東華大學圖書館 |

Collective dimensions of access to justice = a constitutional study on Italian class actions in the European multilevel system /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Collective dimensions of access to justice/ by Ander Maglica.
Reminder of title:	a constitutional study on Italian class actions in the European multilevel system /
Author:	Maglica, Ander.
Published:	Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland : : 2025.,
Description:	xii, 329 p. :ill. (some col.), digital ;24 cm.
[NT 15003449]:	Premise -- Part 1: Contextual Foundations. Winds of Change -- The Effects of Globalisation and New Technologies on the Social Fabric -- A Multilevel Constitutional Context -- Constitutional Foundations of (Collective) Access to Justice in Italy and Concepts -- Part 2: Collective Actions. Route of Change -- Class Actions: Origins, Us Development and Current EU Context -- The 2019 Italian Class Action Reform in an Integrating Constitutional Perspective -- Part 3: Collective Enforcement. Exercises of Change -- Case Study No. 1: Environmental 'Sacrifice-Zone' and Harmful Medical Devices. The Ilva And Philips Respironics Cases -- Case Study No. 2: Food-Delivery Riders and Fair Working Conditions. The Deliveroo and Uber Eats Cases -- Case Study No. 3: Systemic Inhuman and Degrading Treatment of Prisoners and Migrants. Room for Future (Class) Actions? -- Case Study No. 4: Arbitration Clauses, Class Waivers and Foreign Defendants. The Binance Case -- Part 4: Conclusive Assessment -- Final Constitutional Assessment and Forward Look.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Class actions (Civil procedure) - Italy. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-94522-9
ISBN:	9783031945229

Collective dimensions of access to justice = a constitutional study on Italian class actions in the European multilevel system /
Maglica, Ander.

Collective dimensions of access to justicea constitutional study on Italian class actions in the European multilevel system /[electronic resource] :by Ander Maglica. - Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :2025. - xii, 329 p. :ill. (some col.), digital ;24 cm. - European Union and its neighbours in a globalized world,v. 232524-8936 ;. - European Union and its neighbours in a globalized world ;v. 23..

Premise -- Part 1: Contextual Foundations. Winds of Change -- The Effects of Globalisation and New Technologies on the Social Fabric -- A Multilevel Constitutional Context -- Constitutional Foundations of (Collective) Access to Justice in Italy and Concepts -- Part 2: Collective Actions. Route of Change -- Class Actions: Origins, Us Development and Current EU Context -- The 2019 Italian Class Action Reform in an Integrating Constitutional Perspective -- Part 3: Collective Enforcement. Exercises of Change -- Case Study No. 1: Environmental 'Sacrifice-Zone' and Harmful Medical Devices. The Ilva And Philips Respironics Cases -- Case Study No. 2: Food-Delivery Riders and Fair Working Conditions. The Deliveroo and Uber Eats Cases -- Case Study No. 3: Systemic Inhuman and Degrading Treatment of Prisoners and Migrants. Room for Future (Class) Actions? -- Case Study No. 4: Arbitration Clauses, Class Waivers and Foreign Defendants. The Binance Case -- Part 4: Conclusive Assessment -- Final Constitutional Assessment and Forward Look.

The current societal transformations, brought by globalization and technological innovation, have disrupted the global and multilevel constitutional landscape, now fragmented in standardized and massified relationships in which inequalities are increasingly amplified. Against such a backdrop, the democratic mechanisms of representation, on the one hand, and the traditional civil law dualistic paths of litigation, on the other hand, appear ineffective in enforcing rights, especially fundamental ones. The present research, theoretical and empirical, aims to evaluate the role of Italian class actions (also referred to, in the European context, as collective or representative actions) as a means of overcoming such challenges and ensuring effective access to justice. Adopting an innovative constitutional-law standpoint, it stems from the recent EU Directive 2020/1828 on representative actions for the protection of the collective interests of consumers, as well as the related national reforms, some of which - like the Italian one - are innovatively trans-substantive. From this, the book analyses, in a broader comparative lens, the constitutional foundations of collective enforcement (as opposed to individual litigation), the specific use of collective proceedings to enforce fundamental rights (rather than mere consumer ones - hence, the originality in the current scholarship context) and the potential drawbacks in light of possible abuse and fair trial guarantees. The topicality of the study is given by the currently developing case law on the matter in all EU Member States, especially in Italy, as well as by the numerous discussions on how to best implement such a tool in a strategic litigation perspective, while upholding essential due process guarantees. The analysis is interdisciplinary, as initially it draws from sociological and socio-legal insights, subsequently theoretically developed and assessed through the aid of case studies. It is also comparative, towards other jurisdictions' implementation of class actions and towards other more traditional European paths of fundamental rights' enforcement (e.g. constitutional review and ECtHR applications). The foundational lens, nonetheless, is a constitutional and legal one, since, on the one hand, it does so against the backdrop of the principles of fair trial and effective protection, enshrined under Articles 2, 24 and 111 It. Const., 6 and 13 ECHR, 47 CFREU, and 2 and 19 TEU, as developed by national and supranational Apex courts.

ISBN: 9783031945229

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-94522-9doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

3788609
Class actions (Civil procedure)
--Italy.

LC Class. No.: KKH1763.5

Dewey Class. No.: 347.45053

Collective dimensions of access to justice = a constitutional study on Italian class actions in the European multilevel system /
LDR:04709nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 2412910
003 DE-He213
005 20250822130219.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 260204s2025 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031945229 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031945212 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-94522-9 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-94522-9
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a KKH1763.5
072 7 $a LB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LB $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 347.45053 $2 23
090 $a KKH1763.5 $b .M195 2025
100 1 $a Maglica, Ander. $3 3788607
245 1 0 $a Collective dimensions of access to justice $h [electronic resource] : $b a constitutional study on Italian class actions in the European multilevel system / $c by Ander Maglica.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer Nature Switzerland : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2025.
300 $a xii, 329 p. : $b ill. (some col.), digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a European Union and its neighbours in a globalized world, $x 2524-8936 ; $v v. 23
505 0 $a Premise -- Part 1: Contextual Foundations. Winds of Change -- The Effects of Globalisation and New Technologies on the Social Fabric -- A Multilevel Constitutional Context -- Constitutional Foundations of (Collective) Access to Justice in Italy and Concepts -- Part 2: Collective Actions. Route of Change -- Class Actions: Origins, Us Development and Current EU Context -- The 2019 Italian Class Action Reform in an Integrating Constitutional Perspective -- Part 3: Collective Enforcement. Exercises of Change -- Case Study No. 1: Environmental 'Sacrifice-Zone' and Harmful Medical Devices. The Ilva And Philips Respironics Cases -- Case Study No. 2: Food-Delivery Riders and Fair Working Conditions. The Deliveroo and Uber Eats Cases -- Case Study No. 3: Systemic Inhuman and Degrading Treatment of Prisoners and Migrants. Room for Future (Class) Actions? -- Case Study No. 4: Arbitration Clauses, Class Waivers and Foreign Defendants. The Binance Case -- Part 4: Conclusive Assessment -- Final Constitutional Assessment and Forward Look.
520 $a The current societal transformations, brought by globalization and technological innovation, have disrupted the global and multilevel constitutional landscape, now fragmented in standardized and massified relationships in which inequalities are increasingly amplified. Against such a backdrop, the democratic mechanisms of representation, on the one hand, and the traditional civil law dualistic paths of litigation, on the other hand, appear ineffective in enforcing rights, especially fundamental ones. The present research, theoretical and empirical, aims to evaluate the role of Italian class actions (also referred to, in the European context, as collective or representative actions) as a means of overcoming such challenges and ensuring effective access to justice. Adopting an innovative constitutional-law standpoint, it stems from the recent EU Directive 2020/1828 on representative actions for the protection of the collective interests of consumers, as well as the related national reforms, some of which - like the Italian one - are innovatively trans-substantive. From this, the book analyses, in a broader comparative lens, the constitutional foundations of collective enforcement (as opposed to individual litigation), the specific use of collective proceedings to enforce fundamental rights (rather than mere consumer ones - hence, the originality in the current scholarship context) and the potential drawbacks in light of possible abuse and fair trial guarantees. The topicality of the study is given by the currently developing case law on the matter in all EU Member States, especially in Italy, as well as by the numerous discussions on how to best implement such a tool in a strategic litigation perspective, while upholding essential due process guarantees. The analysis is interdisciplinary, as initially it draws from sociological and socio-legal insights, subsequently theoretically developed and assessed through the aid of case studies. It is also comparative, towards other jurisdictions' implementation of class actions and towards other more traditional European paths of fundamental rights' enforcement (e.g. constitutional review and ECtHR applications). The foundational lens, nonetheless, is a constitutional and legal one, since, on the one hand, it does so against the backdrop of the principles of fair trial and effective protection, enshrined under Articles 2, 24 and 111 It. Const., 6 and 13 ECHR, 47 CFREU, and 2 and 19 TEU, as developed by national and supranational Apex courts.
650 0 $a Class actions (Civil procedure) $z Italy. $3 3788609
650 0 $a Class actions (Civil procedure) $z European Union countries. $3 3250816
650 0 $a Constitutional law $z Italy. $3 3788610
650 0 $a Constitutional law $z European Union countries. $3 719462
650 0 $a Justice, Administration of $z Italy. $3 3788611
650 1 4 $a European Law. $3 1566626
650 2 4 $a European Fundamental Rights and Freedoms. $3 3414356
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a European Union and its neighbours in a globalized world ; $v v. 23. $3 3788608
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-94522-9
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)