東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A Systematic Examination of Practice...

Welsh, Mackenzie,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Systematic Examination of Practice Amount in Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) Treatment Using an Integral Stimulation Approach /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Systematic Examination of Practice Amount in Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) Treatment Using an Integral Stimulation Approach // Mackenzie Welsh.
作者:	Welsh, Mackenzie,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (69 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International79-04.
標題:	Speech therapy. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10601719
ISBN:	9780355171778

A Systematic Examination of Practice Amount in Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) Treatment Using an Integral Stimulation Approach /
Welsh, Mackenzie,

A Systematic Examination of Practice Amount in Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) Treatment Using an Integral Stimulation Approach /Mackenzie Welsh. - 1 electronic resource (69 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04.

The purpose of this study was to examine how a critical principle of motor learning, practice amount (high number of trials versus a low number of trials), affects speech motor learning in childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). It also sought to contribute to the literature base regarding using an integral stimulation approach for these children. Currently, a limited evidence base exists for decision-making regarding practice amount in CAS treatment. Using a single-case experimental design with two participants, three target sets of utterances (High Amount, Low Amount, and Control) received different amounts of treatment. Outcomes were compared in terms of retention. Targets were scored regarding perceptual (prosodic and segmental) accuracy. Effect sizes were computed to quantify the extent of treatment effects. For both participants, results show some evidence suggesting a higher amount of practice is advantageous and leads to greater learning. A low amount of treatment did not show clear differences compared to not receiving any treatment. Caution should be taken when interpreting these findings due to its small sample size and modest effects. Results suggest that the integral stimulation approach may only be effective if provided with a significantly high amount of practice. Further research is needed to examine how the principles of motor learning and the integral stimulation approach should be sensibly and systematically applied to promote best outcomes for this population.

English

ISBN: 9780355171778Subjects--Topical Terms:

520446
Speech therapy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Childhood apraxia of speech

A Systematic Examination of Practice Amount in Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) Treatment Using an Integral Stimulation Approach /
LDR:03065nmm a22004453i 4500 001 2431371
005 20250616055131.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2017 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9780355171778
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI10601719
035 $a (MiAaPQD)temple:13041
035 $a AAI10601719
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Welsh, Mackenzie, $e author. $3 3820139
245 1 2 $a A Systematic Examination of Practice Amount in Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) Treatment Using an Integral Stimulation Approach / $c Mackenzie Welsh.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 1 electronic resource (69 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisors: Maas, Edwin Committee members: Kohen, Francine; Reilly, Jamie.
502 $b M.A. $c Temple University $d 2017.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to examine how a critical principle of motor learning, practice amount (high number of trials versus a low number of trials), affects speech motor learning in childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). It also sought to contribute to the literature base regarding using an integral stimulation approach for these children. Currently, a limited evidence base exists for decision-making regarding practice amount in CAS treatment. Using a single-case experimental design with two participants, three target sets of utterances (High Amount, Low Amount, and Control) received different amounts of treatment. Outcomes were compared in terms of retention. Targets were scored regarding perceptual (prosodic and segmental) accuracy. Effect sizes were computed to quantify the extent of treatment effects. For both participants, results show some evidence suggesting a higher amount of practice is advantageous and leads to greater learning. A low amount of treatment did not show clear differences compared to not receiving any treatment. Caution should be taken when interpreting these findings due to its small sample size and modest effects. Results suggest that the integral stimulation approach may only be effective if provided with a significantly high amount of practice. Further research is needed to examine how the principles of motor learning and the integral stimulation approach should be sensibly and systematically applied to promote best outcomes for this population.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0225
650 4 $a Speech therapy. $3 520446
653 $a Childhood apraxia of speech
653 $a Motor speech disorders
653 $a Practice amount
653 $a Principles of motor learning
653 $a Speech sound disorders
653 $a Speech-language pathology
690 $a 0460
710 2 $a Temple University. $b Communication Sciences. $e degree granting institution. $3 3820140
720 1 $a Maas, Edwin $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 79-04.
790 $a 0225
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2017
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10601719