東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A Legislative Comparative Assessment...

Odeibat, Mohammad A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Legislative Comparative Assessment of Challenging Arbitral Awards Under UNCITRAL Model Law: A New Harmonised Proposed Model for Challenging Arbitral Awards.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Legislative Comparative Assessment of Challenging Arbitral Awards Under UNCITRAL Model Law: A New Harmonised Proposed Model for Challenging Arbitral Awards./
作者:	Odeibat, Mohammad A.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	349 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-11B.
標題:	Treaties. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31040133
ISBN:	9798382641577

A Legislative Comparative Assessment of Challenging Arbitral Awards Under UNCITRAL Model Law: A New Harmonised Proposed Model for Challenging Arbitral Awards.
Odeibat, Mohammad A.

A Legislative Comparative Assessment of Challenging Arbitral Awards Under UNCITRAL Model Law: A New Harmonised Proposed Model for Challenging Arbitral Awards. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 349 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Manchester (United Kingdom), 2023.

The issue of challenging arbitral awards is anaylsed in this thesis due to its fundamental and somewhat controversial nature within the field arbitration. This is because such an issue is an unavoidable necessity and is, at the same time, a source of difficulty that may jeopardise the principles and advantages of arbitration. Therefore, this thesis provides an examination of all the aspects related to the given issue. This examination is based on content analysis of over one hundred national arbitration legislations on the one hand and based on an in-depth analysis of the arbitration legislations and the jurisdictions (law cases) of Egypt, England and Jordan in light of the UNCITRAL Model Law (ML) on the other hand. Based on the arguments and the findings of this examination, the thesis will propose a model to harmonise the grounds related to the issue of challenging arbitral awards, including both the prerequisite grounds and legal grounds, in the same manner in which the New York Convention (NYC) attempted to harmonise the grounds for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. It is argued that the model proposed by the thesis is an attempt to highlight and emphasise the somewhat quasi-universal consensus in the wide spectrum of the legislations examined in the context of challenging arbitral awards. Therefore, it is expected that the comprehensiveness of the grounds for challenging arbitral awards in the proposed model and the rationales provided for the inclusion of each of these grounds will be convincing enough for as many countries as possible to ratify the proposed model when it is presented before them as an international convention. Indeed, the feasibility of enacting the proposed model as an international convention would not only be possible but would be very high. The enactment of such an international convention would encourage standardising the practices of national courts globally when addressing any challenges to arbitral awards. This in turn could minimise the chances of annulling arbitral awards due to local particularities and, therefore, safeguard the integrity of international arbitration as an international dispute resolution mechanism.

ISBN: 9798382641577Subjects--Topical Terms:

677024
Treaties.

A Legislative Comparative Assessment of Challenging Arbitral Awards Under UNCITRAL Model Law: A New Harmonised Proposed Model for Challenging Arbitral Awards.
LDR:03460nmm a2200373 4500 001 2403909
005 20241122094141.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798382641577
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31040133
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Manchester_UK9fae34cf-0bd9-4578-8ef6-2663ade75b12
035 $a AAI31040133
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Odeibat, Mohammad A. $3 3774193
245 1 2 $a A Legislative Comparative Assessment of Challenging Arbitral Awards Under UNCITRAL Model Law: A New Harmonised Proposed Model for Challenging Arbitral Awards.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 349 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Tarawneh, Jasem;Butler, Nicolette.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Manchester (United Kingdom), 2023.
520 $a The issue of challenging arbitral awards is anaylsed in this thesis due to its fundamental and somewhat controversial nature within the field arbitration. This is because such an issue is an unavoidable necessity and is, at the same time, a source of difficulty that may jeopardise the principles and advantages of arbitration. Therefore, this thesis provides an examination of all the aspects related to the given issue. This examination is based on content analysis of over one hundred national arbitration legislations on the one hand and based on an in-depth analysis of the arbitration legislations and the jurisdictions (law cases) of Egypt, England and Jordan in light of the UNCITRAL Model Law (ML) on the other hand. Based on the arguments and the findings of this examination, the thesis will propose a model to harmonise the grounds related to the issue of challenging arbitral awards, including both the prerequisite grounds and legal grounds, in the same manner in which the New York Convention (NYC) attempted to harmonise the grounds for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. It is argued that the model proposed by the thesis is an attempt to highlight and emphasise the somewhat quasi-universal consensus in the wide spectrum of the legislations examined in the context of challenging arbitral awards. Therefore, it is expected that the comprehensiveness of the grounds for challenging arbitral awards in the proposed model and the rationales provided for the inclusion of each of these grounds will be convincing enough for as many countries as possible to ratify the proposed model when it is presented before them as an international convention. Indeed, the feasibility of enacting the proposed model as an international convention would not only be possible but would be very high. The enactment of such an international convention would encourage standardising the practices of national courts globally when addressing any challenges to arbitral awards. This in turn could minimise the chances of annulling arbitral awards due to local particularities and, therefore, safeguard the integrity of international arbitration as an international dispute resolution mechanism.
590 $a School code: 1543.
650 4 $a Treaties. $3 677024
650 4 $a Investments. $3 566987
650 4 $a Sports arbitration. $3 3773146
650 4 $a Tourism. $3 536870
650 4 $a Disputes. $3 3707223
650 4 $a Litigation. $3 3564647
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Alternative dispute resolution. $3 3168470
650 4 $a Kinesiology. $3 517627
650 4 $a Finance. $3 542899
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Recreation. $3 535376
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0649
690 $a 0575
690 $a 0508
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0814
710 2 $a The University of Manchester (United Kingdom). $3 3422292
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-11B.
790 $a 1543
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31040133