東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Self Directed Learning/Self-Regulate...

Li, Ang,

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Self Directed Learning/Self-Regulated Learning in Computer Simulated Environments /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Self Directed Learning/Self-Regulated Learning in Computer Simulated Environments // Ang Li.
Author:	Li, Ang,
Description:	1 electronic resource (154 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-07B.
Subject:	Educational psychology. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31769064
ISBN:	9798302180674

Self Directed Learning/Self-Regulated Learning in Computer Simulated Environments /
Li, Ang,

Self Directed Learning/Self-Regulated Learning in Computer Simulated Environments /Ang Li. - 1 electronic resource (154 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: B.

Computer-based learning environments (CBLEs), such as game-based learning and simulation-based learning, provide learners the learning platform to self-manage their learning, including setting their own goals, selecting learning strategies, and attributing time to tasks or elements of learning tasks based on their judgment and needs, which will encourage leaners' agency of active involvement in the learning, boost their learning motivation and engagement, and require more self-regulated learning (SRL) skills. This study investigates the impact of self-managed learning within computer-simulated environments designed for complex scientific discovery. Using Zimmerman's cyclical self-regulated learning framework and goal-setting theory, the study explores how autonomy in learning- specifically through self-directed goal setting, time management, and strategy use-affects learning outcomes, judgment accuracy, and SRL behaviors. Experiment 1 reveals that learners who were free to self-pace their learning and determine the sequence of their tasks achieved significantly higher test scores than those in time- and order-yoked conditions. Experiment 2 mainly explores how goals could best support learners in self-regulated learning in the computer-simulated environment. The results indicate that when learners have specific goals, no matter if the goals were set by the learners or given to them, they demonstrate better learning outcomes. The findings underscore the importance of autonomy in enhancing SRL and indicate that clear, specific goals, whether self-determined or assigned, lead to better learning outcomes than general goals.Additionally, my study has identified five distinct SRL learner profiles. These profiles identified learners as "EXPERT SRL LEARNERS," who employ comprehensive strategies and achieve high test scores; "EFFICIENT STRATEGY-DRIVEN LEARNERS," who effectively use time to maximize their learning and have a high reliance on using prediction and summarization strategies; "BALANCED BUT TIME-INTENSIVE LEARNERS," who has a medium level of the test score, however, spend a longer time studying; "INCONSISTENT SRL LEARNERS," whose learning outcome is below average and frequently using strategies such as prior knowledge and prediction; and "Ineffective SRL Learners," who has a low test score and not often using any of these learning strategies. I have also found that learners have distinct motivational beliefs among these different profiles, such as their self-efficacy and goal orientation beliefs. The results suggested that promoting and training learners in self-efficacy, mastery goal setting, and effective SRL strategies are critical for academic success, especially in complex, computer-based learning environments. My research will contribute to understanding how self-regulatory processes and motivational factors interact to influence learning in technology-enhanced education and offers practical implications for designing interventions that support diverse learner needs.

English

ISBN: 9798302180674Subjects--Topical Terms:

517650
Educational psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Computer- simulated environments

Self Directed Learning/Self-Regulated Learning in Computer Simulated Environments /
LDR:04521nmm a22004453i 4500 001 2431680
005 20250616055555.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798302180674
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31769064
035 $a AAI31769064
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Li, Ang, $e author. $3 3820604
245 1 0 $a Self Directed Learning/Self-Regulated Learning in Computer Simulated Environments / $c Ang Li.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (154 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: B.
500 $a Advisors: Tullis, Jonathan Committee members: Burross, Heidi; Pope, Elizabeth J.
502 $b Ph.D. $c The University of Arizona $d 2024.
520 $a Computer-based learning environments (CBLEs), such as game-based learning and simulation-based learning, provide learners the learning platform to self-manage their learning, including setting their own goals, selecting learning strategies, and attributing time to tasks or elements of learning tasks based on their judgment and needs, which will encourage leaners' agency of active involvement in the learning, boost their learning motivation and engagement, and require more self-regulated learning (SRL) skills. This study investigates the impact of self-managed learning within computer-simulated environments designed for complex scientific discovery. Using Zimmerman's cyclical self-regulated learning framework and goal-setting theory, the study explores how autonomy in learning- specifically through self-directed goal setting, time management, and strategy use-affects learning outcomes, judgment accuracy, and SRL behaviors. Experiment 1 reveals that learners who were free to self-pace their learning and determine the sequence of their tasks achieved significantly higher test scores than those in time- and order-yoked conditions. Experiment 2 mainly explores how goals could best support learners in self-regulated learning in the computer-simulated environment. The results indicate that when learners have specific goals, no matter if the goals were set by the learners or given to them, they demonstrate better learning outcomes. The findings underscore the importance of autonomy in enhancing SRL and indicate that clear, specific goals, whether self-determined or assigned, lead to better learning outcomes than general goals.Additionally, my study has identified five distinct SRL learner profiles. These profiles identified learners as "EXPERT SRL LEARNERS," who employ comprehensive strategies and achieve high test scores; "EFFICIENT STRATEGY-DRIVEN LEARNERS," who effectively use time to maximize their learning and have a high reliance on using prediction and summarization strategies; "BALANCED BUT TIME-INTENSIVE LEARNERS," who has a medium level of the test score, however, spend a longer time studying; "INCONSISTENT SRL LEARNERS," whose learning outcome is below average and frequently using strategies such as prior knowledge and prediction; and "Ineffective SRL Learners," who has a low test score and not often using any of these learning strategies. I have also found that learners have distinct motivational beliefs among these different profiles, such as their self-efficacy and goal orientation beliefs. The results suggested that promoting and training learners in self-efficacy, mastery goal setting, and effective SRL strategies are critical for academic success, especially in complex, computer-based learning environments. My research will contribute to understanding how self-regulatory processes and motivational factors interact to influence learning in technology-enhanced education and offers practical implications for designing interventions that support diverse learner needs.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0009
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Computer science. $3 523869
653 $a Computer- simulated environments
653 $a Game based learning
653 $a Goal setting
653 $a Judgment of learning
653 $a Learning strategies
653 $a Self-regulated learning
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0984
690 $a 0710
710 2 $a The University of Arizona. $b Educational Psychology. $e degree granting institution. $3 3820605
720 1 $a Tullis, Jonathan $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-07B.
790 $a 0009
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31769064