東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Political-Military Integration: The ...

Haelig, Carlton G.,

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Political-Military Integration: The Relationship Between National Security Strategy and Changes in Military Doctrine in the United States Army and Marine Corps /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Political-Military Integration: The Relationship Between National Security Strategy and Changes in Military Doctrine in the United States Army and Marine Corps // Carlton G Haelig.
Author:	Haelig, Carlton G.,
Description:	1 electronic resource (460 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-03A.
Subject:	History. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30632714
ISBN:	9798380416368

Political-Military Integration: The Relationship Between National Security Strategy and Changes in Military Doctrine in the United States Army and Marine Corps /
Haelig, Carlton G.,

Political-Military Integration: The Relationship Between National Security Strategy and Changes in Military Doctrine in the United States Army and Marine Corps /Carlton G Haelig. - 1 electronic resource (460 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: A.

This dissertation analyzes the interaction of changes in national security strategy with changes in individual military services' operational concepts and doctrine. It expands on existing analyses of changes in American grand strategy by focusing specifically on the responses of the United States military services to those changes. While a robust body of work exists on strategy and military innovation, much less research exists on the relationship between the two. The dissertation's theoretical framework explains how changes in grand strategy affect changes in military service behavior, how and why military services push back against changes in grand strategy, and how military services may independently influence changes in grand strategy by developing new warfighting and power projection capabilities. This dissertation draws on theory-based historical analysis to execute comparative case study research designs using archival sources-many of them recently declassified and being used in academic research for the first time. It relies on organizational theory, bureaucratic politics, civil-military relations, and international security studies to develop a set of hypotheses regarding when and why we should expect to see particular reactions from a given military service to a change in security strategy. These responses range from inaction or insubordination to pursuing radical change meant to integrate the service with new strategic objectives. Crucially, these outcomes also vary depending on the type of grand strategy pursued and how civilian officials implement that strategy. The empirical analysis includes seven case studies ranging from the Army and Marine Corps responses to the New Look strategy enacted in 1953 to the Army and Marine Corps efforts to shape American strategy in the 1980s with their respective AirLand Battle and Maneuver Warfare concepts.

English

ISBN: 9798380416368Subjects--Topical Terms:

516518
History.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Army

Political-Military Integration: The Relationship Between National Security Strategy and Changes in Military Doctrine in the United States Army and Marine Corps /
LDR:03433nmm a22004453i 4500 001 2430441
005 20250527055020.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2023 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798380416368
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI30632714
035 $a AAI30632714
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Haelig, Carlton G., $e author. $3 3818760
245 1 0 $a Political-Military Integration: The Relationship Between National Security Strategy and Changes in Military Doctrine in the United States Army and Marine Corps / $c Carlton G Haelig.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 1 electronic resource (460 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisors: Friedberg, Aaron L. Committee members: Ikenberry, John; Hunzeker, Michael; Centeno, Miguel.
502 $b Ph.D. $c Princeton University $d 2023.
520 $a This dissertation analyzes the interaction of changes in national security strategy with changes in individual military services' operational concepts and doctrine. It expands on existing analyses of changes in American grand strategy by focusing specifically on the responses of the United States military services to those changes. While a robust body of work exists on strategy and military innovation, much less research exists on the relationship between the two. The dissertation's theoretical framework explains how changes in grand strategy affect changes in military service behavior, how and why military services push back against changes in grand strategy, and how military services may independently influence changes in grand strategy by developing new warfighting and power projection capabilities. This dissertation draws on theory-based historical analysis to execute comparative case study research designs using archival sources-many of them recently declassified and being used in academic research for the first time. It relies on organizational theory, bureaucratic politics, civil-military relations, and international security studies to develop a set of hypotheses regarding when and why we should expect to see particular reactions from a given military service to a change in security strategy. These responses range from inaction or insubordination to pursuing radical change meant to integrate the service with new strategic objectives. Crucially, these outcomes also vary depending on the type of grand strategy pursued and how civilian officials implement that strategy. The empirical analysis includes seven case studies ranging from the Army and Marine Corps responses to the New Look strategy enacted in 1953 to the Army and Marine Corps efforts to shape American strategy in the 1980s with their respective AirLand Battle and Maneuver Warfare concepts.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0181
650 4 $a History. $3 516518
650 4 $a Public administration. $3 531287
650 4 $a Military studies. $3 2197382
653 $a Army
653 $a Cold War
653 $a Marine Corps
653 $a Military innovation
653 $a American grand strategy
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0578
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0750
710 2 $a Princeton University. $b Politics. $e degree granting institution. $3 3818761
720 1 $a Friedberg, Aaron L. $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-03A.
790 $a 0181
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30632714