東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The right to see with technology = recording, augmented perception, and the Constitution /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The right to see with technology/ by Marc Jonathan Blitz.
其他題名:	recording, augmented perception, and the Constitution /
作者:	Blitz, Marc Jonathan.
出版者:	Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland : : 2025.,
面頁冊數:	vi, 185 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
內容註:	Chapter 1. The Constitution, Enhanced Perception, And Freedom Of Speech And Thought -- Chapter 2. The First Amendment Right To Record And Seeing As "Speech Creation" -- Chapter 3. Freedom Of Thought And Revisiting The Right To Receive Information (With Technology) -- Chapter 4. The Right To Natural And Extended Vision (And Bodily And Mental Integrity) -- Chapter 5: Cognitive Liberty, Privacy, And Extended Perception.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Conflict of laws - Privacy, Right of - United States. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-89533-3
ISBN:	9783031895333

The right to see with technology = recording, augmented perception, and the Constitution /
Blitz, Marc Jonathan.

The right to see with technologyrecording, augmented perception, and the Constitution /[electronic resource] :by Marc Jonathan Blitz. - Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :2025. - vi, 185 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Palgrave studies in law, neuroscience, and human behavior,2946-5206. - Palgrave studies in law, neuroscience, and human behavior..

Chapter 1. The Constitution, Enhanced Perception, And Freedom Of Speech And Thought -- Chapter 2. The First Amendment Right To Record And Seeing As "Speech Creation" -- Chapter 3. Freedom Of Thought And Revisiting The Right To Receive Information (With Technology) -- Chapter 4. The Right To Natural And Extended Vision (And Bodily And Mental Integrity) -- Chapter 5: Cognitive Liberty, Privacy, And Extended Perception.

This book asks if we have a constitutional right to see or sense our surroundings with technology. Do we have a constitutional right to record our surroundings with cameras embedded in smartphones or drones? Or to enhance our vision with extended reality technology, bionic eyes, or brain-computer interfaces? Courts in the United States have already provided a possible foundation for answering such questions. There is, they have said, a right to document matters of public concern by creating and sharing recordings with others. Such recordings extend our perception: They let us watch events that are remote in space and time. Yet sharing them is also a kind of communication and thus, the creation of "speech" protected by the First Amendment. So too might be other ways of seeing with technology. This emerging case law raises interesting questions and challenges, such as how enhancement of our perceptions can leave room for others' privacy. This book explores such questions, focusing on American constitutional jurisprudence. It also argues that, in doing so, it is helpful to recognize that our interest in using and enhancing our perceptual power isn't only an interest in doing so as part of First Amendment communication. It is also linked closely to other rights - to personal integrity and the liberty to use our body's perceptual powers and to the constitution's protection for freedom of thought or what some scholars call "cognitive liberty:" Our exercise of perception and our use of it to learn about our surroundings is a crucial part of exercising our and shaping our mind. Marc Jonathan Blitz is Alan Joseph Bennett Professor of Law at Oklahoma City University, USA. His scholarship focuses on how new technologies related to surveillance, extended reality, and neuroscience raise questions about privacy and freedom of thought and speech.

ISBN: 9783031895333

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-89533-3doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

3788255
Conflict of laws
--Privacy, Right of--United States.

LC Class. No.: KF1262

Dewey Class. No.: 344.095

The right to see with technology = recording, augmented perception, and the Constitution /
LDR:03386nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 2412697
003 DE-He213
005 20250806165118.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 260204s2025 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031895333 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031895326 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-89533-3 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-89533-3
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a KF1262
072 7 $a JMM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PSY020000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JMM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 344.095 $2 23
090 $a KF1262 $b .B649 2025
100 1 $a Blitz, Marc Jonathan. $3 3226321
245 1 4 $a The right to see with technology $h [electronic resource] : $b recording, augmented perception, and the Constitution / $c by Marc Jonathan Blitz.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer Nature Switzerland : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2025.
300 $a vi, 185 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Palgrave studies in law, neuroscience, and human behavior, $x 2946-5206
505 0 $a Chapter 1. The Constitution, Enhanced Perception, And Freedom Of Speech And Thought -- Chapter 2. The First Amendment Right To Record And Seeing As "Speech Creation" -- Chapter 3. Freedom Of Thought And Revisiting The Right To Receive Information (With Technology) -- Chapter 4. The Right To Natural And Extended Vision (And Bodily And Mental Integrity) -- Chapter 5: Cognitive Liberty, Privacy, And Extended Perception.
520 $a This book asks if we have a constitutional right to see or sense our surroundings with technology. Do we have a constitutional right to record our surroundings with cameras embedded in smartphones or drones? Or to enhance our vision with extended reality technology, bionic eyes, or brain-computer interfaces? Courts in the United States have already provided a possible foundation for answering such questions. There is, they have said, a right to document matters of public concern by creating and sharing recordings with others. Such recordings extend our perception: They let us watch events that are remote in space and time. Yet sharing them is also a kind of communication and thus, the creation of "speech" protected by the First Amendment. So too might be other ways of seeing with technology. This emerging case law raises interesting questions and challenges, such as how enhancement of our perceptions can leave room for others' privacy. This book explores such questions, focusing on American constitutional jurisprudence. It also argues that, in doing so, it is helpful to recognize that our interest in using and enhancing our perceptual power isn't only an interest in doing so as part of First Amendment communication. It is also linked closely to other rights - to personal integrity and the liberty to use our body's perceptual powers and to the constitution's protection for freedom of thought or what some scholars call "cognitive liberty:" Our exercise of perception and our use of it to learn about our surroundings is a crucial part of exercising our and shaping our mind. Marc Jonathan Blitz is Alan Joseph Bennett Professor of Law at Oklahoma City University, USA. His scholarship focuses on how new technologies related to surveillance, extended reality, and neuroscience raise questions about privacy and freedom of thought and speech.
650 0 $a Conflict of laws $x Privacy, Right of $z United States. $3 3788255
650 0 $a People with visual disabilities $x Legal status, laws, etc. $z United States. $3 3788256
650 0 $a Privacy, Right of $z United States. $3 572012
650 0 $a Right to health $z United States. $3 3788257
650 0 $a Technology and law $z United States. $3 2050123
650 0 $a Video recordings for people with visual disabilities. $3 1242297
650 1 4 $a Neuropsychology. $3 525119
650 2 4 $a Neuroscience. $3 917253
650 2 4 $a Forensic Psychology. $3 3596545
650 2 4 $a Cognitive Psychology. $3 891220
650 2 4 $a Socio-Legal Studies. $3 3593243
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Palgrave studies in law, neuroscience, and human behavior. $3 3226322
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-89533-3
950 $a Behavioral Science and Psychology (SpringerNature-41168)