Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
Spatially Explicit Population Dynami...
~
White, Taylor,
Linked to FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Spatially Explicit Population Dynamics and Viability of Pinto Abalone Across Southeast Alaska /
Record Type:
Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
Spatially Explicit Population Dynamics and Viability of Pinto Abalone Across Southeast Alaska // Taylor White.
Author:
White, Taylor,
Description:
1 electronic resource (194 pages)
Notes:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International86-07B.
Subject:
Ecology. -
Online resource:
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31631961
ISBN:
9798302852007
Spatially Explicit Population Dynamics and Viability of Pinto Abalone Across Southeast Alaska /
White, Taylor,
Spatially Explicit Population Dynamics and Viability of Pinto Abalone Across Southeast Alaska /
Taylor White. - 1 electronic resource (194 pages)
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: B.
Pinto abalone (Haliotis kamtschatkana) populations in Alaska have faced numerous ecological pressures, including the extirpation of Northern sea otters (Enhydra lutris kenyoni) due to the international maritime fur trade, the establishment and later emergency closure of a commercial fishery, the repatriation of sea otters, and ongoing subsistence harvest. Abalone are significant to the region for both ecological and cultural reasons. However, data deficiencies hinder the proper understanding and management of the species across its northernmost range, as no comprehensive surveys of pinto abalone across Southeast Alaska exist. This body of work aims to 1) assess the lasting impacts of fisheries and sea otters on present-day population demographics, 2) explore variations in abalone populations and recruitment and factors promoting recruitment across Southeast Alaska, and 3) assess the indirect and direct effects of repatriating sea otters on abalone populations. In Chapter 1, we assessed the impacts of fisheries and sea otters on current (2016, 2019) population demographics through comparisons of recent resurveys with historical datasets in areas both with and without sea otters. Compared to historical surveys, locations with repatriated sea otters and historically intensive fishery landings had the most significant reductions in abundance and size frequencies. Yet, locations with moderate harvest and no established sea otter populations remained similar to historical surveys. Through a spatially nested design in Chapter 2, we determined the present-day (2018, 2019) population metrics important to management (i.e., abalone densities, recruitment, size structure) and calculated reproductive capacities (i.e., egg mass) and fertilization potential (i.e., aggregation metrics) across Southeast Alaska. We identified distinctly different abalone populations across sites and regions, including Sitka, Prince of Wales Island, and Dixon Entrance, all showing evidence of visible recruitment. We determined adult abalone critical densities of (0.2/m2) and nearest neighbor distances of (0.2m), beyond which there was a minimal increased benefit of fertilization potential. Finally, with established ecological patterns following sea otter re-establishment, modeled data, and local expertise on sea otters, along with dive surveys of urchins, algal cover, and abalone (see Chapter 3), we identified the indirect benefits of moderate sea otter influence. We found abalone persist with and may likely indirectly benefit from the presence of sea otter populations through their consumption of herbivore competitors like sea urchins, whereby locations where otters remained absent had higher urchin biomasses and lower abalone densities (i.e., Dixon Entrance) than locations with long-established sea otter populations (i.e., Sitka). These findings provide the most comprehensive review of pinto abalone populations throughout Southeast Alaska and suggest effective abalone management must consider complex indirect interactions with sea otters and direct impacts of human harvest at smaller localized scales.
English
ISBN: 9798302852007Subjects--Topical Terms:
516476
Ecology.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Alaska
Spatially Explicit Population Dynamics and Viability of Pinto Abalone Across Southeast Alaska /
LDR
:04584nmm a22004333i 4500
001
2429241
005
20250430093605.5
006
m o d
007
cr|nu||||||||
008
261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020
$a
9798302852007
035
$a
(MiAaPQD)AAI31631961
035
$a
AAI31631961
040
$a
MiAaPQD
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQD
$e
rda
100
1
$a
White, Taylor,
$e
author.
$0
(orcid)0009-0004-5070-4900
$3
3816972
245
1 0
$a
Spatially Explicit Population Dynamics and Viability of Pinto Abalone Across Southeast Alaska /
$c
Taylor White.
264
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2024
300
$a
1 electronic resource (194 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-07, Section: B.
500
$a
Advisors: White, Taylor Committee members: Raimondi, Peter; Kroeker, Kristy; Eckert, Ginny; Rogers-Bennett, Laura.
502
$b
Ph.D.
$c
University of California, Santa Cruz
$d
2024.
520
$a
Pinto abalone (Haliotis kamtschatkana) populations in Alaska have faced numerous ecological pressures, including the extirpation of Northern sea otters (Enhydra lutris kenyoni) due to the international maritime fur trade, the establishment and later emergency closure of a commercial fishery, the repatriation of sea otters, and ongoing subsistence harvest. Abalone are significant to the region for both ecological and cultural reasons. However, data deficiencies hinder the proper understanding and management of the species across its northernmost range, as no comprehensive surveys of pinto abalone across Southeast Alaska exist. This body of work aims to 1) assess the lasting impacts of fisheries and sea otters on present-day population demographics, 2) explore variations in abalone populations and recruitment and factors promoting recruitment across Southeast Alaska, and 3) assess the indirect and direct effects of repatriating sea otters on abalone populations. In Chapter 1, we assessed the impacts of fisheries and sea otters on current (2016, 2019) population demographics through comparisons of recent resurveys with historical datasets in areas both with and without sea otters. Compared to historical surveys, locations with repatriated sea otters and historically intensive fishery landings had the most significant reductions in abundance and size frequencies. Yet, locations with moderate harvest and no established sea otter populations remained similar to historical surveys. Through a spatially nested design in Chapter 2, we determined the present-day (2018, 2019) population metrics important to management (i.e., abalone densities, recruitment, size structure) and calculated reproductive capacities (i.e., egg mass) and fertilization potential (i.e., aggregation metrics) across Southeast Alaska. We identified distinctly different abalone populations across sites and regions, including Sitka, Prince of Wales Island, and Dixon Entrance, all showing evidence of visible recruitment. We determined adult abalone critical densities of (0.2/m2) and nearest neighbor distances of (0.2m), beyond which there was a minimal increased benefit of fertilization potential. Finally, with established ecological patterns following sea otter re-establishment, modeled data, and local expertise on sea otters, along with dive surveys of urchins, algal cover, and abalone (see Chapter 3), we identified the indirect benefits of moderate sea otter influence. We found abalone persist with and may likely indirectly benefit from the presence of sea otter populations through their consumption of herbivore competitors like sea urchins, whereby locations where otters remained absent had higher urchin biomasses and lower abalone densities (i.e., Dixon Entrance) than locations with long-established sea otter populations (i.e., Sitka). These findings provide the most comprehensive review of pinto abalone populations throughout Southeast Alaska and suggest effective abalone management must consider complex indirect interactions with sea otters and direct impacts of human harvest at smaller localized scales.
546
$a
English
590
$a
School code: 0036
650
4
$a
Ecology.
$3
516476
650
4
$a
Evolution & development.
$3
3172418
650
4
$a
Biological oceanography.
$3
2122748
653
$a
Alaska
653
$a
Pinto abalone
653
$a
Predator
653
$a
Sea otters
653
$a
Subsistence
690
$a
0329
690
$a
0412
690
$a
0416
710
2
$a
University of California, Santa Cruz.
$b
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology.
$e
degree granting institution.
$3
3816973
720
1
$a
White, Taylor
$e
degree supervisor.
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
86-07B.
790
$a
0036
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2024
856
4 0
$u
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31631961
based on 0 review(s)
Location:
ALL
電子資源
Year:
Volume Number:
Items
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Inventory Number
Location Name
Item Class
Material type
Call number
Usage Class
Loan Status
No. of reservations
Opac note
Attachments
W9524936
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
On shelf
0
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login