東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

International College Students' Perc...

Mosoti, Asenath Kemuma.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

International College Students' Perceptions of Using ChatGPT in Producing Academic Essays.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	International College Students' Perceptions of Using ChatGPT in Producing Academic Essays./
Author:	Mosoti, Asenath Kemuma.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
Description:	68 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International86-03.
Subject:	Technology education. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31604075
ISBN:	9798383679333

International College Students' Perceptions of Using ChatGPT in Producing Academic Essays.
Mosoti, Asenath Kemuma.

International College Students' Perceptions of Using ChatGPT in Producing Academic Essays. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 68 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03.

Thesis (M.A.)--Youngstown State University, 2024.

The rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) technologies accessible to everyday users has attracted significant attention, including in education. For instance, ChatGPT attracted over 1 million users in less than a week after its release, marking one of the fastest-growing forms of AI. These technologies have the potential to transform the products and processes of writing, especially those of L2 writers who face challenges with composing. However, scholars and instructors have raised concerns about the potential ethical issues surrounding their use, especially in cases of accusations of cheating or plagiarism. At the same time, less is known about the perspectives of students, including international and L2 students, who have the most to lose in instances of accusations of lack of academic integrity or plagiarism.To respond to this gap, my study uses sociocultural theory to examine multilingual university students' perceptions of ChatGPT as a scaffold for writing academic essays. Participants were 11 international students enrolled in a developmental composition course for undergraduate L2 writers at a mid-sized U.S. university in the Midwest. Data collection included a classroom intervention utilizing ChatGPT, a pre-intervention questionnaire, a post-intervention questionnaire, and semi-structured interviews. Overall, findings include that these students' perceptions are divided, and individual students may be torn about how useful ChatGPT is. Specifically, in various areas, students rated ChatGPT as less helpful than what other scholars have found (e.g., word-, sentence- and some discourse-level scaffolds; Sumakul, 2023). Additionally, students' perceptions of using ChatGPT as a scaffold were not as positive as getting feedback on their writing from a peer. However, students also became less concerned about the accuracy and trustworthiness of ChatGPT after being exposed to it. Theoretical and pedagogical implications are discussed.

ISBN: 9798383679333Subjects--Topical Terms:

3423978
Technology education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Artificial intelligence in writing

International College Students' Perceptions of Using ChatGPT in Producing Academic Essays.
LDR:03106nmm a2200373 4500 001 2404686
005 20241216064802.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798383679333
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31604075
035 $a AAI31604075
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Mosoti, Asenath Kemuma. $3 3775007
245 1 0 $a International College Students' Perceptions of Using ChatGPT in Producing Academic Essays.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 68 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03.
500 $a Advisor: Pettitt, Nicole.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Youngstown State University, 2024.
520 $a The rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) technologies accessible to everyday users has attracted significant attention, including in education. For instance, ChatGPT attracted over 1 million users in less than a week after its release, marking one of the fastest-growing forms of AI. These technologies have the potential to transform the products and processes of writing, especially those of L2 writers who face challenges with composing. However, scholars and instructors have raised concerns about the potential ethical issues surrounding their use, especially in cases of accusations of cheating or plagiarism. At the same time, less is known about the perspectives of students, including international and L2 students, who have the most to lose in instances of accusations of lack of academic integrity or plagiarism.To respond to this gap, my study uses sociocultural theory to examine multilingual university students' perceptions of ChatGPT as a scaffold for writing academic essays. Participants were 11 international students enrolled in a developmental composition course for undergraduate L2 writers at a mid-sized U.S. university in the Midwest. Data collection included a classroom intervention utilizing ChatGPT, a pre-intervention questionnaire, a post-intervention questionnaire, and semi-structured interviews. Overall, findings include that these students' perceptions are divided, and individual students may be torn about how useful ChatGPT is. Specifically, in various areas, students rated ChatGPT as less helpful than what other scholars have found (e.g., word-, sentence- and some discourse-level scaffolds; Sumakul, 2023). Additionally, students' perceptions of using ChatGPT as a scaffold were not as positive as getting feedback on their writing from a peer. However, students also became less concerned about the accuracy and trustworthiness of ChatGPT after being exposed to it. Theoretical and pedagogical implications are discussed.
590 $a School code: 1238.
650 4 $a Technology education. $3 3423978
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a English as a second language. $3 516208
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
653 $a Artificial intelligence in writing
653 $a Second language writing
653 $a Technology in education
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0441
690 $a 0800
710 2 $a Youngstown State University. $b Department of Languages. $3 3775008
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 86-03.
790 $a 1238
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31604075