東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Preparing students for citizenship: ...

Fernandez, Luke O.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Preparing students for citizenship: The pedagogical vision of Yale's Noah Porter, Harvard's Charles Eliot and Princeton's Woodrow Wilson.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Preparing students for citizenship: The pedagogical vision of Yale's Noah Porter, Harvard's Charles Eliot and Princeton's Woodrow Wilson./
作者:	Fernandez, Luke O.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 1997,
面頁冊數:	249 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 59-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International59-02A.
標題:	Education history. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9728389
ISBN:	9780591373684

Preparing students for citizenship: The pedagogical vision of Yale's Noah Porter, Harvard's Charles Eliot and Princeton's Woodrow Wilson.
Fernandez, Luke O.

Preparing students for citizenship: The pedagogical vision of Yale's Noah Porter, Harvard's Charles Eliot and Princeton's Woodrow Wilson. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 1997 - 249 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 59-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Cornell University, 1997.

The dissertation examines the historic role of elite higher education in preparing students for active participation in political life. It does this by examining the pedagogical visions and curricular commitments of Noah Porter (president of Yale from 1871 to 1886), Charles Eliot (president of Harvard from 1869 to 1909) and Woodrow Wilson (president of Princeton from 1902 to 1910). Educational historians have usually cast Eliot as the progressive force in American higher education while painting Porter and Wilson in diminished or even contrary roles. While this dissertation does not take issue with the basic thrust of this history, it focuses on deficiencies in all three of these educators' approaches that served to compromise their commitment to strong civic education. These educators compromised, or threatened to compromise, civic education because they ascribed to ideals and practices which are often at odds with the development of citizenship. The determination of these educators' civic commitments is circumscribed by the dissertation's exclusive focus on a republican definition of citizenship. Republicans equate citizenship with participation in political life and are consequently threatened by rhetorical and economic practices which appear to discourage political participation. The dissertation assesses how dedicated Porter, Eliot, and Wilson were to the ideals of republican citizenship by examining their commitment to forms of communication that foster political discussion, and by examining their attachment to economic practices that republican theorists have found inimical to citizenship. The rhetorical and economic proclivities of Porter, Eliot, and Wilson constitute the main approaches for gauging their civic commitments. However, these two approaches are framed and clarified by describing their sympathy for elite and exclusionary forms of higher education and by delineating their overt exhortations to service and their attempts to integrate their schools into a larger public sphere. All of their civic visions were ultimately compromised but they were compromised in different ways. Eliot's civic commitments were compromised by rhetorical and economic proclivities that were closely tied to his strong sympathies for professionalization. Porter's were threatened by an attraction to cloistered living and by archaic pedagogies. Of the three, Wilson displayed the most abiding civic commitments. But even Wilson's civic commitments were ultimately compromised by his attraction to elite forms of education.

ISBN: 9780591373684Subjects--Topical Terms:

3171959
Education history.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Connecticut

Preparing students for citizenship: The pedagogical vision of Yale's Noah Porter, Harvard's Charles Eliot and Princeton's Woodrow Wilson.
LDR:03961nmm a2200469 4500 001 2403821
005 20241125080229.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s1997 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780591373684
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI9728389
035 $a AAI9728389
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Fernandez, Luke O. $3 3774102
245 1 0 $a Preparing students for citizenship: The pedagogical vision of Yale's Noah Porter, Harvard's Charles Eliot and Princeton's Woodrow Wilson.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 1997
300 $a 249 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 59-02, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Kramnick, I.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Cornell University, 1997.
520 $a The dissertation examines the historic role of elite higher education in preparing students for active participation in political life. It does this by examining the pedagogical visions and curricular commitments of Noah Porter (president of Yale from 1871 to 1886), Charles Eliot (president of Harvard from 1869 to 1909) and Woodrow Wilson (president of Princeton from 1902 to 1910). Educational historians have usually cast Eliot as the progressive force in American higher education while painting Porter and Wilson in diminished or even contrary roles. While this dissertation does not take issue with the basic thrust of this history, it focuses on deficiencies in all three of these educators' approaches that served to compromise their commitment to strong civic education. These educators compromised, or threatened to compromise, civic education because they ascribed to ideals and practices which are often at odds with the development of citizenship. The determination of these educators' civic commitments is circumscribed by the dissertation's exclusive focus on a republican definition of citizenship. Republicans equate citizenship with participation in political life and are consequently threatened by rhetorical and economic practices which appear to discourage political participation. The dissertation assesses how dedicated Porter, Eliot, and Wilson were to the ideals of republican citizenship by examining their commitment to forms of communication that foster political discussion, and by examining their attachment to economic practices that republican theorists have found inimical to citizenship. The rhetorical and economic proclivities of Porter, Eliot, and Wilson constitute the main approaches for gauging their civic commitments. However, these two approaches are framed and clarified by describing their sympathy for elite and exclusionary forms of higher education and by delineating their overt exhortations to service and their attempts to integrate their schools into a larger public sphere. All of their civic visions were ultimately compromised but they were compromised in different ways. Eliot's civic commitments were compromised by rhetorical and economic proclivities that were closely tied to his strong sympathies for professionalization. Porter's were threatened by an attraction to cloistered living and by archaic pedagogies. Of the three, Wilson displayed the most abiding civic commitments. But even Wilson's civic commitments were ultimately compromised by his attraction to elite forms of education.
590 $a School code: 0058.
650 4 $a Education history. $3 3171959
650 4 $a American history. $3 2122692
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Educational philosophy. $3 3173367
653 $a Connecticut
653 $a Eliot, Charles
653 $a Massachusetts
653 $a New Jersey
653 $a Porter, Noah
653 $a Wilson, Woodrow
653 $a Yale University
653 $a civic education
653 $a republicanism
690 $a 0520
690 $a 0337
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0998
710 2 $a Cornell University. $3 530586
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 59-02A.
790 $a 0058
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1997
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9728389