東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Sources of American Conduct: U.S...

Feher, Zoltan.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Sources of American Conduct: U.S. Strategy, China's Rise, and International Order = = 美国行为的根源：美国战略、中国崛起与国际秩序.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Sources of American Conduct: U.S. Strategy, China's Rise, and International Order =/
其他題名:	美国行为的根源：美国战略、中国崛起与国际秩序.
作者:	Feher, Zoltan.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
面頁冊數:	402 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-12A.
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31146850
ISBN:	9798382796499

The Sources of American Conduct: U.S. Strategy, China's Rise, and International Order = = 美国行为的根源：美国战略、中国崛起与国际秩序.
Feher, Zoltan.

The Sources of American Conduct: U.S. Strategy, China's Rise, and International Order =美国行为的根源：美国战略、中国崛起与国际秩序. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 402 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy (Tufts University), 2024.

Why did the United States help China rise into a peer competitor? The United States originally designed its strategy of engagement vis-a-vis China to balance against the Soviet Union during the late Cold War. My dissertation seeks to resolve the puzzle of why Washington continued pursuing its engagement strategy in the early post-Cold War period (1989-2009) and thereby contributed to the rise of China. Following the end of the Cold War, U.S. policymakers believed that the perpetuation of U.S. engagement strategy would lead China to pursue liberalization internally and to become a "responsible stakeholder" internationally. As China began its nearly unprecedented rise in the international system, the changes in the global distribution of capabilities should have prompted U.S. decisionmakers to shift U.S. strategy toward balancing, in line with Mearsheimer's offensive realism. I argue that, instead, American liberal strategic culture and the liberal ordering mission influenced policymakers to continue U.S. engagement strategy, including U.S. support for China's global market access, which eventually produced a China with tremendously increased capabilities that has questioned the legitimacy of the U.S.-led liberal international order and positioned itself as a great-power challenger to Washington. In this dissertation, I test the predictive power of my theory of the liberal ordering strategy and that of Mearsheimer's offensive realism against the actual historical record. My theory of the liberal ordering strategy, a neoclassical realist theory combining the effects of the changes in the global balance of power and of liberal strategic culture, has profound implications for a question hitherto understudied in the literature: why and how established great powers facilitate the emergence of rising states that may over time become peer competitors. This interdisciplinary research sits at the intersection of international security, international relations theory, diplomatic history, strategic studies, global political economy, and current policy challenges.

ISBN: 9798382796499Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

China's rise

The Sources of American Conduct: U.S. Strategy, China's Rise, and International Order = = 美国行为的根源：美国战略、中国崛起与国际秩序.
LDR:05065nmm a2200433 4500 001 2402622
005 20241029122344.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798382796499
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31146850
035 $a AAI31146850
035 $a 2402622
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Feher, Zoltan. $0 (orcid)0000-0002-8560-8247 $3 3772866
245 1 0 $a The Sources of American Conduct: U.S. Strategy, China's Rise, and International Order = $b 美国行为的根源：美国战略、中国崛起与国际秩序.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 402 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Pfaltzgraff, Robert L., Jr.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy (Tufts University), 2024.
520 $a Why did the United States help China rise into a peer competitor? The United States originally designed its strategy of engagement vis-a-vis China to balance against the Soviet Union during the late Cold War. My dissertation seeks to resolve the puzzle of why Washington continued pursuing its engagement strategy in the early post-Cold War period (1989-2009) and thereby contributed to the rise of China. Following the end of the Cold War, U.S. policymakers believed that the perpetuation of U.S. engagement strategy would lead China to pursue liberalization internally and to become a "responsible stakeholder" internationally. As China began its nearly unprecedented rise in the international system, the changes in the global distribution of capabilities should have prompted U.S. decisionmakers to shift U.S. strategy toward balancing, in line with Mearsheimer's offensive realism. I argue that, instead, American liberal strategic culture and the liberal ordering mission influenced policymakers to continue U.S. engagement strategy, including U.S. support for China's global market access, which eventually produced a China with tremendously increased capabilities that has questioned the legitimacy of the U.S.-led liberal international order and positioned itself as a great-power challenger to Washington. In this dissertation, I test the predictive power of my theory of the liberal ordering strategy and that of Mearsheimer's offensive realism against the actual historical record. My theory of the liberal ordering strategy, a neoclassical realist theory combining the effects of the changes in the global balance of power and of liberal strategic culture, has profound implications for a question hitherto understudied in the literature: why and how established great powers facilitate the emergence of rising states that may over time become peer competitors. This interdisciplinary research sits at the intersection of international security, international relations theory, diplomatic history, strategic studies, global political economy, and current policy challenges.
520 $a 美国为何帮助中国崛起为同等竞争对手？美国最初设计对华接触战略是为了在冷战后期制衡苏联。我的论文旨在解决华盛顿为何在冷战后初期（1989-2009）继续推行接触战略并从而促进中国崛起的谜团。冷战结束后，美国决策者认为，美国接触战略的延续将导致中国在国内追求自由化，并在国际上成为"负责任的利益相关者"。随着中国在国际体系中开始几乎前所未有的崛起，全球能力分布的变化本应促使美国决策者将美国战略转向平衡，这与米尔斯海默的进攻现实主义是一致的。我认为，相反，美国的自由主义战略文化和自由主义秩序使命影响了政策制定者继续美国的接触战略，包括美国对中国全球市场准入的支持，这最终产生了一个能力大幅增强的中国，对美国的合法性提出了质疑。领导自由国际秩序，并将自己定位为华盛顿的大国挑战者。在这篇论文中，我测试了我的自由秩序策略理论和米尔斯海默的进攻性现实主义理论对实际历史记录的预测能力。我的自由秩序战略理论是一种新古典现实主义理论，结合了全球力量平衡变化和自由战略文化的影响，对文献中迄今尚未充分研究的问题具有深远的影响：既定的大国为何以及如何促进随着时间的推移，新兴国家的出现可能会成为同等的竞争对手。这项跨学科研究处于国际安全、国际关系理论、外交史、战略研究、全球政治经济和当前政策挑战的交叉点。.
590 $a School code: 0930.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a History. $3 516518
650 4 $a American history. $3 2122692
650 4 $a International law. $3 560784
653 $a China's rise
653 $a Economic relations
653 $a Foreign policy
653 $a International order
653 $a United States
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0578
690 $a 0337
690 $a 0616
710 2 $a Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy (Tufts University). $b Diplomacy, History, and Politics. $3 1672280
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-12A.
790 $a 0930
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31146850