東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

A Descriptive Study of Doctoral Grad...

Blount, Amanda Nicole,

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Descriptive Study of Doctoral Graduates' Perceptions of Mentoring by Their Dissertation Chairs /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	A Descriptive Study of Doctoral Graduates' Perceptions of Mentoring by Their Dissertation Chairs // Amanda Nicole Blount.
Author:	Blount, Amanda Nicole,
Description:	1 electronic resource (95 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-09, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-09A.
Subject:	Higher education. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28968818
ISBN:	9798790667695

A Descriptive Study of Doctoral Graduates' Perceptions of Mentoring by Their Dissertation Chairs /
Blount, Amanda Nicole,

A Descriptive Study of Doctoral Graduates' Perceptions of Mentoring by Their Dissertation Chairs /Amanda Nicole Blount. - 1 electronic resource (95 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-09, Section: A.

The purpose of this non-experimental study was to examine doctoral graduates' satisfaction with the mentoring provided by their dissertation chairs. The relationships between doctoral students and their dissertation chairs can positively or negatively influence a doctoral student's dissertation journey. The researcher developed and validated a survey to determine doctoral graduates' perceptions of mentoring by their dissertation chairs based on best practices in the literature. The online survey was announced nationwide using email and social media: 133 graduates from multiple disciplines and institutions responded with complete data. The responses were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The results of the analyses revealed that this sample of graduates viewed their chair's mentoring as helpful or very helpful during the different phases of the dissertation process (M = 2.92 on a 4-point Likert scale). The graduates also agreed or strongly agreed that their chairs used best practices of mentoring doctoral graduates (M = 4.12 on a 5-point Likert scale). Analyses of open-ended survey items reiterated the importance of the relationships between doctoral students and their chairs to promote the successful completion of the dissertation. Graduates valued mutual trust, encouragement, goal setting, shared research interests, and timely feedback. Implications of the study and recommendations for future research were discussed.

English

ISBN: 9798790667695Subjects--Topical Terms:

641065
Higher education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

dissertation chair

A Descriptive Study of Doctoral Graduates' Perceptions of Mentoring by Their Dissertation Chairs /
LDR:03028nmm a22004813i 4500 001 2431394
005 20250616055138.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2022 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798790667695
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI28968818
035 $a AAI28968818
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Blount, Amanda Nicole, $e author. $3 3820175
245 1 2 $a A Descriptive Study of Doctoral Graduates' Perceptions of Mentoring by Their Dissertation Chairs / $c Amanda Nicole Blount.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 1 electronic resource (95 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-09, Section: A.
500 $a Advisors: LeBlanc, Patty Committee members: Gollery, Thomas; Bryant, Mark.
502 $b Ed.D. $c Southeastern University $d 2022.
520 $a The purpose of this non-experimental study was to examine doctoral graduates' satisfaction with the mentoring provided by their dissertation chairs. The relationships between doctoral students and their dissertation chairs can positively or negatively influence a doctoral student's dissertation journey. The researcher developed and validated a survey to determine doctoral graduates' perceptions of mentoring by their dissertation chairs based on best practices in the literature. The online survey was announced nationwide using email and social media: 133 graduates from multiple disciplines and institutions responded with complete data. The responses were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The results of the analyses revealed that this sample of graduates viewed their chair's mentoring as helpful or very helpful during the different phases of the dissertation process (M = 2.92 on a 4-point Likert scale). The graduates also agreed or strongly agreed that their chairs used best practices of mentoring doctoral graduates (M = 4.12 on a 5-point Likert scale). Analyses of open-ended survey items reiterated the importance of the relationships between doctoral students and their chairs to promote the successful completion of the dissertation. Graduates valued mutual trust, encouragement, goal setting, shared research interests, and timely feedback. Implications of the study and recommendations for future research were discussed.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0606
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Adult education. $3 543202
650 4 $a Educational evaluation. $3 526425
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
650 4 $a School counseling. $3 2144793
653 $a dissertation chair
653 $a doctoral program completion
653 $a doctoral student
653 $a mentoring
653 $a more knowledgeable other (MKO)
653 $a online mentoring
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0516
690 $a 0443
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0519
710 2 $a Southeastern University. $b College of Education. $e degree granting institution. $3 3820176
720 1 $a LeBlanc, Patty $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-09A.
790 $a 0606
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2022
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28968818