東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Adequate connections = assessing arg...

Freeman, James B.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Adequate connections = assessing argument ground adequacy /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Adequate connections/ by James B. Freeman.
Reminder of title:	assessing argument ground adequacy /
Author:	Freeman, James B.
Published:	Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland : : 2025.,
Description:	xiii, 179 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
[NT 15003449]:	Connection Adequacy and the Concept of Warrant -- Identifying the Warrant of an Argument -- What Types of Warrants Are There? -- Conclusive A Priori Warrants -- Defeasible Warrants and Probability -- Defeasible A Posteriori Warrants I: Empirical Warrants -- Defeasible A Posteriori Warrants II: Personal Warrants -- Defeasible A Posteriori Warrants III: Institutional Warrants -- Defeasible A Priori Warrants -- Virtually Conclusive A Posteriori Warrants -- Determining Whether a Particular Connection is Adequate.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Reasoning. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76477-6
ISBN:	9783031764776

Adequate connections = assessing argument ground adequacy /
Freeman, James B.

Adequate connectionsassessing argument ground adequacy /[electronic resource] :by James B. Freeman. - Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :2025. - xiii, 179 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Argumentation library,v. 382215-1907 ;. - Argumentation library ;v. 38..

Connection Adequacy and the Concept of Warrant -- Identifying the Warrant of an Argument -- What Types of Warrants Are There? -- Conclusive A Priori Warrants -- Defeasible Warrants and Probability -- Defeasible A Posteriori Warrants I: Empirical Warrants -- Defeasible A Posteriori Warrants II: Personal Warrants -- Defeasible A Posteriori Warrants III: Institutional Warrants -- Defeasible A Priori Warrants -- Virtually Conclusive A Posteriori Warrants -- Determining Whether a Particular Connection is Adequate.

This book presents a comprehensive picture of when the premises of an argument are adequately connected to its conclusion. The author draws upon the familiar Toulmin model, Rescher's discussion of presumption and burden of proof, and L. Jonathan Cohen's presentation of the method of relevant variables. The book first assesses the warrant or inference rule connecting the premises to the conclusion. To analyzes this, the author asks a series of questions such as - should the warrant be evaluated by conclusive or defeasible standards? Does the argument require that its premises, if acceptable, guarantee that the conclusion is acceptable also or does it allow the premises just to present a body of relevant evidence? Is the inference rule backed or supported a priori or a posteriori? These distinctions form four categories of warrants: conclusive a priori, defeasible a posteriori, defeasible a priori, and virtually conclusive a posteriori. The warrants in each category are evaluated differently for how strongly the premises support the conclusion of arguments instancing those warrants. After presenting the rationale for this division and discussing our nonprobabilistic approach, the author analyzes the connection adequacy for each of these types of warrants. This book is of interest to scholars of argumentation theory.

ISBN: 9783031764776

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-76477-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

519507
Reasoning.

LC Class. No.: BC177

Dewey Class. No.: 168

Adequate connections = assessing argument ground adequacy /
LDR:02878nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 2411238
003 DE-He213
005 20250326115252.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 260204s2025 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031764776 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031764769 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-76477-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-76477-6
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a BC177
072 7 $a HPL $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI011000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDTL $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 168 $2 23
090 $a BC177 $b .F855 2025
100 1 $a Freeman, James B. $3 3095006
245 1 0 $a Adequate connections $h [electronic resource] : $b assessing argument ground adequacy / $c by James B. Freeman.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer Nature Switzerland : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2025.
300 $a xiii, 179 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Argumentation library, $x 2215-1907 ; $v v. 38
505 0 $a Connection Adequacy and the Concept of Warrant -- Identifying the Warrant of an Argument -- What Types of Warrants Are There? -- Conclusive A Priori Warrants -- Defeasible Warrants and Probability -- Defeasible A Posteriori Warrants I: Empirical Warrants -- Defeasible A Posteriori Warrants II: Personal Warrants -- Defeasible A Posteriori Warrants III: Institutional Warrants -- Defeasible A Priori Warrants -- Virtually Conclusive A Posteriori Warrants -- Determining Whether a Particular Connection is Adequate.
520 $a This book presents a comprehensive picture of when the premises of an argument are adequately connected to its conclusion. The author draws upon the familiar Toulmin model, Rescher's discussion of presumption and burden of proof, and L. Jonathan Cohen's presentation of the method of relevant variables. The book first assesses the warrant or inference rule connecting the premises to the conclusion. To analyzes this, the author asks a series of questions such as - should the warrant be evaluated by conclusive or defeasible standards? Does the argument require that its premises, if acceptable, guarantee that the conclusion is acceptable also or does it allow the premises just to present a body of relevant evidence? Is the inference rule backed or supported a priori or a posteriori? These distinctions form four categories of warrants: conclusive a priori, defeasible a posteriori, defeasible a priori, and virtually conclusive a posteriori. The warrants in each category are evaluated differently for how strongly the premises support the conclusion of arguments instancing those warrants. After presenting the rationale for this division and discussing our nonprobabilistic approach, the author analyzes the connection adequacy for each of these types of warrants. This book is of interest to scholars of argumentation theory.
650 0 $a Reasoning. $3 519507
650 0 $a Logic. $3 529544
650 1 4 $a Philosophical Logic. $3 3538770
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Argumentation library ; $v v. 38. $3 3785637
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76477-6
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)