東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A Quantitative Causal Comparative St...

Beatty-Cipoletti, Rae Ann,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Quantitative Causal Comparative Study: A Bullying Intervention on Grades and Attendance /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Quantitative Causal Comparative Study: A Bullying Intervention on Grades and Attendance // Rae Ann Beatty-Cipoletti.
作者:	Beatty-Cipoletti, Rae Ann,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (210 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-05, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-05B.
標題:	Psychology. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28153876
ISBN:	9798691230813

A Quantitative Causal Comparative Study: A Bullying Intervention on Grades and Attendance /
Beatty-Cipoletti, Rae Ann,

A Quantitative Causal Comparative Study: A Bullying Intervention on Grades and Attendance /Rae Ann Beatty-Cipoletti. - 1 electronic resource (210 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-05, Section: B.

While educators seek ways to combat bullying problems in adolescents, increase school attendance, and improve grades, current research looks to establish if a significant difference exists pre-post intervention of a bullying intervention program for adolescent students. The purpose of this quantitative, causal comparative study was to determine if and to what extent there was a difference in student academic performance and attendance between those students grades 6-12 who attended 100% of the sessions of a district-sponsored bullying intervention program and those students grades 6-12 who participated in 50% or fewer of the sessions, after covarying out the effect of pre-test report card scores and pre-attendance rate in a northeastern suburban West Virginia school district. This study was based on Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory involving modeling of appropriate responses to being bullied so the adolescent could learn by observation. The researcher gathered archival data from a state educational database to answer the three overarching research questions to determine if a significant difference exists between pre-post intervention This research utilized the ANCOVA test to determine the difference in pretest/posttest scores for the sample of adolescents' grades 6-8 comprised in the study. The control group was n = 38 and the intervention group was n = 39. The results indicated that there was no statistically significant difference in the posttest math scores between the students in the control group and in the intervention group, F(1, 74) = 2.36, p = 0.13 and that there was no statistically significant difference in the posttest reading and language scores between the students in the control group and in the intervention group, F(1, 74) = 3.35, p = 0.07. The findings may prompt school leaders to thoroughly evaluate the rigor, framework, and development of their bullying intervention programs to determine if they make a difference in their students' lives.

English

ISBN: 9798691230813Subjects--Topical Terms:

519075
Psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Academic achievement

A Quantitative Causal Comparative Study: A Bullying Intervention on Grades and Attendance /
LDR:03586nmm a22004813i 4500 001 2432017
005 20250626110544.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2020 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798691230813
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI28153876
035 $a AAI28153876
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Beatty-Cipoletti, Rae Ann, $e author. $3 3821093
245 1 2 $a A Quantitative Causal Comparative Study: A Bullying Intervention on Grades and Attendance / $c Rae Ann Beatty-Cipoletti.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 1 electronic resource (210 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-05, Section: B.
500 $a Advisors: Hester, Bridgette M. Committee members: Whitehead, Richard L.; LaChapelle, Peter.
502 $b Ph.D. $c Grand Canyon University $d 2020.
520 $a While educators seek ways to combat bullying problems in adolescents, increase school attendance, and improve grades, current research looks to establish if a significant difference exists pre-post intervention of a bullying intervention program for adolescent students. The purpose of this quantitative, causal comparative study was to determine if and to what extent there was a difference in student academic performance and attendance between those students grades 6-12 who attended 100% of the sessions of a district-sponsored bullying intervention program and those students grades 6-12 who participated in 50% or fewer of the sessions, after covarying out the effect of pre-test report card scores and pre-attendance rate in a northeastern suburban West Virginia school district. This study was based on Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory involving modeling of appropriate responses to being bullied so the adolescent could learn by observation. The researcher gathered archival data from a state educational database to answer the three overarching research questions to determine if a significant difference exists between pre-post intervention This research utilized the ANCOVA test to determine the difference in pretest/posttest scores for the sample of adolescents' grades 6-8 comprised in the study. The control group was n = 38 and the intervention group was n = 39. The results indicated that there was no statistically significant difference in the posttest math scores between the students in the control group and in the intervention group, F(1, 74) = 2.36, p = 0.13 and that there was no statistically significant difference in the posttest reading and language scores between the students in the control group and in the intervention group, F(1, 74) = 3.35, p = 0.07. The findings may prompt school leaders to thoroughly evaluate the rigor, framework, and development of their bullying intervention programs to determine if they make a difference in their students' lives.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 1582
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Social sciences education. $3 2144735
650 4 $a Educational administration. $3 2122799
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 2191387
650 4 $a Counseling psychology. $3 924824
650 4 $a Social studies education. $3 3422293
653 $a Academic achievement
653 $a Bullying intervention
653 $a Causal-comparative
653 $a Intervention programs
653 $a School attendance
653 $a Grade improvement
653 $a West Virginia
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0534
690 $a 0514
690 $a 0603
690 $a 0458
710 2 $a Grand Canyon University. $b College of Doctoral Studies. $e degree granting institution. $3 3759077
720 1 $a Hester, Bridgette M. $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-05B.
790 $a 1582
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28153876