東華大學圖書館 |

Everyday Aquatic Food System Transformations in Myanmar /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Everyday Aquatic Food System Transformations in Myanmar // Xavier Tezzo.
作者:	Tezzo, Xavier,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (213 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-02B.
標題:	Social life & customs. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31206423
ISBN:	9798383709603

Everyday Aquatic Food System Transformations in Myanmar /
Tezzo, Xavier,

Everyday Aquatic Food System Transformations in Myanmar /Xavier Tezzo. - 1 electronic resource (213 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: B.

1.1. Beyond aquatic food productivismAquatic foods are important for nutrition, livelihoods and cuisines in many countries across Asia and Africa, yet they have historically been overlooked in food policy and research (Bene et al. 2015; Golden et al. 2021). However, in response to renewed political attention to food systems, including at the United Nations and the World Economic Forum (Tigchelaar et al. 2022; Crona et al. 2023), there is increasing recognition of the accessible and affordable contribution of aquatic foods to nutrition security in both high- and low-income countries (Bene et al. 2015; Bennett et al. 2021; Ryckman et al. 2021). There is also growing realization that this contribution is made possible by the inherent diversity of aquatic food systems - including land and seascapes that produce over 600 farmed species and 2,200 from wild caught animal and plant species (Naylor et al. 2021a; Crona et al. 2023), and a diversity of actors and activities associated with producing, transforming, distributing, and consuming aquatic foods (Short et al. 2021; Tigchelaar et al. 2022; Tlusty et al. 2019).Owing to a combination of factors - most notably population growth, rising incomes, and urbanization - demand for aquatic food has continued to increase over recent decades, leading to transformations in how it is produced, traded and consumed (HLPE 2014; FAO 2022). Current understandings of these transformations are dominated by a productivist perspective that focuses on the spectacular intensification and expansion of aquaculture - a phenomenon commonly referred to as the 'blue revolution' (Garlock et al. 2020). This productivist framing holds important policy implications as it influences the ways in which aquatic food systems are imagined, understood and ultimately governed. At the heart of this blue revolution rhetoric is the assertion that aquatic productivity must keep increasing in order to meet the ever-growing demand for these foods globally (see Pullin & Neal 1984; Bush 2008; Hishamunda et al. 2009). The conjunction of this narrative with wider neoliberal agendas of economic development and growth (see Sonnino et al. 2016) has consequently asserted that aquaculture is fundamental to food and nutrition security by making aquatic foods more abundant and cheaper (Short et al. 2021). Over time, aquatic productivism has been credited with even wider (yet poorly substantiated) merits (Bene et al. 2016). For instance, 'blue economy' narratives have driven perceptions that aquatic landscapes have an untapped potential for aquaculture expansion to deliver economic growth and improved livelihoods (Cisneros-montemayor et al. 2021). In addition, the blue revolution is assumed to deliver a range of opportunities for improving environmental performance (e.g. lower carbon footprints) of the (global) food systems to which they contribute (Crona et al. 2023; Willett et al. 2019).While having driven the expansion of aquaculture, aquatic productivism has also drawn attention away from multiple other factors that shape the role of aquatic foods, especially in regions such as Southeast Asia that are dependent on them for nutrition and livelihoods (Belton & Bush 2014; Bush & Marschke 2014; Belton et al. 2017). For instance, although production of aquatic food has been well documented in the region (Belton et al. 2018a; FAO 2022), relatively less attention has been given to their trade and consumption. At the same time, there is a growing body of research questioning some of the core benefits attributed to the blue revolution related to trade and consumption. Questions have also been raised over the nutritional quality of farmed fish compared to wild fish (see Little et al. 2010; Bogard et al. 2017) and the social equity of transforming common access water bodies and landscapes to (semi-) privatised aquaculture production systems (see Adduci 2009; Saguin 2016). Concerns on the environmental sustainability of aquaculture, such as reduced species diversity in waters surrounding aquaculture farms and impacts on ambient water quality, are also widely documented (see De Silva 2012; Edwards 2015). While these concerns hold consequences for consumption and trade, research and policy tends to address them all as production-related issues with production-related solutions.

English

ISBN: 9798383709603Subjects--Topical Terms:

3546011
Social life & customs.

Everyday Aquatic Food System Transformations in Myanmar /
LDR:05940nmm a22005413i 4500 001 2428211
005 20250414021637.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 261011s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798383709603
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31206423
035 $a (MiAaPQD)Wageningen626154
035 $a AAI31206423
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Tezzo, Xavier, $e author. $3 3815266
245 1 0 $a Everyday Aquatic Food System Transformations in Myanmar / $c Xavier Tezzo.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (213 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: B.
500 $a Advisors: Bush, Simon R.; Oosterveer, Peter; Belton, Ben.
502 $b Ph.D. $c Wageningen University and Research $d 2024.
520 $a 1.1. Beyond aquatic food productivismAquatic foods are important for nutrition, livelihoods and cuisines in many countries across Asia and Africa, yet they have historically been overlooked in food policy and research (Bene et al. 2015; Golden et al. 2021). However, in response to renewed political attention to food systems, including at the United Nations and the World Economic Forum (Tigchelaar et al. 2022; Crona et al. 2023), there is increasing recognition of the accessible and affordable contribution of aquatic foods to nutrition security in both high- and low-income countries (Bene et al. 2015; Bennett et al. 2021; Ryckman et al. 2021). There is also growing realization that this contribution is made possible by the inherent diversity of aquatic food systems - including land and seascapes that produce over 600 farmed species and 2,200 from wild caught animal and plant species (Naylor et al. 2021a; Crona et al. 2023), and a diversity of actors and activities associated with producing, transforming, distributing, and consuming aquatic foods (Short et al. 2021; Tigchelaar et al. 2022; Tlusty et al. 2019).Owing to a combination of factors - most notably population growth, rising incomes, and urbanization - demand for aquatic food has continued to increase over recent decades, leading to transformations in how it is produced, traded and consumed (HLPE 2014; FAO 2022). Current understandings of these transformations are dominated by a productivist perspective that focuses on the spectacular intensification and expansion of aquaculture - a phenomenon commonly referred to as the 'blue revolution' (Garlock et al. 2020). This productivist framing holds important policy implications as it influences the ways in which aquatic food systems are imagined, understood and ultimately governed. At the heart of this blue revolution rhetoric is the assertion that aquatic productivity must keep increasing in order to meet the ever-growing demand for these foods globally (see Pullin & Neal 1984; Bush 2008; Hishamunda et al. 2009). The conjunction of this narrative with wider neoliberal agendas of economic development and growth (see Sonnino et al. 2016) has consequently asserted that aquaculture is fundamental to food and nutrition security by making aquatic foods more abundant and cheaper (Short et al. 2021). Over time, aquatic productivism has been credited with even wider (yet poorly substantiated) merits (Bene et al. 2016). For instance, 'blue economy' narratives have driven perceptions that aquatic landscapes have an untapped potential for aquaculture expansion to deliver economic growth and improved livelihoods (Cisneros-montemayor et al. 2021). In addition, the blue revolution is assumed to deliver a range of opportunities for improving environmental performance (e.g. lower carbon footprints) of the (global) food systems to which they contribute (Crona et al. 2023; Willett et al. 2019).While having driven the expansion of aquaculture, aquatic productivism has also drawn attention away from multiple other factors that shape the role of aquatic foods, especially in regions such as Southeast Asia that are dependent on them for nutrition and livelihoods (Belton & Bush 2014; Bush & Marschke 2014; Belton et al. 2017). For instance, although production of aquatic food has been well documented in the region (Belton et al. 2018a; FAO 2022), relatively less attention has been given to their trade and consumption. At the same time, there is a growing body of research questioning some of the core benefits attributed to the blue revolution related to trade and consumption. Questions have also been raised over the nutritional quality of farmed fish compared to wild fish (see Little et al. 2010; Bogard et al. 2017) and the social equity of transforming common access water bodies and landscapes to (semi-) privatised aquaculture production systems (see Adduci 2009; Saguin 2016). Concerns on the environmental sustainability of aquaculture, such as reduced species diversity in waters surrounding aquaculture farms and impacts on ambient water quality, are also widely documented (see De Silva 2012; Edwards 2015). While these concerns hold consequences for consumption and trade, research and policy tends to address them all as production-related issues with production-related solutions.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 2157
650 4 $a Social life & customs. $3 3546011
650 4 $a Debates. $3 3564086
650 4 $a Biodiversity. $3 627066
650 4 $a Nutrition. $3 517777
650 4 $a Social change. $3 526824
650 4 $a Land degradation. $3 2054631
650 4 $a System theory. $3 525574
650 4 $a Innovations. $3 754112
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 516174
650 4 $a Urbanization. $3 535373
650 4 $a Fish. $3 3564374
650 4 $a Aquatic sciences. $3 3174300
650 4 $a Biological oceanography. $3 2122748
650 4 $a Conservation biology. $3 535736
650 4 $a Cultural anthropology. $3 2122764
650 4 $a Land use planning. $3 2122760
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Southeast Asian studies. $3 3344898
650 4 $a Sustainability. $3 1029978
650 4 $a Systems science. $3 3168411
650 4 $a Urban planning. $3 2122922
690 $a 0570
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0626
690 $a 0792
690 $a 0416
690 $a 0408
690 $a 0326
690 $a 0501
690 $a 0536
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0222
690 $a 0640
690 $a 0790
690 $a 0999
710 2 $a Wageningen University and Research. $e degree granting institution. $3 3815267
720 1 $a Bush, Simon R. $e degree supervisor.
720 1 $a Oosterveer, Peter $e degree supervisor.
720 1 $a Belton, Ben $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-02B.
790 $a 2157
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31206423