東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Examining the Impact of Methodology ...

Schwartz, Temima Devora.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Examining the Impact of Methodology on the Positivity Effect: A Meta-Analysis.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Examining the Impact of Methodology on the Positivity Effect: A Meta-Analysis./
作者:	Schwartz, Temima Devora.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
面頁冊數:	69 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-02B.
標題:	Psychology. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31486048
ISBN:	9798383623718

Examining the Impact of Methodology on the Positivity Effect: A Meta-Analysis.
Schwartz, Temima Devora.

Examining the Impact of Methodology on the Positivity Effect: A Meta-Analysis. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 69 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fielding Graduate University, 2024.

An age-related bias toward positive information in the older adult population has been identified by the literature and termed "the positivity effect." Many studies have been conducted to examine specific aspects of the positivity effect. However, those studies have introduced confounding variables, making the size of the actual positivity effect present in the overall older adult population difficult to estimate. Additionally, the methodology used by researchers has varied widely, raising the question of whether the effects observed by different studies are comparable. The goal of the present meta-analysis was to examine the overall effect size of the attentional positivity effect observed in the literature, as well as to examine the impact of methodological differences across studies on the effect sizes found. Thirty one studies were included in the meta-analysis. Meta-regression analyses were performed to examine the ability of stimulus type, attention bias measure, stimulus pairing, and effect type to explain variability in effect sizes across the sample. Results found a small aggregate effect size. Effect size variability was significantly explained by attention bias measure and effect type but not by stimulus type or stimulus pairing. Additionally, differences in the overall effect sizes of categories within each meta-regression variable were apparent, some of which were statistically significant.

ISBN: 9798383623718Subjects--Topical Terms:

519075
Psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Meta-analysis

Examining the Impact of Methodology on the Positivity Effect: A Meta-Analysis.
LDR:02637nmm a2200409 4500 001 2403367
005 20241112095404.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798383623718
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31486048
035 $a AAI31486048
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Schwartz, Temima Devora. $3 3773641
245 1 0 $a Examining the Impact of Methodology on the Positivity Effect: A Meta-Analysis.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 69 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Levin, Leanne J.;Cornelius, Allen E.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fielding Graduate University, 2024.
520 $a An age-related bias toward positive information in the older adult population has been identified by the literature and termed "the positivity effect." Many studies have been conducted to examine specific aspects of the positivity effect. However, those studies have introduced confounding variables, making the size of the actual positivity effect present in the overall older adult population difficult to estimate. Additionally, the methodology used by researchers has varied widely, raising the question of whether the effects observed by different studies are comparable. The goal of the present meta-analysis was to examine the overall effect size of the attentional positivity effect observed in the literature, as well as to examine the impact of methodological differences across studies on the effect sizes found. Thirty one studies were included in the meta-analysis. Meta-regression analyses were performed to examine the ability of stimulus type, attention bias measure, stimulus pairing, and effect type to explain variability in effect sizes across the sample. Results found a small aggregate effect size. Effect size variability was significantly explained by attention bias measure and effect type but not by stimulus type or stimulus pairing. Additionally, differences in the overall effect sizes of categories within each meta-regression variable were apparent, some of which were statistically significant.
590 $a School code: 1503.
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Gerontology. $3 533633
650 4 $a Personality psychology. $3 2144789
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
650 4 $a Aging. $3 543123
653 $a Meta-analysis
653 $a Meta-regression
653 $a Older adult
653 $a Positivity bias
653 $a Positivity effect
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0351
690 $a 0625
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0493
710 2 $a Fielding Graduate University. $b The School of Psychology. $3 1669722
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-02B.
790 $a 1503
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31486048