東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Presidential Unilateralism in Contem...

Wang, Miao Alfred,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Presidential Unilateralism in Contemporary U.S. Trade Policymaking: An Analysis of the Section 232 Tariff Exclusion Process by the Trump Administration /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Presidential Unilateralism in Contemporary U.S. Trade Policymaking: An Analysis of the Section 232 Tariff Exclusion Process by the Trump Administration // Miao Alfred Wang.
作者:	Wang, Miao Alfred,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (162 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-04, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-04A.
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31482081
ISBN:	9798896076933

Presidential Unilateralism in Contemporary U.S. Trade Policymaking: An Analysis of the Section 232 Tariff Exclusion Process by the Trump Administration /
Wang, Miao Alfred,

Presidential Unilateralism in Contemporary U.S. Trade Policymaking: An Analysis of the Section 232 Tariff Exclusion Process by the Trump Administration /Miao Alfred Wang. - 1 electronic resource (162 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-04, Section: A.

On March 1, 2018, President Trump declared a 25% tariff on certain steel imports by invoking Section 232 of the 1962 Trade Expansion Act. Despite the extraordinary tariff measure, my research with logit regression and negative binomial regression analysis finds that the Trump Administration in its tariff exclusion process favored constituencies with a higher share of the president's supporters and allowed import products from China more likely to receive the exclusions. I argue that the Trump Administration took these contradictory trade actions to achieve multiple goals at the same time: to pressure foreign trade partners and to protect vulnerable domestic industries on the one hand and to avoid hurting domestic users of the tariffed products on the other hand. Prioritizing supporters maximizes the electoral utility of each tariff exclusion. The favorable treatment of Chinese steel imports particularly suggests that domestic electoral concerns were at least as important as foreign policy considerations in the Trump Administration's processing of tariff exclusion requests.

English

ISBN: 9798896076933Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Congress

Presidential Unilateralism in Contemporary U.S. Trade Policymaking: An Analysis of the Section 232 Tariff Exclusion Process by the Trump Administration /
LDR:02625nmm a22004333i 4500 001 2429975
005 20250519114743.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798896076933
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31482081
035 $a AAI31482081
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Wang, Miao Alfred, $e author. $3 3818081
245 1 0 $a Presidential Unilateralism in Contemporary U.S. Trade Policymaking: An Analysis of the Section 232 Tariff Exclusion Process by the Trump Administration / $c Miao Alfred Wang.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (162 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-04, Section: A.
500 $a Advisors: Rocca, Michael Committee members: Krebs, Timothy; Butler, Christopher; Wang, Xiaoyang.
502 $b Ph.D. $c The University of New Mexico $d 2024.
520 $a On March 1, 2018, President Trump declared a 25% tariff on certain steel imports by invoking Section 232 of the 1962 Trade Expansion Act. Despite the extraordinary tariff measure, my research with logit regression and negative binomial regression analysis finds that the Trump Administration in its tariff exclusion process favored constituencies with a higher share of the president's supporters and allowed import products from China more likely to receive the exclusions. I argue that the Trump Administration took these contradictory trade actions to achieve multiple goals at the same time: to pressure foreign trade partners and to protect vulnerable domestic industries on the one hand and to avoid hurting domestic users of the tariffed products on the other hand. Prioritizing supporters maximizes the electoral utility of each tariff exclusion. The favorable treatment of Chinese steel imports particularly suggests that domestic electoral concerns were at least as important as foreign policy considerations in the Trump Administration's processing of tariff exclusion requests.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0142
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Public administration. $3 531287
650 4 $a American studies. $3 2122720
653 $a Congress
653 $a Presidential unilateral actions
653 $a Tariff exclusions
653 $a Trade policy
653 $a Binomial regression
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0323
690 $a 0617
710 2 $a The University of New Mexico. $b Political Science. $e degree granting institution. $3 3818082
720 1 $a Rocca, Michael $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-04A.
790 $a 0142
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31482081