東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Right to Family: Reproductive an...

Moring, Nechama F. Sammet,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Right to Family: Reproductive and Disability Justice, Reproductive Health, Care and Coercion Among Structurally Marginalized Populations /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Right to Family: Reproductive and Disability Justice, Reproductive Health, Care and Coercion Among Structurally Marginalized Populations // Nechama F. Sammet Moring.
作者:	Moring, Nechama F. Sammet,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (390 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-07A.
標題:	Disability studies. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31636842
ISBN:	9798346893844

The Right to Family: Reproductive and Disability Justice, Reproductive Health, Care and Coercion Among Structurally Marginalized Populations /
Moring, Nechama F. Sammet,

The Right to Family: Reproductive and Disability Justice, Reproductive Health, Care and Coercion Among Structurally Marginalized Populations /Nechama F. Sammet Moring. - 1 electronic resource (390 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: A.

The right to contraception and abortion is fundamental, and a focus of mainstream white feminist policy advocacy efforts. However, the right to create families on our own terms is a less often discussed, but equally important element of reproductive justice, given the U.S.'s long history of eugenics and forced sterilization targeting racialized, queer, trans, disabled and other structurally marginalized populations. Reproductive justice (RJ), an activist-scholar tradition developed by Black women and people of marginalized genders, focuses on the human right of all people to bodily autonomy, including reproductive autonomy; to have children, to not have children, to parent the children we have and to create family on our own terms, in safe and sustainable communities free from state violence, including the violence of poverty. RJ is under-utilized in the academy, though it offers an important, holistic and history-informed lens that considers the power relationships and systems of oppression that are institutionalized across all areas of U.S. life and policy. Like disability justice, a "sibling" activist-scholar tradition also developed by activists of color, RJ considers relationships and community as important units of analysis.This dissertation utilizes RJ frameworks to analyze three examples of reproductive in/justice. First, I use Medicare provider data to conduct a descriptive analysis of reproductive health procedure utilization among people with disabilities severe enough to qualify for Medicare before age 65. The reproductive health of this population is often ignored, despite the numerous health inequities noted among disabled populations in general. This analysis provides a "lay of the land" overview to inform future studies and efforts to reduce inequities and increase autonomy in this population.Next, I explore quinacrine sterilization (QS), and the relatively recent, flawed research that enabled it, conducted mostly by two charismatic American "population scientists" and their mentees. QS is an easy to perform but risky sterilization procedure that was used widely - and often coercively - across the imperialized Global South. By analyzing the biased research that justified and enabled QS, despite its harms, I show structural biases within the medical and research establishments that curtail the reproductive autonomy of racialized, colonized people. Using an RJ analysis, I then discuss QS's parallels and connections to the ongoing U.S. eugenics projects and lessons that can be applied to current research practices.Finally, I conduct a scoping review of child welfare surveillance/over-surveillance and parenting among people with intellectual disabilities (ID), a group that is systematically denied the right to parent, especially among parents who are also racialized, LGBTQ+, impoverished and otherwise marginalized. Birth and parenting among people with cognitive disabilities remains under-researched. To my knowledge, this review is the first to apply reproductive justice principles to this population, despite the multiple systems of oppression and community and relational elements that make this area especially fruitful for reproductive justice-based inquiry.

English

ISBN: 9798346893844Subjects--Topical Terms:

543687
Disability studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Child welfare

The Right to Family: Reproductive and Disability Justice, Reproductive Health, Care and Coercion Among Structurally Marginalized Populations /
LDR:04863nmm a22004573i 4500 001 2429795
005 20250430094133.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2025 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798346893844
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31636842
035 $a AAI31636842
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Moring, Nechama F. Sammet, $e author. $3 3817823
245 1 0 $a The Right to Family: Reproductive and Disability Justice, Reproductive Health, Care and Coercion Among Structurally Marginalized Populations / $c Nechama F. Sammet Moring.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2025
300 $a 1 electronic resource (390 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: A.
500 $a Advisors: Perloff, Jennifer Committee members: Dunnigan, Robert; Brown, Melissa; Brown, Lydia X. Z.
502 $b Ph.D. $c Brandeis University, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management $d 2025.
520 $a The right to contraception and abortion is fundamental, and a focus of mainstream white feminist policy advocacy efforts. However, the right to create families on our own terms is a less often discussed, but equally important element of reproductive justice, given the U.S.'s long history of eugenics and forced sterilization targeting racialized, queer, trans, disabled and other structurally marginalized populations. Reproductive justice (RJ), an activist-scholar tradition developed by Black women and people of marginalized genders, focuses on the human right of all people to bodily autonomy, including reproductive autonomy; to have children, to not have children, to parent the children we have and to create family on our own terms, in safe and sustainable communities free from state violence, including the violence of poverty. RJ is under-utilized in the academy, though it offers an important, holistic and history-informed lens that considers the power relationships and systems of oppression that are institutionalized across all areas of U.S. life and policy. Like disability justice, a "sibling" activist-scholar tradition also developed by activists of color, RJ considers relationships and community as important units of analysis.This dissertation utilizes RJ frameworks to analyze three examples of reproductive in/justice. First, I use Medicare provider data to conduct a descriptive analysis of reproductive health procedure utilization among people with disabilities severe enough to qualify for Medicare before age 65. The reproductive health of this population is often ignored, despite the numerous health inequities noted among disabled populations in general. This analysis provides a "lay of the land" overview to inform future studies and efforts to reduce inequities and increase autonomy in this population.Next, I explore quinacrine sterilization (QS), and the relatively recent, flawed research that enabled it, conducted mostly by two charismatic American "population scientists" and their mentees. QS is an easy to perform but risky sterilization procedure that was used widely - and often coercively - across the imperialized Global South. By analyzing the biased research that justified and enabled QS, despite its harms, I show structural biases within the medical and research establishments that curtail the reproductive autonomy of racialized, colonized people. Using an RJ analysis, I then discuss QS's parallels and connections to the ongoing U.S. eugenics projects and lessons that can be applied to current research practices.Finally, I conduct a scoping review of child welfare surveillance/over-surveillance and parenting among people with intellectual disabilities (ID), a group that is systematically denied the right to parent, especially among parents who are also racialized, LGBTQ+, impoverished and otherwise marginalized. Birth and parenting among people with cognitive disabilities remains under-researched. To my knowledge, this review is the first to apply reproductive justice principles to this population, despite the multiple systems of oppression and community and relational elements that make this area especially fruitful for reproductive justice-based inquiry.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0541
650 4 $a Disability studies. $3 543687
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Science history. $3 2144850
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
653 $a Child welfare
653 $a Abolition
653 $a Disability justice
653 $a Health injustices
653 $a Quinacrine sterilization
653 $a Reproductive justice
690 $a 0201
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0585
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a Brandeis University, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management. $b The Heller School for Social Policy and Management. $e degree granting institution. $3 3817824
720 1 $a Perloff, Jennifer $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-07A.
790 $a 0541
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2025
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31636842