東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Mathematics of Facial Recognitio...

Delaney, Victoria Leah.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Mathematics of Facial Recognition: Statistics Teachers' Adaptations to a Machine Learning Curriculum.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Mathematics of Facial Recognition: Statistics Teachers' Adaptations to a Machine Learning Curriculum./
作者:	Delaney, Victoria Leah.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
面頁冊數:	440 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-04, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-04B.
標題:	Pedagogy. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31591776
ISBN:	9798342137614

The Mathematics of Facial Recognition: Statistics Teachers' Adaptations to a Machine Learning Curriculum.
Delaney, Victoria Leah.

The Mathematics of Facial Recognition: Statistics Teachers' Adaptations to a Machine Learning Curriculum. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 440 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-04, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2024.

Today's students are surrounded by machine learning (ML)-powered tools. Yet, few understand how they work. While there are numerous opportunities for students to learn about ML in informal settings (e.g., Alvarez et al., 2022; Druga et al., 2022) and online (e.g., code.org, Scratch), there are far fewer opportunities in the United States for students to learn about how ML works while they are in school. Although curriculum and standards frameworks have been developed to help educators navigate machine learning education, it is not yet known if teachers can or want to enact ML curriculum in their practice.As a former classroom teacher and ML graduate student, I saw interdisciplinary commonalities between machine learning and statistics, the subject I used to teach. In response, I co-designed a one-unit curriculum, The Math of Facial Recognition (FaceID),with a practicing high school teacher. We built the curriculum with three goals: (1) that it would aim to help teachers and students build high-level intuitions about ML, (2) that it would draw from teachers' and students' prior statistics knowledge, and (3) that it would bridge statistics and ML concepts by exploring facial recognition in smartphones, a ML application that students likely use everyday. We built custom web applications, termed "widgets," with the purpose of enabling students to explore and test hypotheses about facial recognition using images of themselves. Finally, we designed the curriculum with features that intentionally encouraged statistics teachers to adapt segments and activities of lessons for their students.That teachers would adapt a curriculum for instruction is not surprising; in fact, it is an expected component of good teaching. Drawing from studies in curriculum theory, I argue that teachers' adaptations of curriculum - from written documents, to teacher-intended curricula, to jointly-enacted curricula between teachers and students - are supported by their pedagogical design capacity (PDC) (Brown, 2009). In the context of my study, PDC refers to statistics teachers' diverse resources as designers of instruction: their statistics pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), subject-matter knowledge of statistics, students PCK, general knowledge of pedagogy, and their goals. Teachers' goals may or may not align with goals stated in the written curriculum, which can influence their adaptations. Two key goals of this work are to investigate how teachers' PDC supported their ability to adapt FaceID,and to identify their rationales for making adaptations.To implement my study, I partnered with three experienced high school statistics teachers who agreed to enact FaceID in their classrooms. I observed each teacher's enactment, noting where and how teachers made adaptations. I interviewed each teacher before and after they taught the curriculum to learn about their prior knowledge, experiences, goals, and post-implementation, the nature of their adaptations. I also asked each teacher to identify their adaptations separately in a reflection document, because I was curious to understand how teachers defined an "adaptation" in their own practice. After concluding my field work, I analyzed the data to determine what adaptations teachers made to FaceIDand their rationales for adapting segments and activities, taking note of instances where teachers interpreted their adaptations differently than the researchers.

ISBN: 9798342137614Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122828
Pedagogy.

The Mathematics of Facial Recognition: Statistics Teachers' Adaptations to a Machine Learning Curriculum.
LDR:04570nmm a2200385 4500 001 2404685
005 20241216064802.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798342137614
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31591776
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Stanfordgf326jc6533
035 $a AAI31591776
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Delaney, Victoria Leah. $3 3775006
245 1 0 $a The Mathematics of Facial Recognition: Statistics Teachers' Adaptations to a Machine Learning Curriculum.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 440 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-04, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Borko, Hilda.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2024.
520 $a Today's students are surrounded by machine learning (ML)-powered tools. Yet, few understand how they work. While there are numerous opportunities for students to learn about ML in informal settings (e.g., Alvarez et al., 2022; Druga et al., 2022) and online (e.g., code.org, Scratch), there are far fewer opportunities in the United States for students to learn about how ML works while they are in school. Although curriculum and standards frameworks have been developed to help educators navigate machine learning education, it is not yet known if teachers can or want to enact ML curriculum in their practice.As a former classroom teacher and ML graduate student, I saw interdisciplinary commonalities between machine learning and statistics, the subject I used to teach. In response, I co-designed a one-unit curriculum, The Math of Facial Recognition (FaceID),with a practicing high school teacher. We built the curriculum with three goals: (1) that it would aim to help teachers and students build high-level intuitions about ML, (2) that it would draw from teachers' and students' prior statistics knowledge, and (3) that it would bridge statistics and ML concepts by exploring facial recognition in smartphones, a ML application that students likely use everyday. We built custom web applications, termed "widgets," with the purpose of enabling students to explore and test hypotheses about facial recognition using images of themselves. Finally, we designed the curriculum with features that intentionally encouraged statistics teachers to adapt segments and activities of lessons for their students.That teachers would adapt a curriculum for instruction is not surprising; in fact, it is an expected component of good teaching. Drawing from studies in curriculum theory, I argue that teachers' adaptations of curriculum - from written documents, to teacher-intended curricula, to jointly-enacted curricula between teachers and students - are supported by their pedagogical design capacity (PDC) (Brown, 2009). In the context of my study, PDC refers to statistics teachers' diverse resources as designers of instruction: their statistics pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), subject-matter knowledge of statistics, students PCK, general knowledge of pedagogy, and their goals. Teachers' goals may or may not align with goals stated in the written curriculum, which can influence their adaptations. Two key goals of this work are to investigate how teachers' PDC supported their ability to adapt FaceID,and to identify their rationales for making adaptations.To implement my study, I partnered with three experienced high school statistics teachers who agreed to enact FaceID in their classrooms. I observed each teacher's enactment, noting where and how teachers made adaptations. I interviewed each teacher before and after they taught the curriculum to learn about their prior knowledge, experiences, goals, and post-implementation, the nature of their adaptations. I also asked each teacher to identify their adaptations separately in a reflection document, because I was curious to understand how teachers defined an "adaptation" in their own practice. After concluding my field work, I analyzed the data to determine what adaptations teachers made to FaceIDand their rationales for adapting segments and activities, taking note of instances where teachers interpreted their adaptations differently than the researchers.
590 $a School code: 0212.
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 2122828
650 4 $a Computer science. $3 523869
650 4 $a Writing. $3 551664
650 4 $a Adaptation. $3 3562958
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Core curriculum. $3 3559991
650 4 $a Teachers. $3 529573
650 4 $a Classrooms. $3 1598668
650 4 $a Schools. $3 573554
650 4 $a Science education. $3 521340
650 4 $a Design. $3 518875
650 4 $a Digital technology. $3 3561497
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0984
690 $a 0800
690 $a 0456
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0714
690 $a 0727
710 2 $a Stanford University. $3 754827
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-04B.
790 $a 0212
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31591776