東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Digitalisation as an Act of Governan...

Solman, Helena M.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Digitalisation as an Act of Governance: The Case of Wind Energy.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Digitalisation as an Act of Governance: The Case of Wind Energy./
作者:	Solman, Helena M.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	194 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-04B.
標題:	Communication. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30681800
ISBN:	9798380571906

Digitalisation as an Act of Governance: The Case of Wind Energy.
Solman, Helena M.

Digitalisation as an Act of Governance: The Case of Wind Energy. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 194 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wageningen University and Research, 2023.

The transition to renewable energy sources is necessary to assure a sustainable future for current and future generations and ecosystems on our planet. But while there is growing recognition {if not consensus) on the need for these alternative sources of energy, there is an ongoing debate amongst experts and societal actors on how, where and by whom renewable energy systems should be designed, planned and managed. Wind energy is a case in point. Perhaps one of the most controversial forms of renewable energy, due to the perceived visual and ecological impacts of turbines of land and seascapes, debate centres around how and by whom both problems around wind energy are defined and implemented through design, planning and management. This means that the challenge of energy transitions is not merely an issue of developing and deploying renewable energy technologies, but a fundamentally social challenge of aligning what is technically possible with what is 'acceptable' to diverse and often increasingly polarised societies. Yet despite the recognition given to incorporating both expert and societal perspectives into the design and management of wind energy, much of the debate remains highly technical in nature.The question of enabling more inclusive forms of wind energy governance, to ensure both just and sustainable energy transitions across landscapes, is of great contemporary importance. Nevertheless, this question is not new. Participation in wind energy governance has long been a major focus of scholarship, policy and practice. However, much of this literature has focused on the planned participation of local communities in the siting of wind parks. in doing so, the researchers have tended to narrow diverse community concerns to technical issues, such as wind turbine noise or the visual impact of wind farms. Once narrowed, these concerns have become sites of debate and innovation that are dominated by a narrow set of technical expertise and knowledge.Despite all the attempts to involve the public in wind energy decisions, technical experts remain the key determining how, where and by whom wind energy technologies are designed, implemented and managed over time. By lending their expert knowledge to the design of new technologies, such as wind turbines, they become the de facto governors of the environmental problems at stake. However, while various kinds of professional expertise clearly have important stakes in wind energy governance, the role of experts tends to be underplayed and, in turn, poorly understood in terms of the challenges and dilemmas that these actors experience in wind energy decision-making.The advent of digital technologies in the wind energy sector offers an opportunity to rethink participation in wind energy governance. Digital technologies are used to address public concerns about wind energy, most notably in planning of wind energy projects. As a result of these advances, upscaling wind energy is increasingly linked to a large-scale adoption of digital technologies. The proliferation of digital technologies is often referred to as a process of digitalisation. Given this importance of digital technologies, a better understanding of digitalisation and its effects on how the different concerns about wind energy are governed is needed.

ISBN: 9798380571906Subjects--Topical Terms:

524709
Communication.

Digitalisation as an Act of Governance: The Case of Wind Energy.
LDR:04536nmm a2200433 4500 001 2404170
005 20241203090549.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798380571906
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30681800
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Wageningen615870
035 $a AAI30681800
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Solman, Helena M. $3 3774464
245 1 0 $a Digitalisation as an Act of Governance: The Case of Wind Energy.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 194 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Bush, Simon R.;Smits, Mattijs;van Vliet, Bas.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wageningen University and Research, 2023.
520 $a The transition to renewable energy sources is necessary to assure a sustainable future for current and future generations and ecosystems on our planet. But while there is growing recognition {if not consensus) on the need for these alternative sources of energy, there is an ongoing debate amongst experts and societal actors on how, where and by whom renewable energy systems should be designed, planned and managed. Wind energy is a case in point. Perhaps one of the most controversial forms of renewable energy, due to the perceived visual and ecological impacts of turbines of land and seascapes, debate centres around how and by whom both problems around wind energy are defined and implemented through design, planning and management. This means that the challenge of energy transitions is not merely an issue of developing and deploying renewable energy technologies, but a fundamentally social challenge of aligning what is technically possible with what is 'acceptable' to diverse and often increasingly polarised societies. Yet despite the recognition given to incorporating both expert and societal perspectives into the design and management of wind energy, much of the debate remains highly technical in nature.The question of enabling more inclusive forms of wind energy governance, to ensure both just and sustainable energy transitions across landscapes, is of great contemporary importance. Nevertheless, this question is not new. Participation in wind energy governance has long been a major focus of scholarship, policy and practice. However, much of this literature has focused on the planned participation of local communities in the siting of wind parks. in doing so, the researchers have tended to narrow diverse community concerns to technical issues, such as wind turbine noise or the visual impact of wind farms. Once narrowed, these concerns have become sites of debate and innovation that are dominated by a narrow set of technical expertise and knowledge.Despite all the attempts to involve the public in wind energy decisions, technical experts remain the key determining how, where and by whom wind energy technologies are designed, implemented and managed over time. By lending their expert knowledge to the design of new technologies, such as wind turbines, they become the de facto governors of the environmental problems at stake. However, while various kinds of professional expertise clearly have important stakes in wind energy governance, the role of experts tends to be underplayed and, in turn, poorly understood in terms of the challenges and dilemmas that these actors experience in wind energy decision-making.The advent of digital technologies in the wind energy sector offers an opportunity to rethink participation in wind energy governance. Digital technologies are used to address public concerns about wind energy, most notably in planning of wind energy projects. As a result of these advances, upscaling wind energy is increasingly linked to a large-scale adoption of digital technologies. The proliferation of digital technologies is often referred to as a process of digitalisation. Given this importance of digital technologies, a better understanding of digitalisation and its effects on how the different concerns about wind energy are governed is needed.
590 $a School code: 2157.
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Ontology. $3 530874
650 4 $a Politics. $3 685427
650 4 $a Debates. $3 3564086
650 4 $a Soil erosion. $3 602940
650 4 $a Community. $3 531337
650 4 $a Noise pollution. $3 542275
650 4 $a Innovations. $3 754112
650 4 $a Turbines. $3 2139444
650 4 $a Wind power. $3 672558
650 4 $a Citizen participation. $3 3560084
650 4 $a Sensors. $3 3549539
650 4 $a Design. $3 518875
650 4 $a Digital technology. $3 3561497
650 4 $a Agriculture. $3 518588
650 4 $a Alternative energy. $3 3436775
650 4 $a Atmospheric sciences. $3 3168354
650 4 $a Energy. $3 876794
650 4 $a Information technology. $3 532993
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Soil sciences. $3 2122699
650 4 $a Web studies. $3 2122754
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0800
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0473
690 $a 0363
690 $a 0725
690 $a 0791
690 $a 0489
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0481
690 $a 0646
710 2 $a Wageningen University and Research. $3 3557914
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-04B.
790 $a 2157
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30681800