東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A Theoretical Framework for Professi...

Graham, Bruce Michael,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Theoretical Framework for Professional Development Program Evaluation and the Creation of an Associated Evaluation Tool /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Theoretical Framework for Professional Development Program Evaluation and the Creation of an Associated Evaluation Tool // Bruce Michael Graham.
作者:	Graham, Bruce Michael,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (82 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-05.
標題:	Mathematics education. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30673763
ISBN:	9798380712507

A Theoretical Framework for Professional Development Program Evaluation and the Creation of an Associated Evaluation Tool /
Graham, Bruce Michael,

A Theoretical Framework for Professional Development Program Evaluation and the Creation of an Associated Evaluation Tool /Bruce Michael Graham. - 1 electronic resource (82 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-05.

Research has shown that access to high-quality professional development leads to improvement in teachers' practice and improvements in student learning outcomes. However, teachers continue to experience ineffective professional development on a regular basis and often have no say in the types of professional development in which they participate. This paper reviews the literature on effective professional development, with a particular focus on mathematics professional development, and merges the findings into a theoretical framework for professional development program evaluation. The framework is built around six different aspects of professional development: (1) Alignment to professional goals, (2) Focus on content and pedagogical knowledge, (3) Promotion of active learning and collaboration, (4) Duration and type, (5) Support from experts and opportunities for teacher leadership, and (6) A plan for professional development program evaluation. The paper also creates a professional development program evaluation tool that teachers can use to evaluate the quality of their professional development. The paper then provides an example of using the evaluation tool with an analysis of the results. Several next steps for future research are also discussed. After reading this paper, math teachers, and teachers in general, should be able to use the evaluation tool as a way to determine the quality of the professional development in which they participate.

English

ISBN: 9798380712507Subjects--Topical Terms:

641129
Mathematics education.

A Theoretical Framework for Professional Development Program Evaluation and the Creation of an Associated Evaluation Tool /
LDR:02866nmm a22004213i 4500 001 2430360
005 20250519115949.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2023 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798380712507
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI30673763
035 $a (MiAaPQD)NCState_Univ18402041131
035 $a AAI30673763
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Graham, Bruce Michael, $e author. $3 3818636
245 1 2 $a A Theoretical Framework for Professional Development Program Evaluation and the Creation of an Associated Evaluation Tool / $c Bruce Michael Graham.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 1 electronic resource (82 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-05.
500 $a Advisors: Krupa, Erin Committee members: Ellis, Ruby; Mojica, Gemma.
502 $b M.S. $c North Carolina State University $d 2023.
520 $a Research has shown that access to high-quality professional development leads to improvement in teachers' practice and improvements in student learning outcomes. However, teachers continue to experience ineffective professional development on a regular basis and often have no say in the types of professional development in which they participate. This paper reviews the literature on effective professional development, with a particular focus on mathematics professional development, and merges the findings into a theoretical framework for professional development program evaluation. The framework is built around six different aspects of professional development: (1) Alignment to professional goals, (2) Focus on content and pedagogical knowledge, (3) Promotion of active learning and collaboration, (4) Duration and type, (5) Support from experts and opportunities for teacher leadership, and (6) A plan for professional development program evaluation. The paper also creates a professional development program evaluation tool that teachers can use to evaluate the quality of their professional development. The paper then provides an example of using the evaluation tool with an analysis of the results. Several next steps for future research are also discussed. After reading this paper, math teachers, and teachers in general, should be able to use the evaluation tool as a way to determine the quality of the professional development in which they participate.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0155
650 4 $a Mathematics education. $3 641129
650 4 $a Education reform. $3 3557624
650 4 $a Design. $3 518875
650 4 $a Science education. $3 521340
650 4 $a Mathematics teachers. $3 1027582
650 4 $a Continuing education. $3 527504
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 2191387
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0714
690 $a 0280
690 $a 0651
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0458
710 2 $a North Carolina State University. $e degree granting institution. $3 3765716
720 1 $a Krupa, Erin $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-05.
790 $a 0155
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2023
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30673763