東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Implementing Sustainable Blue Carbon...

Brown, Lisa.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Implementing Sustainable Blue Carbon Initiatives as a Climate Change and Biodiversity Loss Solution: Restoration Considerations and Upending Conventional Top-down Governance.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Implementing Sustainable Blue Carbon Initiatives as a Climate Change and Biodiversity Loss Solution: Restoration Considerations and Upending Conventional Top-down Governance./
作者:	Brown, Lisa.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
面頁冊數:	269 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-11.
標題:	Sustainability. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31146953
ISBN:	9798382344768

Implementing Sustainable Blue Carbon Initiatives as a Climate Change and Biodiversity Loss Solution: Restoration Considerations and Upending Conventional Top-down Governance.
Brown, Lisa.

Implementing Sustainable Blue Carbon Initiatives as a Climate Change and Biodiversity Loss Solution: Restoration Considerations and Upending Conventional Top-down Governance. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 269 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11.

Thesis (A.L.M.)--Harvard University, 2024.

As international institutions (e.g., UN; World Bank), state and non-state actors, the private sector, and civil society confront the interconnected crises of climate change and biodiversity loss, an unassuming nature-based solution (NbS) fringes coastlines worldwide, ready to confront these borderless issues. Blue carbon ecosystems (BCEs) - the vegetated coastal habitats of mangroves, seagrasses, and salt marshes - are outsized performers in carbon sequestration as well as biodiversity enhancement. Yet institutional actors not only overlook deployment of BCEs in the battle against climate change, they also sanction their destruction, exacerbating rather than mitigating environmental harms.This reality raises the question of what factors would incentivize blue carbon ecosystem restoration and enhance the prospects for sustainable restoration initiatives as an intervention for climate change and biodiversity loss? The guiding hypothesis is that an integrated community-based approach to BCE rehabilitation, emphasizing social considerations, increases opportunities for sustainable initiatives that maximize blue carbon's mitigation and adaptation potential. This thesis first argues that the economic and social-ecological benefits of BCEs should catalyze increased implementation of coastal ecosystem restoration initiatives. Second, it argues that a departure from the conventional top-down market-based approach to conservation can turn the tide on BCE loss, sustainably and equitably maximizing BCE capacity by engaging and empowering communities in project development and management.In answering the research question, this study synthesizes research, economic and social theoretical arguments, sustainability principles, and original case studies to address the following knowledge gaps: the dearth of literature on the social considerations of blue carbon ecosystem restoration (e.g., community reliance on BCEs, incorporation of local and traditional knowledge, land tenure rights, participatory inclusion); the relative lack of scholarship on blue carbon co-benefits (e.g., shoreline protection; livelihood impacts; biodiversity enhancement) as compared to the market-based focus on BCE carbon sequestration potential; and the lack of social science research as compared to hard science research on BCEs. In addressing these gaps, this thesis concludes that an integrated community-based approach to BCE restoration empowers communities, establishing an equitable and economically viable pathway to sustaining coastal ecosystems and optimizing their social-ecological benefits while capturing atmospheric carbon. This research hopes to inform a collaborative, socially just governance framework and incentivize national and subnational development of BCE initiatives to mitigate environmental harms and build resilient communities.

ISBN: 9798382344768Subjects--Topical Terms:

1029978
Sustainability.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Biodiversity

Implementing Sustainable Blue Carbon Initiatives as a Climate Change and Biodiversity Loss Solution: Restoration Considerations and Upending Conventional Top-down Governance.
LDR:04131nmm a2200397 4500 001 2403468
005 20241118085744.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798382344768
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31146953
035 $a AAI31146953
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Brown, Lisa. $3 551106
245 1 0 $a Implementing Sustainable Blue Carbon Initiatives as a Climate Change and Biodiversity Loss Solution: Restoration Considerations and Upending Conventional Top-down Governance.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 269 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11.
500 $a Advisor: Buckley, George.
502 $a Thesis (A.L.M.)--Harvard University, 2024.
520 $a As international institutions (e.g., UN; World Bank), state and non-state actors, the private sector, and civil society confront the interconnected crises of climate change and biodiversity loss, an unassuming nature-based solution (NbS) fringes coastlines worldwide, ready to confront these borderless issues. Blue carbon ecosystems (BCEs) - the vegetated coastal habitats of mangroves, seagrasses, and salt marshes - are outsized performers in carbon sequestration as well as biodiversity enhancement. Yet institutional actors not only overlook deployment of BCEs in the battle against climate change, they also sanction their destruction, exacerbating rather than mitigating environmental harms.This reality raises the question of what factors would incentivize blue carbon ecosystem restoration and enhance the prospects for sustainable restoration initiatives as an intervention for climate change and biodiversity loss? The guiding hypothesis is that an integrated community-based approach to BCE rehabilitation, emphasizing social considerations, increases opportunities for sustainable initiatives that maximize blue carbon's mitigation and adaptation potential. This thesis first argues that the economic and social-ecological benefits of BCEs should catalyze increased implementation of coastal ecosystem restoration initiatives. Second, it argues that a departure from the conventional top-down market-based approach to conservation can turn the tide on BCE loss, sustainably and equitably maximizing BCE capacity by engaging and empowering communities in project development and management.In answering the research question, this study synthesizes research, economic and social theoretical arguments, sustainability principles, and original case studies to address the following knowledge gaps: the dearth of literature on the social considerations of blue carbon ecosystem restoration (e.g., community reliance on BCEs, incorporation of local and traditional knowledge, land tenure rights, participatory inclusion); the relative lack of scholarship on blue carbon co-benefits (e.g., shoreline protection; livelihood impacts; biodiversity enhancement) as compared to the market-based focus on BCE carbon sequestration potential; and the lack of social science research as compared to hard science research on BCEs. In addressing these gaps, this thesis concludes that an integrated community-based approach to BCE restoration empowers communities, establishing an equitable and economically viable pathway to sustaining coastal ecosystems and optimizing their social-ecological benefits while capturing atmospheric carbon. This research hopes to inform a collaborative, socially just governance framework and incentivize national and subnational development of BCE initiatives to mitigate environmental harms and build resilient communities.
590 $a School code: 0084.
650 4 $a Sustainability. $3 1029978
650 4 $a Climate change. $2 bicssc $3 2079509
650 4 $a Natural resource management. $3 589570
650 4 $a Ecology. $3 516476
653 $a Biodiversity
653 $a Blue carbon
653 $a Coastal ecosystem conservation
653 $a Community-based governance
653 $a Sustainable restoration initiatives
690 $a 0640
690 $a 0404
690 $a 0528
690 $a 0329
710 2 $a Harvard University. $b Extension Studies. $3 3560717
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-11.
790 $a 0084
791 $a A.L.M.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31146953