東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The Progress and Longstanding Injust...

Freel, Samuel.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Progress and Longstanding Injustice Narratives and Their Impact on Collective Action for Racial Justice.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The Progress and Longstanding Injustice Narratives and Their Impact on Collective Action for Racial Justice./
Author:	Freel, Samuel.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
Description:	237 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-11A.
Subject:	Psychology. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30997462
ISBN:	9798382767994

The Progress and Longstanding Injustice Narratives and Their Impact on Collective Action for Racial Justice.
Freel, Samuel.

The Progress and Longstanding Injustice Narratives and Their Impact on Collective Action for Racial Justice. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 237 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--New York University, 2024.

In the United States, there are two competing narratives about the nation's racial history: the progress narrative and the longstanding injustice narrative. My dissertation examines the influence of these two narratives on collective action (e.g., protest) among White and Black Americans. Conducted amid the anti-racist protests of Summer 2020, Study 1 used a cross-sectional survey design to (1) develop measures of endorsement of the progress narrative and the longstanding injustice narrative, and (2) examine how endorsement of each narrative is related to collective action support, and its psychological antecedents including affective injustice, collective efficacy beliefs, and collective guilt (among White Americans). In path analyses, the longstanding injustice narrative was associated with higher affective injustice, higher efficacy beliefs, higher collective guilt (among White participants), higher movement support, and higher support for radical action; the progress narrative was associated with lower affective injustice, higher efficacy beliefs (among Black but not White participants), lower collective guilt (among White participants), lower movement support, and lower support for radical action. Studies 2 and 3 were both experimental, and aimed to examine the causal effects of narrative salience on support for different forms of collective action for racial justice, support for collective action, and its psychological antecedents. While Study 2 examined support for collective action for racial injustice in general, Study 3 examined support for collective action in response to an ambiguous racial event. Findings from Study 2 provided little support for the causal impact of narratives on general support for collective action. In Study 3, the longstanding injustice condition increased affective injustice, overall movement support, attributions of racism, and support for radical change. My dissertation provides preliminary evidence for both narratives (but especially the longstanding injustice) shaping interpretations of the racial status quo and collective action for racial justice. Consequently, it sets the groundwork for future research on related questions.

ISBN: 9798382767994Subjects--Topical Terms:

519075
Psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Racial history

The Progress and Longstanding Injustice Narratives and Their Impact on Collective Action for Racial Justice.
LDR:03404nmm a2200397 4500 001 2404494
005 20241213095550.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798382767994
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30997462
035 $a AAI30997462
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Freel, Samuel. $3 3774809
245 1 0 $a The Progress and Longstanding Injustice Narratives and Their Impact on Collective Action for Racial Justice.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 237 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Bilali, Rezarta.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--New York University, 2024.
520 $a In the United States, there are two competing narratives about the nation's racial history: the progress narrative and the longstanding injustice narrative. My dissertation examines the influence of these two narratives on collective action (e.g., protest) among White and Black Americans. Conducted amid the anti-racist protests of Summer 2020, Study 1 used a cross-sectional survey design to (1) develop measures of endorsement of the progress narrative and the longstanding injustice narrative, and (2) examine how endorsement of each narrative is related to collective action support, and its psychological antecedents including affective injustice, collective efficacy beliefs, and collective guilt (among White Americans). In path analyses, the longstanding injustice narrative was associated with higher affective injustice, higher efficacy beliefs, higher collective guilt (among White participants), higher movement support, and higher support for radical action; the progress narrative was associated with lower affective injustice, higher efficacy beliefs (among Black but not White participants), lower collective guilt (among White participants), lower movement support, and lower support for radical action. Studies 2 and 3 were both experimental, and aimed to examine the causal effects of narrative salience on support for different forms of collective action for racial justice, support for collective action, and its psychological antecedents. While Study 2 examined support for collective action for racial injustice in general, Study 3 examined support for collective action in response to an ambiguous racial event. Findings from Study 2 provided little support for the causal impact of narratives on general support for collective action. In Study 3, the longstanding injustice condition increased affective injustice, overall movement support, attributions of racism, and support for radical change. My dissertation provides preliminary evidence for both narratives (but especially the longstanding injustice) shaping interpretations of the racial status quo and collective action for racial justice. Consequently, it sets the groundwork for future research on related questions.
590 $a School code: 0146.
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Ethnic studies. $2 bicssc $3 1556779
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
650 4 $a Black studies. $3 2122689
653 $a Racial history
653 $a Black Americans
653 $a Historical narratives
653 $a Collective action
653 $a Racial justice
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0631
690 $a 0325
690 $a 0451
710 2 $a New York University. $b Applied Psychology. $3 2100461
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-11A.
790 $a 0146
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30997462