東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Examining the Relationship Between S...

Chandarlis, Elias Hazen.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Examining the Relationship Between Social Trust, Empathic Concern, the Principle of Care, and Low-Cost and High-Cost Prosocial Behaviors in Sociodemographic Contexts.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Examining the Relationship Between Social Trust, Empathic Concern, the Principle of Care, and Low-Cost and High-Cost Prosocial Behaviors in Sociodemographic Contexts./
Author:	Chandarlis, Elias Hazen.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
Description:	141 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-12A.
Subject:	Personality psychology. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31348857
ISBN:	9798382738192

Examining the Relationship Between Social Trust, Empathic Concern, the Principle of Care, and Low-Cost and High-Cost Prosocial Behaviors in Sociodemographic Contexts.
Chandarlis, Elias Hazen.

Examining the Relationship Between Social Trust, Empathic Concern, the Principle of Care, and Low-Cost and High-Cost Prosocial Behaviors in Sociodemographic Contexts. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 141 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2024.

Humans have an enormous capacity to act prosocially, yet global trends indicate a decline in such behaviors. Considering the importance of prosocial behaviors for individuals and society, it is crucial to explore the various factors and contexts influencing prosocial behaviors. Existing gaps in the literature limit a deeper understanding of the contributors to prosocial behaviors. Studies on prosocial behaviors have typically focused on emotional contributors, while cognitive and social factors like the principle of care and social trust have been less examined. In addition, few studies have treated prosocial behaviors as a multidimensional construct, while the majority of studies on prosocial behaviors have utilized youth samples from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) backgrounds.The current study utilizes data from 1,339 participants in the 2004 National Opinion Research Center General Social Survey. This study examines the relationships between empathic concern, the principle of care, social trust, and the frequency of low- and high-cost prosocial behaviors across various sociodemographic contexts. Additionally, this study examined the similarities and differences in these relationships across the sociodemographic contexts of racial and ethnic background, gender, socioeconomic status, and age.A series of One-Way Welch ANOVAs revealed significant sociodemographic differences in contributors and types of prosocial behaviors. A path analysis showed that while the principle of care was associated with both high- and low-cost prosocial behaviors, social trust was associated with only high-cost prosocial behaviors, and empathic concern was associated with{A0}only low-cost prosocial behaviors. Furthermore, the results of a series of multigroup path analyses demonstrated the stability of the principle of care's importance on prosocial behaviors across sociodemographic contexts, while the degree of relationship between empathic concern, social trust, and prosocial behaviors varied significantly across racial and ethnic background, gender, socioeconomic status, and age.These findings highlight the importance of considering emotional, cognitive, and social contributors, different types of prosocial behaviors, and various sociodemographic contexts when researching prosocial behaviors. Furthermore, professionals who are designing programs and interventions to promote prosocial behaviors need to tailor their approaches based on the participants' sociodemographic backgrounds and influences of different emotional, cognitive, and social factors.{A0}

ISBN: 9798382738192Subjects--Topical Terms:

2144789
Personality psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Prosocial behavior

Examining the Relationship Between Social Trust, Empathic Concern, the Principle of Care, and Low-Cost and High-Cost Prosocial Behaviors in Sociodemographic Contexts.
LDR:03959nmm a2200421 4500 001 2404523
005 20241213095558.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798382738192
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31348857
035 $a (MiAaPQ)umichrackham005399
035 $a AAI31348857
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Chandarlis, Elias Hazen. $3 3774839
245 1 0 $a Examining the Relationship Between Social Trust, Empathic Concern, the Principle of Care, and Low-Cost and High-Cost Prosocial Behaviors in Sociodemographic Contexts.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 141 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Park, Nansook.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2024.
520 $a Humans have an enormous capacity to act prosocially, yet global trends indicate a decline in such behaviors. Considering the importance of prosocial behaviors for individuals and society, it is crucial to explore the various factors and contexts influencing prosocial behaviors. Existing gaps in the literature limit a deeper understanding of the contributors to prosocial behaviors. Studies on prosocial behaviors have typically focused on emotional contributors, while cognitive and social factors like the principle of care and social trust have been less examined. In addition, few studies have treated prosocial behaviors as a multidimensional construct, while the majority of studies on prosocial behaviors have utilized youth samples from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) backgrounds.The current study utilizes data from 1,339 participants in the 2004 National Opinion Research Center General Social Survey. This study examines the relationships between empathic concern, the principle of care, social trust, and the frequency of low- and high-cost prosocial behaviors across various sociodemographic contexts. Additionally, this study examined the similarities and differences in these relationships across the sociodemographic contexts of racial and ethnic background, gender, socioeconomic status, and age.A series of One-Way Welch ANOVAs revealed significant sociodemographic differences in contributors and types of prosocial behaviors. A path analysis showed that while the principle of care was associated with both high- and low-cost prosocial behaviors, social trust was associated with only high-cost prosocial behaviors, and empathic concern was associated with{A0}only low-cost prosocial behaviors. Furthermore, the results of a series of multigroup path analyses demonstrated the stability of the principle of care's importance on prosocial behaviors across sociodemographic contexts, while the degree of relationship between empathic concern, social trust, and prosocial behaviors varied significantly across racial and ethnic background, gender, socioeconomic status, and age.These findings highlight the importance of considering emotional, cognitive, and social contributors, different types of prosocial behaviors, and various sociodemographic contexts when researching prosocial behaviors. Furthermore, professionals who are designing programs and interventions to promote prosocial behaviors need to tailor their approaches based on the participants' sociodemographic backgrounds and influences of different emotional, cognitive, and social factors.{A0}
590 $a School code: 0127.
650 4 $a Personality psychology. $3 2144789
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
650 4 $a Ethnic studies. $2 bicssc $3 1556779
653 $a Prosocial behavior
653 $a Social trust
653 $a Principle of care
653 $a Empathic concern
653 $a Socioeconomic status
653 $a Sociodemographic contexts
690 $a 0625
690 $a 0631
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0384
710 2 $a University of Michigan. $b Psychology. $3 2098923
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-12A.
790 $a 0127
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31348857