語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
A Quantitative Causal-Comparative St...
~
Goger, Carla Anita,
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
A Quantitative Causal-Comparative Study of Occupational Self-Efficacy Beliefs for Acquisition Professionals After Completing Professional Credentials Designed for the Knowledge or Performance Dimension /
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
A Quantitative Causal-Comparative Study of Occupational Self-Efficacy Beliefs for Acquisition Professionals After Completing Professional Credentials Designed for the Knowledge or Performance Dimension // Carla Anita Goger.
作者:
Goger, Carla Anita,
面頁冊數:
1 electronic resource (158 pages)
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-10, Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International86-10A.
標題:
Instructional design. -
電子資源:
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31932657
ISBN:
9798310300613
A Quantitative Causal-Comparative Study of Occupational Self-Efficacy Beliefs for Acquisition Professionals After Completing Professional Credentials Designed for the Knowledge or Performance Dimension /
Goger, Carla Anita,
A Quantitative Causal-Comparative Study of Occupational Self-Efficacy Beliefs for Acquisition Professionals After Completing Professional Credentials Designed for the Knowledge or Performance Dimension /
Carla Anita Goger. - 1 electronic resource (158 pages)
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-10, Section: A.
The purpose of this quantitative, causal-comparative study is to explore the impact between credential programs designed for the knowledge or performance dimension and whether there is a difference in how those designs affect defense acquisition professionals' occupational selfefficacy beliefs and whether the years of professional experience affect those results. This study endeavors to contribute to the field of education by shedding light on the relationship between the design of professional credential programs and occupational self-efficacy beliefs within the approximate 19,000 members of the defense acquisition workforce who have attained a credential since 2019. The occupational self-efficacy short-form (OSS-6) questionnaire was used to collect data electronically and analyzed using a two-way ANOVA followed by the Scheirer-Ray Hare test. The results of this study included the failure to reject both two of the three null hypotheses and revealed significant differences significant differences in occupational self-efficacy scores between individuals with under 10 years of professional experience and those with 10-15 years (p = .021), as well as a significant difference between individuals with under 10 years of professional experience and those with 20 or more years (p < .001). The study concludes that years of professional experience significantly impact occupational self-efficacy among defense acquisition professionals, while credential type has a limited influence. Recommendations for future research include exploring the broader implications of occupational self-efficacy, the role of professional credentials, and the application of Bloom's taxonomy in classifying credentials.
English
ISBN: 9798310300613Subjects--Topical Terms:
3172279
Instructional design.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Bloom's taxonomy
A Quantitative Causal-Comparative Study of Occupational Self-Efficacy Beliefs for Acquisition Professionals After Completing Professional Credentials Designed for the Knowledge or Performance Dimension /
LDR
:03271nmm a22004333i 4500
001
2431818
005
20250624130458.5
006
m o d
007
cr|nu||||||||
008
261011s2025 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020
$a
9798310300613
035
$a
(MiAaPQD)AAI31932657
035
$a
AAI31932657
040
$a
MiAaPQD
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQD
$e
rda
100
1
$a
Goger, Carla Anita,
$e
author.
$0
(orcid)0009-0006-3080-9531
$3
3820800
245
1 2
$a
A Quantitative Causal-Comparative Study of Occupational Self-Efficacy Beliefs for Acquisition Professionals After Completing Professional Credentials Designed for the Knowledge or Performance Dimension /
$c
Carla Anita Goger.
264
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2025
300
$a
1 electronic resource (158 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-10, Section: A.
500
$a
Advisors: Struble, Kevin Committee members: Foster, Lisa.
502
$b
D.Phil.
$c
Liberty University
$d
2025.
520
$a
The purpose of this quantitative, causal-comparative study is to explore the impact between credential programs designed for the knowledge or performance dimension and whether there is a difference in how those designs affect defense acquisition professionals' occupational selfefficacy beliefs and whether the years of professional experience affect those results. This study endeavors to contribute to the field of education by shedding light on the relationship between the design of professional credential programs and occupational self-efficacy beliefs within the approximate 19,000 members of the defense acquisition workforce who have attained a credential since 2019. The occupational self-efficacy short-form (OSS-6) questionnaire was used to collect data electronically and analyzed using a two-way ANOVA followed by the Scheirer-Ray Hare test. The results of this study included the failure to reject both two of the three null hypotheses and revealed significant differences significant differences in occupational self-efficacy scores between individuals with under 10 years of professional experience and those with 10-15 years (p = .021), as well as a significant difference between individuals with under 10 years of professional experience and those with 20 or more years (p < .001). The study concludes that years of professional experience significantly impact occupational self-efficacy among defense acquisition professionals, while credential type has a limited influence. Recommendations for future research include exploring the broader implications of occupational self-efficacy, the role of professional credentials, and the application of Bloom's taxonomy in classifying credentials.
546
$a
English
590
$a
School code: 1052
650
4
$a
Instructional design.
$3
3172279
650
4
$a
Curriculum development.
$3
684418
650
4
$a
Adult education.
$3
543202
653
$a
Bloom's taxonomy
653
$a
Credentials
653
$a
Defense acquisition workforce
653
$a
Occupational self-efficacy
653
$a
Professional experience
690
$a
0447
690
$a
0727
690
$a
0516
710
2
$a
Liberty University.
$b
School of Education.
$e
degree granting institution.
$3
3819501
720
1
$a
Struble, Kevin
$e
degree supervisor.
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
86-10A.
790
$a
1052
791
$a
D.Phil.
792
$a
2025
856
4 0
$u
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31932657
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9527513
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入