東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The Syntactic and Semantic Compariso...

Lu, Yi-Ting,

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Syntactic and Semantic Comparisons Between the Sentence Final Particles Le and De in Mandarin Chinese = = 漢語句尾助詞「了」與「的」的句法語意比較 /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The Syntactic and Semantic Comparisons Between the Sentence Final Particles Le and De in Mandarin Chinese =/ Yi-Ting Lu.
Reminder of title:	漢語句尾助詞「了」與「的」的句法語意比較 /
Author:	Lu, Yi-Ting,
Description:	1 electronic resource (82 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International86-05.
Subject:	Light. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31602361
ISBN:	9798383671818

The Syntactic and Semantic Comparisons Between the Sentence Final Particles Le and De in Mandarin Chinese = = 漢語句尾助詞「了」與「的」的句法語意比較 /
Lu, Yi-Ting,

The Syntactic and Semantic Comparisons Between the Sentence Final Particles Le and De in Mandarin Chinese =漢語句尾助詞「了」與「的」的句法語意比較 /Yi-Ting Lu. - 1 electronic resource (82 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-05.

This thesis aims to account for the interpretative differences between the sentence final particles (SFPs) le and de in Mandarin Chinese and provide an analysis that captures their syntactic properties. Along with Shen (2004)‟s analysis, which categorized le as a [+dynamic] particle, I propose that de is [-dynamic], which needs to agree with the closest predicate in dynamicity. This analysis suggests that all the predicates in Mandarin Chinese are [+dynamic] by default. As a result, I re-define the function of dynamic light verbs proposed in Shen (2004). I argue that dynamic light verbs do not need to serve the function of inchoativity; instead, they provide the extent change on common grounds. Semantically, le and de can both signify the change of common grounds, while de has more restrictions on privateness and accessibility of information, as proposed in Soh (2018).

English

ISBN: 9798383671818Subjects--Topical Terms:

524021
Light.
Subjects--Index Terms:

句尾助詞

The Syntactic and Semantic Comparisons Between the Sentence Final Particles Le and De in Mandarin Chinese = = 漢語句尾助詞「了」與「的」的句法語意比較 /
LDR:03239nmm a22004453i 4500 001 2428949
005 20250420214356.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2023 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798383671818
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31602361
035 $a AAI31602361
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Lu, Yi-Ting, $e author. $3 3816497
245 1 0 $a The Syntactic and Semantic Comparisons Between the Sentence Final Particles Le and De in Mandarin Chinese = $b 漢語句尾助詞「了」與「的」的句法語意比較 / $c Yi-Ting Lu.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 1 electronic resource (82 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-05.
500 $a Advisors: Liu, Chi-Ming.
502 $b M.A. $c National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University $d 2023.
520 $a This thesis aims to account for the interpretative differences between the sentence final particles (SFPs) le and de in Mandarin Chinese and provide an analysis that captures their syntactic properties. Along with Shen (2004)‟s analysis, which categorized le as a [+dynamic] particle, I propose that de is [-dynamic], which needs to agree with the closest predicate in dynamicity. This analysis suggests that all the predicates in Mandarin Chinese are [+dynamic] by default. As a result, I re-define the function of dynamic light verbs proposed in Shen (2004). I argue that dynamic light verbs do not need to serve the function of inchoativity; instead, they provide the extent change on common grounds. Semantically, le and de can both signify the change of common grounds, while de has more restrictions on privateness and accessibility of information, as proposed in Soh (2018).
520 $a 本研究旨在解釋漢語中句末助詞「了」和「的」之間的語意及句法差異。Shen (2004) 的分析提到，「了」帶有 [+dynamic] 的屬性，須與句子中最接近的謂詞一致; 我認為「的」則帶有 [-dynamic] 的屬性，也須與最接近的謂詞一致化。此分析也顯示，漢語中的所有謂詞都是預設 [+dynamic] 的屬性。此研究亦重新定義了 Shen (2004) 提出的動態輕動詞的功能，認為動態輕動詞的功能並非使謂詞語意含有啟動意義 (inchoativity)，而是讓加上程度副詞後形成 [-dynamic] 的謂語詞組可以在說話者與聽話者共同資訊基礎上做程度的變化。在語意上，「了」和「的」都可以表示說話者與聽話者共同資訊基礎的變化，而如 Soh (2018) 所提出的，此研究亦顯示「的」對訊息的隱私性和可取得性有更多限制。.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 2648
650 4 $a Light. $3 524021
650 4 $a Phonology. $3 891257
650 4 $a Chinese languages. $3 3560871
650 4 $a Semantics. $3 520060
650 4 $a Language. $3 643551
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
653 $a 句尾助詞
653 $a 動態性
653 $a 輕動詞
653 $a Sentence final particles
653 $a Dynamicity
653 $a Light verbs
690 $a 0679
690 $a 0290
710 2 $a National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University. $b Institute of Foreign Literatures and Linguistics. $e degree granting institution. $3 3816498
720 1 $a Liu, Chi-Ming $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 86-05.
790 $a 2648
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2023
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31602361