東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Marginal Bone Level Change Around Im...

Omeishi, Mohammed Qasim .

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Marginal Bone Level Change Around Implants Supporting Full Arch Zirconia Fixed Prostheses.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Marginal Bone Level Change Around Implants Supporting Full Arch Zirconia Fixed Prostheses./
Author:	Omeishi, Mohammed Qasim .
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
Description:	62 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-04.
Subject:	Dentistry. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30765110
ISBN:	9798380419116

Marginal Bone Level Change Around Implants Supporting Full Arch Zirconia Fixed Prostheses.
Omeishi, Mohammed Qasim .

Marginal Bone Level Change Around Implants Supporting Full Arch Zirconia Fixed Prostheses. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 62 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Illinois at Chicago, 2023.

The primary aim of this retrospective study was to assess the change in marginal bone level around implants supporting full-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses after a minimum service period of one year. The secondary aim was to identify potential predictors of marginal bone loss. All prostheses were delivered at the UIC College of Dentistry Prosthodontic clinic between January 2010 and June 2020. To measure marginal bone change, periapical radiographs taken at prosthesis delivery and at last follow-up visit, were obtained from the Axium electronic health record. Calibration and measurement of radiographs using ImageJ software (U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA), ensured accuracy and consistency. A subsample of participant clinical records from a previous retrospective study of zirconia prostheses conducted in the Department of Restorative Dentistry provided the radiographs. Evaluation of potential predictors of peri-implant marginal bone loss included maxillary or mandibular arch, implant number, implant position, follow-up time, and implant manufacturer. Descriptive data for mean peri-implant marginal bone change, stratified by the potential predictors above, were calculated and presented in table format. The statistical analysis utilized a generalized estimating equation (GEE) modeling approach, which accounted for the hierarchical nature of the data (implants within prostheses). The final model included the variables of arch, implant angle, implant number, implant position, and follow-up time. The predictors above showed little evidence of association with marginal bone changes, with the exception of follow-up time. For mesial bone change measurements, the follow-up interval of 5-8 years, compared to 1-3 years, yielded a marginal bone loss of 0.265mm, 95% confidence interval (CI) of .0027 to 0.50, and a p value of 0.029. Although a null effect of implant angulation on mesial marginal bone change cannot be ruled out, the null value is near the upper confidence limit, and the change in the direction of mean bone level change is slight (-0.110mm, 95% CI [-0.224, 0.004], p= 0.059). All other estimates are consistent with the null hypothesis. All observed mean bone level changes were within published levels for clinical acceptability.

ISBN: 9798380419116Subjects--Topical Terms:

828971
Dentistry.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Marginal bone level

Marginal Bone Level Change Around Implants Supporting Full Arch Zirconia Fixed Prostheses.
LDR:03458nmm a2200361 4500 001 2404368
005 20241209114613.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798380419116
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30765110
035 $a (MiAaPQ)0799vireo3854Omeishi
035 $a AAI30765110
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Omeishi, Mohammed Qasim . $3 3774681
245 1 0 $a Marginal Bone Level Change Around Implants Supporting Full Arch Zirconia Fixed Prostheses.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 62 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04.
500 $a Advisor: Al-Tarawneh, Sandra.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--University of Illinois at Chicago, 2023.
520 $a The primary aim of this retrospective study was to assess the change in marginal bone level around implants supporting full-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses after a minimum service period of one year. The secondary aim was to identify potential predictors of marginal bone loss. All prostheses were delivered at the UIC College of Dentistry Prosthodontic clinic between January 2010 and June 2020. To measure marginal bone change, periapical radiographs taken at prosthesis delivery and at last follow-up visit, were obtained from the Axium electronic health record. Calibration and measurement of radiographs using ImageJ software (U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA), ensured accuracy and consistency. A subsample of participant clinical records from a previous retrospective study of zirconia prostheses conducted in the Department of Restorative Dentistry provided the radiographs. Evaluation of potential predictors of peri-implant marginal bone loss included maxillary or mandibular arch, implant number, implant position, follow-up time, and implant manufacturer. Descriptive data for mean peri-implant marginal bone change, stratified by the potential predictors above, were calculated and presented in table format. The statistical analysis utilized a generalized estimating equation (GEE) modeling approach, which accounted for the hierarchical nature of the data (implants within prostheses). The final model included the variables of arch, implant angle, implant number, implant position, and follow-up time. The predictors above showed little evidence of association with marginal bone changes, with the exception of follow-up time. For mesial bone change measurements, the follow-up interval of 5-8 years, compared to 1-3 years, yielded a marginal bone loss of 0.265mm, 95% confidence interval (CI) of .0027 to 0.50, and a p value of 0.029. Although a null effect of implant angulation on mesial marginal bone change cannot be ruled out, the null value is near the upper confidence limit, and the change in the direction of mean bone level change is slight (-0.110mm, 95% CI [-0.224, 0.004], p= 0.059). All other estimates are consistent with the null hypothesis. All observed mean bone level changes were within published levels for clinical acceptability.
590 $a School code: 0799.
650 4 $a Dentistry. $3 828971
650 4 $a Biomedical engineering. $3 535387
653 $a Marginal bone level
653 $a Generalized estimating equation
653 $a Periapical radiographs
690 $a 0567
690 $a 0541
710 2 $a University of Illinois at Chicago. $b Restorative Dentistry. $3 3774682
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-04.
790 $a 0799
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30765110