東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Law as a science

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Law as a science/ by Shai Dothan.
作者:	Dothan, Shai.
出版者:	Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland : : 2025.,
面頁冊數:	xiv, 170 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
內容註:	1. Introduction -- Part A Methodology for Legal Research -- 2. The Importance of Making Assumptions -- 3. A Reduction of the Law to Its Components -- 4. The Right Way to Use Reasoning by Analogy -- Part B Legal Principles and Their Limits -- 5. Proportionality -- 6. Consistency -- 7. Truth -- Part C Observing the Law -- 8. What Law Looks Like -- 9. Conclusion.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Legal research. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-01316-3
ISBN:	9783032013163

Law as a science
Dothan, Shai.

Law as a science[electronic resource] /by Shai Dothan. - Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :2025. - xiv, 170 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

1. Introduction -- Part A Methodology for Legal Research -- 2. The Importance of Making Assumptions -- 3. A Reduction of the Law to Its Components -- 4. The Right Way to Use Reasoning by Analogy -- Part B Legal Principles and Their Limits -- 5. Proportionality -- 6. Consistency -- 7. Truth -- Part C Observing the Law -- 8. What Law Looks Like -- 9. Conclusion.

The purpose of this book is to investigate what methods of interpretation and understanding of the law are useful for legal scholarship. The main idea is that legal scholarship needs to regularly make assumptions about the content of the law and about human behavior to better understand legal doctrine. For example, law and economics scholars often assume that people are rational or that the law aspires to efficiency. These assumptions may be untrue, but they can lead to hypotheses about the content of the law that are susceptible to empirical investigation against relevant legal sources. In contrast, conceptual thinking about the essence of the law does not make claims that can be falsified by observing legal sources. The book offers a methodology for examining the state of the law on a specific topic that aspires to be rigorous. It recommends first establishing what are the conflicting paradigms that explain the relevant legal field. These paradigms can serve as assumptions and scholars need to build a hypothesis that complies with all the relevant assumptions. The hypothesis can then be checked against legal sources. If there are relevant judgments on a similar topic, scholars can use reasoning by analogy to test the hypothesis against them, but only if the analogy is grounded in policy reasons. Analogies cannot be used only because legal solutions look conceptually similar. If a hypothesis about the law is confirmed by legal sources, it can be adopted as the best interpretation of the law on a particular point. To demonstrate that every assumption about the law can be contested, the book reviews three basic legal principles: proportionality, consistency, and legal truth. It suggests that such principles are useful assumptions that can lead to good predictions about the content of the law most of the time, but in certain situations, they should be discarded and replaced by other assumptions.

ISBN: 9783032013163

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-032-01316-3doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

824312
Legal research.

LC Class. No.: K85

Dewey Class. No.: 340.072

Law as a science
LDR:03205nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 2412916
003 DE-He213
005 20250827124655.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 260204s2025 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783032013163 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783032013156 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-032-01316-3 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-032-01316-3
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a K85
072 7 $a LAB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW000000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LAB $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 340.072 $2 23
090 $a K85 $b .D725 2025
100 1 $a Dothan, Shai. $3 3504188
245 1 0 $a Law as a science $h [electronic resource] / $c by Shai Dothan.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer Nature Switzerland : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2025.
300 $a xiv, 170 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a 1. Introduction -- Part A Methodology for Legal Research -- 2. The Importance of Making Assumptions -- 3. A Reduction of the Law to Its Components -- 4. The Right Way to Use Reasoning by Analogy -- Part B Legal Principles and Their Limits -- 5. Proportionality -- 6. Consistency -- 7. Truth -- Part C Observing the Law -- 8. What Law Looks Like -- 9. Conclusion.
520 $a The purpose of this book is to investigate what methods of interpretation and understanding of the law are useful for legal scholarship. The main idea is that legal scholarship needs to regularly make assumptions about the content of the law and about human behavior to better understand legal doctrine. For example, law and economics scholars often assume that people are rational or that the law aspires to efficiency. These assumptions may be untrue, but they can lead to hypotheses about the content of the law that are susceptible to empirical investigation against relevant legal sources. In contrast, conceptual thinking about the essence of the law does not make claims that can be falsified by observing legal sources. The book offers a methodology for examining the state of the law on a specific topic that aspires to be rigorous. It recommends first establishing what are the conflicting paradigms that explain the relevant legal field. These paradigms can serve as assumptions and scholars need to build a hypothesis that complies with all the relevant assumptions. The hypothesis can then be checked against legal sources. If there are relevant judgments on a similar topic, scholars can use reasoning by analogy to test the hypothesis against them, but only if the analogy is grounded in policy reasons. Analogies cannot be used only because legal solutions look conceptually similar. If a hypothesis about the law is confirmed by legal sources, it can be adopted as the best interpretation of the law on a particular point. To demonstrate that every assumption about the law can be contested, the book reviews three basic legal principles: proportionality, consistency, and legal truth. It suggests that such principles are useful assumptions that can lead to good predictions about the content of the law most of the time, but in certain situations, they should be discarded and replaced by other assumptions.
650 0 $a Legal research. $3 824312
650 1 4 $a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. $3 1565627
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-01316-3
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)