語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Bias in Diagnostic Decision Making: ...
~
Ackerman, Sayde Louise.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Bias in Diagnostic Decision Making: Borderline Personality Disorder and Gender Minorities.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Bias in Diagnostic Decision Making: Borderline Personality Disorder and Gender Minorities./
作者:
Ackerman, Sayde Louise.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:
95 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International85-04A.
標題:
Clinical psychology. -
電子資源:
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30687983
ISBN:
9798380594462
Bias in Diagnostic Decision Making: Borderline Personality Disorder and Gender Minorities.
Ackerman, Sayde Louise.
Bias in Diagnostic Decision Making: Borderline Personality Disorder and Gender Minorities.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 95 p.
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Adelphi University, 2023.
Prior research has generated mixed results when assessing diagnostic decision making for borderline personality disorder (BPD) as a function of client gender (e.g., Henry & Cohen, 1983; Morey & Ochoa, 1989; Sprock et al., 1990; Becker & Lamb 1994; Torgersen et al., 2001; Johnson et al., 2003; Eubanks-Carter & Goldfried, 2006; Woodward et al., 2009; Braamhorst et al., 2015). Additionally, prior studies have only examined differences in diagnostic decisions between cis-gender men and women. The current study aims to fill a gap in the literature by clarifying the role of gender identity, inclusive of non-binary individuals, in the diagnostic decisions that clinicians make, specifically for BPD. Furthermore, this study explores differences in diagnostic decisions as a function of clinicians' demographic and professional backgrounds. A sample of 85 clinicians and clinicians in training, sampled from professional and local listservs, were asked to complete a demographics questionnaire, and make diagnostic decisions for one of three randomly assigned hypothetical clients (a cis-gender male, a cis-gender female, and a nonbinary individual). Most participants provided a diagnosis of BPD to their hypothetical client (76.5%), regardless of the client's gender identity, with no significant differences between groups as a function of clients' or clinicians' gender. However, significant differences in diagnostic decisions were found as a function of clinicians' training background and status. Trainees were more likely to apply a diagnosis of BPD compared to non-trainees. Additionally, individuals who obtained or were in the process of obtaining doctoral level degrees were more likely to apply a diagnosis of BPD than participants who obtained or were in the process of obtaining a master's level degree. Clinical implications, directions for future research, and the limitations of the present study are discussed.
ISBN: 9798380594462Subjects--Topical Terms:
524863
Clinical psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Bias
Bias in Diagnostic Decision Making: Borderline Personality Disorder and Gender Minorities.
LDR
:03136nmm a2200409 4500
001
2402786
005
20241104055657.5
006
m o d
007
cr#unu||||||||
008
251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9798380594462
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI30687983
035
$a
AAI30687983
035
$a
2402786
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Ackerman, Sayde Louise.
$3
3773030
245
1 0
$a
Bias in Diagnostic Decision Making: Borderline Personality Disorder and Gender Minorities.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2023
300
$a
95 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: A.
500
$a
Advisor: Moore, Michael T.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Adelphi University, 2023.
520
$a
Prior research has generated mixed results when assessing diagnostic decision making for borderline personality disorder (BPD) as a function of client gender (e.g., Henry & Cohen, 1983; Morey & Ochoa, 1989; Sprock et al., 1990; Becker & Lamb 1994; Torgersen et al., 2001; Johnson et al., 2003; Eubanks-Carter & Goldfried, 2006; Woodward et al., 2009; Braamhorst et al., 2015). Additionally, prior studies have only examined differences in diagnostic decisions between cis-gender men and women. The current study aims to fill a gap in the literature by clarifying the role of gender identity, inclusive of non-binary individuals, in the diagnostic decisions that clinicians make, specifically for BPD. Furthermore, this study explores differences in diagnostic decisions as a function of clinicians' demographic and professional backgrounds. A sample of 85 clinicians and clinicians in training, sampled from professional and local listservs, were asked to complete a demographics questionnaire, and make diagnostic decisions for one of three randomly assigned hypothetical clients (a cis-gender male, a cis-gender female, and a nonbinary individual). Most participants provided a diagnosis of BPD to their hypothetical client (76.5%), regardless of the client's gender identity, with no significant differences between groups as a function of clients' or clinicians' gender. However, significant differences in diagnostic decisions were found as a function of clinicians' training background and status. Trainees were more likely to apply a diagnosis of BPD compared to non-trainees. Additionally, individuals who obtained or were in the process of obtaining doctoral level degrees were more likely to apply a diagnosis of BPD than participants who obtained or were in the process of obtaining a master's level degree. Clinical implications, directions for future research, and the limitations of the present study are discussed.
590
$a
School code: 0001.
650
4
$a
Clinical psychology.
$3
524863
650
4
$a
Personality psychology.
$3
2144789
650
4
$a
Gender studies.
$3
2122708
650
4
$a
Quantitative psychology.
$3
2144748
653
$a
Bias
653
$a
Borderline personality disorder
653
$a
Diagnosis
653
$a
Gender identity
653
$a
Non-binary individuals
690
$a
0622
690
$a
0632
690
$a
0625
690
$a
0733
710
2
$a
Adelphi University.
$b
Psychological Studies.
$3
3436642
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
85-04A.
790
$a
0001
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2023
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30687983
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9511106
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入