東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

What Is Trauma?: From Science to Soc...

Carlisle, Judith.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

What Is Trauma?: From Science to Social Justice.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	What Is Trauma?: From Science to Social Justice./
作者:	Carlisle, Judith.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
面頁冊數:	127 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-10, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-10B.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31239943
ISBN:	9798382318257

What Is Trauma?: From Science to Social Justice.
Carlisle, Judith.

What Is Trauma?: From Science to Social Justice. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 127 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-10, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Washington University in St. Louis, 2024.

In recent years, the term "trauma" has become increasingly controversial. Many of these controversies revolve around the definition of trauma, and the way that this definition varies across contexts. What kinds of experience can plausibly be considered "traumatic"? In some contexts, the standards are incredibly permissive, while others are much more restrictive. These different ways of understanding "trauma" prompts an important question: Who has the authority to define trauma? In other words, who decides which conception of trauma is the most "legitimate" - who decides when an experience is or is not traumatic? My project attempts to answer these questions by considering each of the different conceptions of trauma that arise in a variety of distinct contexts. In particular, I will recognize three major areas making use of the concept: I will attempt to outline the theories of trauma that arise from (1) The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), from (2) animal researchers in neuroscience and similar laboratory settings, from (3) theories of trauma in clinical psychology. Then, I argue that there is need for yet another conception, what I call the Social Ameliorative Conception of Trauma which helps us to acknowledge and recognize potentially novel kinds/cases of trauma. Finally, I conclude by attempting to unify these disparate perspectives with my Schematic Account of Trauma.

ISBN: 9798382318257Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Social justice

What Is Trauma?: From Science to Social Justice.
LDR:02639nmm a2200421 4500 001 2403931
005 20241122094148.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798382318257
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31239943
035 $a AAI31239943
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Carlisle, Judith. $3 3774213
245 1 0 $a What Is Trauma?: From Science to Social Justice.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 127 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-10, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Craver, Carl.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Washington University in St. Louis, 2024.
520 $a In recent years, the term "trauma" has become increasingly controversial. Many of these controversies revolve around the definition of trauma, and the way that this definition varies across contexts. What kinds of experience can plausibly be considered "traumatic"? In some contexts, the standards are incredibly permissive, while others are much more restrictive. These different ways of understanding "trauma" prompts an important question: Who has the authority to define trauma? In other words, who decides which conception of trauma is the most "legitimate" - who decides when an experience is or is not traumatic? My project attempts to answer these questions by considering each of the different conceptions of trauma that arise in a variety of distinct contexts. In particular, I will recognize three major areas making use of the concept: I will attempt to outline the theories of trauma that arise from (1) The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), from (2) animal researchers in neuroscience and similar laboratory settings, from (3) theories of trauma in clinical psychology. Then, I argue that there is need for yet another conception, what I call the Social Ameliorative Conception of Trauma which helps us to acknowledge and recognize potentially novel kinds/cases of trauma. Finally, I conclude by attempting to unify these disparate perspectives with my Schematic Account of Trauma.
590 $a School code: 0252.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Therapy. $3 3343697
650 4 $a Neurosciences. $3 588700
650 4 $a Mental health. $3 534751
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 524863
653 $a Social justice
653 $a Post-traumatic stress disorder
653 $a Trauma
653 $a Disparate perspectives
653 $a Social ameliorative conception
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0212
690 $a 0317
690 $a 0347
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0451
710 2 $a Washington University in St. Louis. $b Philosophy-Neuroscience-Psychology. $3 3774214
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-10B.
790 $a 0252
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31239943