of art from being copyrighted. What matters is to determine whether the copyright laws currently in place can withstand the technological shift occurring.To study the impact of AI in the domain of arts, one should consider admitting that the topic is not completely devoid of moral and ethical questioning. The capacity of creation is usually seen as intrinsically human. While furthering oneself from any kind of legal matter, and entering the realm of philosophy, this reasoning does impact how we approach the idea of AI-generated art. It fosters an interesting conversation about the concept of authorship and the interpretations of copyright laws. Forcing the search for the identity of the author, and the definition of a work of art means challenging copyright laws as we know them. While completely stripping moral and ethical questioning is barely possible, there is a legal conversation to be had.In the essay Life, Art and America,the novelist Theodore Dreiser wrote: 'Art is the stored honey of the human soul' 4 . In this piece dating back to 1917, the author did not mean to relate to the digital revolution we are living in. His essay on censorship and the media in the United States, nonetheless, does reflect on the uneasiness felt by some when it comes to AI-generated art. Naturally, it does raise questions. The reasoning being it is that if art belongs to humanity, or even what makes us humans and what lifts us beyond mere animals, it means that this ability could not be taken away from us. Humanity has been 'gatekeeping' creative thinking, and the arrival of Artificial Intelligence, mimicking the human brain and its way of functioning, on the terrain of art, has more than one person worried.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 7020
650 4 $a Journalism. $3 576107
650 4 $a Artists. $3 524768
650 4 $a Neural networks. $3 677449
650 4 $a Intellectual property. $3 572975
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
690 $a 0800
690 $a 0391
690 $a 0513
690 $a 0398
710 2 $a Universidade Catolica Portuguesa (Portugal). $e degree granting institution. $3 3771925
720 1 $a Rendas, Tito $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 86-04.
790 $a 7020
791 $a LL.M.
792 $a 2023
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31580489